• Welcome to the Internet Infidels Discussion Board.

The Race For 2024

Let me explain a few things to you, since you are obviously ignorant regarding how/when men are tested for prostate cancer. They are rarely checked after the age of 70 because prostate cancer after that age rarely becomes serious. Biden had his last last test for prostate cancer in 2014
You are BSing. Demented piece of shit has last stage and this is rare to get last stage all of a sudden, especially for POTUS.
The whole idea of testing is to detect before last stage.
No, you are simply ignorant regarding when men are no longer tested for prostate cancer, so I guess I will have to provide a link to help you understand. I am an RN who reads a lot about these things. This was something I didn't know much about but I've read quite a few articles over the past few days to help get a better understanding of this issue.

https://www.health.harvard.edu/mens-health/when-is-it-time-to-stop-being-checked-for-prostate-cancer

In the tug of war between fear of cancer and faith in science, it's especially important to understand the pros and cons of PSA testing. "Just in case" PSA screening often leads to men being diagnosed with slow-growing tumors that might never have caused them any problems or shortened their lives. Understandably, most men seek treatment anyway, but this may expose them to treatment complications, such as erectile dysfunction and urinary difficulties. In men at average risk, the harms of PSA testing often outweigh the benefits.

American Urological Association (AUA) age guidelines: The AUA does not recommend routine PSA screening for men 70 or older or with a life expectancy of less than 10 to 15 years. Screening may be considered in men ages 55 to 69 with the knowledge that it will prevent about one cancer death for every 1,000 men screened.
General rules are … general.
My brother (an MD) had long since stopped taking PSA tests until last year when, at 76, he took a PSA test for reasons not related to diagnosis. Lo and behold it came back positive and he is currently undergoing chemo. Because if his diagnosis I took a PSA test as well, my primary doc agreeing that it would be a good idea. My levels were way low, but I am certainly glad that my brother ended up in treatment sooner than later.
 
And, to answer the question regarding who has more signs of dementia....

https://www.usatoday.com/story/opin...nterview-abc-time-mental-decline/83391080007/

Is Trump in mental decline? He sounds far worse than Biden ever did. | Opinion​

Trump seems to know little, and he has grown increasingly incoherent and rambling, often wholly detached from reality.​

Trump's memory is not good. Just read these interview transcripts.​

And then this, from the same interview:

Trump: "If this were Biden, well, first of all, he wouldn't do an interview because he was grossly incompetent.”

Time: “We spoke to him last year, Mr. President.”

Trump: “Huh?”

Time: “We spoke to him a year ago.”

Trump: “How did he do?”

Biden is just an older adult who often forgets names, while Trump is totally incoherent most of the time. It's obvious to me, having spent many years caring for older adults, many who suffered from various forms of dementia, that Trump's cognitive decline is far worse than Biden's. Too late now. We have a psychopathic president who is in cognitive decline. I have problems understanding why most people don't see it when it's painfully obvious.
 
Let me explain a few things to you, since you are obviously ignorant regarding how/when men are tested for prostate cancer. They are rarely checked after the age of 70 because prostate cancer after that age rarely becomes serious. Biden had his last last test for prostate cancer in 2014
You are BSing. Demented piece of shit has last stage and this is rare to get last stage all of a sudden, especially for POTUS.
The whole idea of testing is to detect before last stage.
No, you are simply ignorant regarding when men are no longer tested for prostate cancer, so I guess I will have to provide a link to help you understand. I am an RN who reads a lot about these things. This was something I didn't know much about but I've read quite a few articles over the past few days to help get a better understanding of this issue.

https://www.health.harvard.edu/mens-health/when-is-it-time-to-stop-being-checked-for-prostate-cancer

In the tug of war between fear of cancer and faith in science, it's especially important to understand the pros and cons of PSA testing. "Just in case" PSA screening often leads to men being diagnosed with slow-growing tumors that might never have caused them any problems or shortened their lives. Understandably, most men seek treatment anyway, but this may expose them to treatment complications, such as erectile dysfunction and urinary difficulties. In men at average risk, the harms of PSA testing often outweigh the benefits.

American Urological Association (AUA) age guidelines: The AUA does not recommend routine PSA screening for men 70 or older or with a life expectancy of less than 10 to 15 years. Screening may be considered in men ages 55 to 69 with the knowledge that it will prevent about one cancer death for every 1,000 men screened.
General rules are … general.
My brother (an MD) had long since stopped taking PSA tests until last year when, at 76, he took a PSA test for reasons not related to diagnosis. Lo and behold it came back positive and he is currently undergoing chemo. Because if his diagnosis I took a PSA test as well, my primary doc agreeing that it would be a good idea. My levels were way low, but I am certainly glad that my brother ended up in treatment sooner than later.
That's true, but the point is that most men with prostate cancer after the age of 70 have cases that don't metastasize. I hope your brother will recover. Plus, these tests are often inaccurate according to what I've read. Good that you had a test too since these things often run in families.

