It's funny to me, an irreligious individual of the rarest form of true free thought,
What if there were no theory of evolution?
Well, if does explain the prevalence of God (as a gardener) belief. Obviously selecting a believer, over a non-believer, to pass on their genes is favored. Look at the world.A lot more people would die from conditions and illnesses we today know how to treat thanks to our understanding of evolution.What if there were no theory of evolution?
It's funny to me, an irreligious individual of the rarest form of true free thought, that I see so many parallels with science and religion. Speculative excursion. What if there were no theory of evolution?
It's funny to me, an irreligious individual of the rarest form of true free thought, that I see so many parallels with science and religion. Speculative excursion. What if there were no theory of evolution?
Interesting, that is. For a major difference between religion and science, Religion once burned people at the stake for questioning their “truths”. Now they only condemn them to Hell. Meanwhile science hails those who question current scientific theories and can show that they are in error. Even greater rewards are afforded those who show errors in the current model and develop models that better explain and predict observations than the current models.It's funny to me, an irreligious individual of the rarest form of true free thought, that I see so many parallels with science and religion. Speculative excursion.
Good question. If there weren’t then people would certainly be working to come up with a model that could explain what we do see and now call evolution. If you were to be the one to come up with a theory that actually explained observations and was as able to predict like the current TOE does then you would be in line for a Nobel Prize.What if there were no theory of evolution?
If you were to be the one to come up with a theory that actually explained observations and was as able to predict like the current TOE does then you would be in line for a Nobel Prize.
If you were to be the one to come up with a theory that actually explained observations and was as able to predict like the current TOE does then you would be in line for a Nobel Prize.
Many intelligent beings working together trying out many different forms and making a few serendipitous mistakes to find out the forms that work best together would look exactly the same. However, in this case, forms that worked better with other forms would be selected for purposefully, rather than the selection occurring according to blind natural law.
Best forms would then perhaps behave regularly, and you'd get certain dumb forms that assumed this means everything came from these regular behaviors, until an asshole like me pointed out that they were idiots and they evolved.
Unintelligible gibberish .... This post has many words that have distinct meanings by themselves, but when strung together in this particular sequence, they fail to communicate any ideas.Many intelligent beings working together trying out many different forms and making a few serendipitous mistakes to find out the forms that work best together would look exactly the same. However, in this case, forms that worked better with other forms would be selected for purposefully, rather than the selection occurring according to blind natural law.If you were to be the one to come up with a theory that actually explained observations and was as able to predict like the current TOE does then you would be in line for a Nobel Prize.
It is certainly an alternative but, to be taken seriously, it would be necessary to show that critters like sponges, sea anemones, etc. were capable of working together to intentionally alter their forms. Even if it could be shown that such critters can alter their form, demonstrating intent would be a toughy.Unintelligible gibberish.... This post has many words that have distinct meanings by themselves, but when strung together in this particular sequence, they fail to communicate any ideas.Many intelligent beings working together trying out many different forms and making a few serendipitous mistakes to find out the forms that work best together would look exactly the same. However, in this case, forms that worked better with other forms would be selected for purposefully, rather than the selection occurring according to blind natural law.If you were to be the one to come up with a theory that actually explained observations and was as able to predict like the current TOE does then you would be in line for a Nobel Prize.
It's an alternative explanation for natural selection, which would provide an alternate to the current natural selection only paradigm of the ToE.
I thought everyone here was familiar enough with evolution that they would pick up on that immediately...
The intelligences could be at the quantum scale (or many scales of reality), and they might stick to their plan to create something out of specific behaviors.It is certainly an alternative but, to be taken seriously, it would be necessary to show that critters like sponges, sea anemones, etc. were capable of working together to intentionally alter their forms.It's an alternative explanation for natural selection, which would provide an alternate to the current natural selection only paradigm of the ToE.This post has many words that have distinct meanings by themselves, but when strung together in this particular sequence, they fail to communicate any ideas.Many intelligent beings working together trying out many different forms and making a few serendipitous mistakes to find out the forms that work best together would look exactly the same. However, in this case, forms that worked better with other forms would be selected for purposefully, rather than the selection occurring according to blind natural law.If you were to be the one to come up with a theory that actually explained observations and was as able to predict like the current TOE does then you would be in line for a Nobel Prize.
Gotcha, super-quantum-intelligent-but-sneaky polyphysiomorphism. You should write a paper on that. There may be a Nobel waiting for you.The intelligences could be at the quantum scale (or many scales of reality), and they might stick to their plan to create something out of specific behaviors.
If they wanted to train beings to work within a certain rule set, they couldn't go around changing their behaviors willy nilly. Every time they were observed, they'd have to act pretty much regularly so as not to create wild ideas (enough wild ideas are created by the regular behaviors).
If we started observing sponges change into seagulls, etc... shit would hit the fan and people would expect roses.
Gotcha, super-quantum-intelligent-but-sneaky polyphysiomorphism. You should write a paper on that. There may be a Nobel waiting for you.
The intelligences could be at the quantum scale (or many scales of reality),
Maybe intelligence appears magic to you, but trust me, it's just intelligence. All quantum level entities were born of fire, at the BB.The intelligences could be at the quantum scale (or many scales of reality),
Quantum! Quantum! QUANTUM! QUANTUM IS MAGIC!
No need to buy when you're full of it.Quantum, it's the *NEW and IMPROVED* god of the gaps. Get yours, ON SALE NOW!