lpetrich
Contributor
Idolatry = worship of pictures and statues. This sort of labeling is what nobody likes when it's directed against their beliefs and practices.Perhaps we shouldn't do that, then. The text itself has some very firm words against idolatry.lpetrich said:But if such a text is presented as being absolute, final truth for all of humanity over all of time, then it's another story.
I don't see why that would be a bad thing to do.Are "easy" and "good" synonyms?It would be easier to implant such a supposed revelation in everybody's brains and be done with it.
That entity's self-appointed interpreters often seem like they are doing that. Like implicitly saying "Gotcha! That part of the Bible is allegorical -- it doesn't mean what it says."Has God said "gotcha" to you lately?What a stupid argument. I try not to write impossibly cryptic messages and then complain about people not deciphering them. Let alone treat such messages as a gotcha, by making them easy to misunderstand and then saying "Gotcha!" when anyone misunderstands them.
Tri-omni is what the Xian God is often advertised as being.I don't think those terms are even logically coherent. How could you apply them to anything?Politesse, I am not sure what you are claiming. Are you claiming that the Xian God is not omnipotent? Not omniscient? Not omnibenevolent? Any combination of these departures from being tri-omni?
That's a reason that I like Greta Christina's Blog: All-Knowing, All-Powerful, All-Good: Pick Two, or, How Christian Theology Shoots Itself In the Foot In her woo-believing days, GC believed in a World-Soul "God" that was neither omnipotent nor omniscient nor omnibenevolent.
That can be said about just about *anything*.No, they use abstractions and symbols to stand in for concepts their minds cannot actually comprehend. ...Mathematicians understand infinities just fine, even though their minds are as finite as everybody else's minds.