I think Mr. Sohy had his last test at age 70, but it was because of some urinary symptoms he was experiencing. The urologist couldn't find a cause. The only point I've been trying to make is that Biden has not been tested since 2014, probably at the advice of his doctor. I was simply telling Barb this, since he made a comment that Biden has been covering up his cancer diagnosis. That was an lie. Biden only recently was diagnosed and his form of cancer is very rare for a man his age. It's sad that he didn't get checked at a later age, but one never knows.

Women are often advised to stop mammogram screening after age 75, but I have no plans to stop. It's an easy screening covered by M'care, assuming the Repugs don't stop that.
 
Biden is just an older adult who often forgets names,
Are you OK?
Race is over and facts about Biden's dementia and cover-up are slowly leaking out
I just posted an opinion piece that came out this month comparing both Biden and Trump's cognitive decline. It's very obvious that despite Biden showing some signs that most older adults have when it comes to cognitive decline, Trump's symptoms are far worse. Ddi you ever bother to read the link I posted? I could find a lot more, but if you really cared and were open minded, you could do your own research.

Btw, the so called facts are simply about Biden's old age. So far, no physician has diagnosed him with dementia, but since he is no longer president and he did step aside after his terrible debate, it doesn't matter. I'm just pointing out that we now have a president who's cognitive decline is much worse than the former president. Even if Biden, like Reagan did have some signs of dementia, Biden would have at least listened to qualified advisors instead of trying to be a dictator, making shit up and working towards destroying everything that was good about the US. That's all I have to say to you as I have no more time to waste.
 
At the risk of saying something massively controversial, Joe Biden was too old to run for president in 2024. This opinion was held by millions of Americans en masse during the lengthy preamble to the campaign—understandable, given how the incumbent appeared pallid, doddering, and unsettlingly fragile in his duties as head of state. But, nonetheless, elected Democrats and Democrat-aligned media alike held on to the idea that this octogenarian had some gas left in the tank, so long as he could stand upright. The charade ended during the first presidential debate—where a visibly mummified Biden claimed, among other things, to have “defeated Medicare” Since then, the president’s decline, and the (frankly, ongoing) cover-up by abetting aides and family members, has been one of the hottest stories in America. The minute-to-minute particularities of his enfeeblement have been covered with salacious glee, reaching an apogee this week with the release of Jake Tapper and Alex Thompson’s book about the grim pantomiming going on behind the scenes during the final acts of Biden’s presidency. How have the Democrats suddenly become the party handcuffed by absolute fealty to a party leader? Especially when, if I remember correctly, Biden was unceremoniously booted from the ticket over the summer once his brain started leaking from his nose for all to see?

Slate

There was nothing controversial about saying Brandon was too old to run again.
 
I just posted an opinion piece that came out this month comparing both Biden and Trump's cognitive decline. It's very obvious that despite Biden showing some signs that most older adults have when it comes to cognitive decline, Trump's symptoms are far worse.
This is utter BS. Trump is just dumb idiot. Whereas Biden showed clear sign of dementia.
just fucking look at Biden 20 years ago, or even 10, he was sharp, evil asshole but sharp.
 
At the risk of saying something massively controversial, Joe Biden was too old to run for president in 2024. This opinion was held by millions of Americans en masse during the lengthy preamble to the campaign—understandable, given how the incumbent appeared pallid, doddering, and unsettlingly fragile in his duties as head of state. But, nonetheless, elected Democrats and Democrat-aligned media alike held on to the idea that this octogenarian had some gas left in the tank, so long as he could stand upright. The charade ended during the first presidential debate—where a visibly mummified Biden claimed, among other things, to have “defeated Medicare” Since then, the president’s decline, and the (frankly, ongoing) cover-up by abetting aides and family members, has been one of the hottest stories in America. The minute-to-minute particularities of his enfeeblement have been covered with salacious glee, reaching an apogee this week with the release of Jake Tapper and Alex Thompson’s book about the grim pantomiming going on behind the scenes during the final acts of Biden’s presidency. How have the Democrats suddenly become the party handcuffed by absolute fealty to a party leader? Especially when, if I remember correctly, Biden was unceremoniously booted from the ticket over the summer once his brain started leaking from his nose for all to see?

Slate

There was nothing controversial about saying Brandon was too old to run again.
Brandon who? Why are we even talking about him anymore? Why do you care now?
 
I just posted an opinion piece that came out this month comparing both Biden and Trump's cognitive decline. It's very obvious that despite Biden showing some signs that most older adults have when it comes to cognitive decline, Trump's symptoms are far worse.
This is utter BS. Trump is just dumb idiot. Whereas Biden showed clear sign of dementia.
just fucking look at Biden 20 years ago, or even 10, he was sharp, evil asshole but sharp.
A slower gait and speech is not dementia.

Biden has given numerous interviews since the election and while speaking slower he has been lucid. Just recency he appeared on The View with no sign of dementia. You may have disagreed with what he said but which one of you two HAS dementia is still up for debate.

