• Welcome to the new Internet Infidels Discussion Board, formerly Talk Freethought.

The female of the species is more deadly than the male

bilby

Fair dinkum thinkum
Joined
Mar 6, 2007
Messages
34,074
Location
The Sunshine State: The one with Crocs, not Gators
Gender
He/Him
Basic Beliefs
Strong Atheist
...at least, when it comes to Hurricanes.

http://www.iflscience.com/environment/study-concludes-female-hurricanes-are-more-dangerous-male-hurricanes

Through statistical modelling, the University of Illinois researchers concluded that hurricanes with female names cause around three times more deaths than those with male names.

Rather than this finding being related to the severity of the storms, the team hypothesised that hurricanes with female names may be perceived as less dangerous than those with male names. According to the study, this means that people are less likely to take protective measures such as evacuation during storms with female names and are therefore more vulnerable.
PNAS paper here.
 
I guess so. It's just that I realized I was drawn into your van under false pretenses ("The female of the species is more deadly than the male"). :angryfist:

1176698613194.jpg

:cheeky:
 
Very interesting. BTW, they did more than look at name-death toll correlations in real hurricanes. They also conducted controlled lab experiments in which they created hypothetical scenarios about impending hurricanes, where only the hurricane name was changed. Subjects didn't know the names had any importance, but judged hurricanes with female names as less intense and said they would be less likely to seek shelter or evacuate. Also, the more masculine and feminine the names, the bigger the difference the names made.

One interesting thing is that male names tend to start and end with hard consonant sounds (Mark, Luke, Jim, John, Rick), while female names are more likely to begin and/or end with a soft vowel sound (Alice, Amber, Mary, Laura, Aria) . Obviously, there are exceptions, but on average this is the case. It isn't implausible that just the hard or soft sounds of these words could evoke emotive reactions that impact such judgments, independent of gender stereotypes.
 
Then therehere is no wonder people believe in woo. The universe is a prankster.

Take for instance:
Gwyneth Paltrow explains why water just doesn't like bad vibes
It turns out that water – just like the rest of us – gets upset really, really easily. But don't take our word for it. Over to you, Gwyneth
http://www.theguardian.com/lifeandstyle/lostinshowbiz/2014/jun/05/gwyneth-paltrow-water-bad-vibes

Emoto’s Water Experiment: The Power of Thoughts
http://www.highexistence.com/water-experiment/

Things being what they are, as they present themselves, it's no surprise people believe in odd ideas and have been duped not only by people but by things themselves. And it's no wonder.


Correlation isn't causation, but heck, universe, stop correlating already, doggammit!!
 
Then therehere is no wonder people believe in woo. The universe is a prankster.

Take for instance:
Gwyneth Paltrow explains why water just doesn't like bad vibes
It turns out that water – just like the rest of us – gets upset really, really easily. But don't take our word for it. Over to you, Gwyneth
http://www.theguardian.com/lifeandstyle/lostinshowbiz/2014/jun/05/gwyneth-paltrow-water-bad-vibes

Emoto’s Water Experiment: The Power of Thoughts
http://www.highexistence.com/water-experiment/

Things being what they are, as they present themselves, it's no surprise people believe in odd ideas and have been duped not only by people but by things themselves. And it's no wonder.


Correlation isn't causation, but heck, universe, stop correlating already, doggammit!!

What does this post refer to?
The OP links to controlled double blind experiments showing a direct causal effect of hurricane names upon people's perceptions of the strength of those storms, their associated fear, and willingness to take precautions for an arriving storm. These experiments provide reasonably solid evidence that the correlations of death tolls and storm names for real storms are not spurious and provide evidence for the influence on the psychological mechanisms by which the names would have their impact on deaths.
 
Then therehere is no wonder people believe in woo. The universe is a prankster.

Take for instance:
Gwyneth Paltrow explains why water just doesn't like bad vibes
It turns out that water – just like the rest of us – gets upset really, really easily. But don't take our word for it. Over to you, Gwyneth
http://www.theguardian.com/lifeandstyle/lostinshowbiz/2014/jun/05/gwyneth-paltrow-water-bad-vibes

Emoto’s Water Experiment: The Power of Thoughts
http://www.highexistence.com/water-experiment/

Things being what they are, as they present themselves, it's no surprise people believe in odd ideas and have been duped not only by people but by things themselves. And it's no wonder.


Correlation isn't causation, but heck, universe, stop correlating already, doggammit!!

What does this post refer to?
The OP links to controlled double blind experiments showing a direct causal effect of hurricane names upon people's perceptions of the strength of those storms, their associated fear, and willingness to take precautions for an arriving storm. These experiments provide reasonably solid evidence that the correlations of death tolls and storm names for real storms are not spurious and provide evidence for the influence on the psychological mechanisms by which the names would have their impact on deaths.

Answer: The power of interpretation. I guess you got the same thing out of the OP as I did but with other words. Read closely.
 
Very interesting. BTW, they did more than look at name-death toll correlations in real hurricanes. They also conducted controlled lab experiments in which they created hypothetical scenarios about impending hurricanes, where only the hurricane name was changed. Subjects didn't know the names had any importance, but judged hurricanes with female names as less intense and said they would be less likely to seek shelter or evacuate. Also, the more masculine and feminine the names, the bigger the difference the names made.

One interesting thing is that male names tend to start and end with hard consonant sounds (Mark, Luke, Jim, John, Rick), while female names are more likely to begin and/or end with a soft vowel sound (Alice, Amber, Mary, Laura, Aria) . Obviously, there are exceptions, but on average this is the case. It isn't implausible that just the hard or soft sounds of these words could evoke emotive reactions that impact such judgments, independent of gender stereotypes.

"Alice" doesn't end in a vowel sound any more than "Luke" does, "Alice" ends in a . Don't let spelling dupe you.
 
Back
Top Bottom