Frankly considering the the almost complete lack of reality coming from you lately my money's on you for the rubber room.
 
At the risk of saying something massively controversial, Joe Biden was too old to run for president in 2024. This opinion was held by millions of Americans en masse during the lengthy preamble to the campaign—understandable, given how the incumbent appeared pallid, doddering, and unsettlingly fragile in his duties as head of state. But, nonetheless, elected Democrats and Democrat-aligned media alike held on to the idea that this octogenarian had some gas left in the tank, so long as he could stand upright. The charade ended during the first presidential debate—where a visibly mummified Biden claimed, among other things, to have “defeated Medicare” Since then, the president’s decline, and the (frankly, ongoing) cover-up by abetting aides and family members, has been one of the hottest stories in America. The minute-to-minute particularities of his enfeeblement have been covered with salacious glee, reaching an apogee this week with the release of Jake Tapper and Alex Thompson’s book about the grim pantomiming going on behind the scenes during the final acts of Biden’s presidency. How have the Democrats suddenly become the party handcuffed by absolute fealty to a party leader? Especially when, if I remember correctly, Biden was unceremoniously booted from the ticket over the summer once his brain started leaking from his nose for all to see?

Slate

There was nothing controversial about saying Brandon was too old to run again.
Brandon who? Why are we even talking about him anymore? Why do you care now?
Because The Daily Mail has made him too invested in the Dementia angle.
 
A slower gait and speech is not dementia.
Actually it is on the list of symptoms. But that's not what I am talking about.
Dementia is a general term for the loss of cognitive function, including memory, language, and problem-solving, that is severe enough to interfere with daily life. Common symptoms include memory loss, difficulty with communication, confusion, disorientation, and changes in behavior and personality. These symptoms can vary depending on the type of dementia and its stage.

Early Symptoms:
  • Memory loss: Difficulty recalling recent events, names, or faces.

  • Problems with communication: Difficulty finding words, following conversations, or understanding what others are saying.

    • Confusion and disorientation: Being confused about time, place, or events.
    • Trouble with reasoning and problem-solving: Difficulty making decisions, planning, or organizing.
    • Changes in behavior and personality: Increased irritability, apathy, withdrawal, or aggression.
    • Vision problems: Difficulty with depth perception, judging distances, or recognizing objects.
I see nothing about gait and speech there. Another Barbos fail.
 
A slower gait and speech is not dementia.
Actually it is on the list of symptoms. But that's not what I am talking about.
Dementia is a general term for the loss of cognitive function, including memory, language, and problem-solving, that is severe enough to interfere with daily life. Common symptoms include memory loss, difficulty with communication, confusion, disorientation, and changes in behavior and personality. These symptoms can vary depending on the type of dementia and its stage.

Early Symptoms:
  • Memory loss: Difficulty recalling recent events, names, or faces.

  • Problems with communication: Difficulty finding words, following conversations, or understanding what others are saying.

    • Confusion and disorientation: Being confused about time, place, or events.
    • Trouble with reasoning and problem-solving: Difficulty making decisions, planning, or organizing.
    • Changes in behavior and personality: Increased irritability, apathy, withdrawal, or aggression.
    • Vision problems: Difficulty with depth perception, judging distances, or recognizing objects.
I see nothing about gait and speech there. Another Barbos fail.
Slower gait speed, or a reduction in walking speed, is often associated with cognitive decline and dementia. This is because gait, a complex motor function, is influenced by various factors, including brain areas involved in cognitive tasks. Slowed gait can precede the development of dementia by years and may be an early indicator of cognitive impairment.
While a slower gait and speech can be signs of certain conditions, including potential issues like cognitive decline or neurological conditions, they are not definitively indicative of dementia. Dementia is a broader term encompassing a decline in cognitive function, and other factors can cause slower gait and speech, such as aging, physical health issues, or medication
Another ZiprHead fail.
And yes, piece of shit has all of the symptoms you listed.
And it was not even me who brought up "slower gait and speech". I merely commented on this ridiculous claim.
 
A slower gait and speech is not dementia.
Actually it is on the list of symptoms. But that's not what I am talking about.
Dementia is a general term for the loss of cognitive function, including memory, language, and problem-solving, that is severe enough to interfere with daily life. Common symptoms include memory loss, difficulty with communication, confusion, disorientation, and changes in behavior and personality. These symptoms can vary depending on the type of dementia and its stage.

Early Symptoms:
  • Memory loss: Difficulty recalling recent events, names, or faces.

  • Problems with communication: Difficulty finding words, following conversations, or understanding what others are saying.

    • Confusion and disorientation: Being confused about time, place, or events.
    • Trouble with reasoning and problem-solving: Difficulty making decisions, planning, or organizing.
    • Changes in behavior and personality: Increased irritability, apathy, withdrawal, or aggression.
    • Vision problems: Difficulty with depth perception, judging distances, or recognizing objects.
I see nothing about gait and speech there. Another Barbos fail.
Slower gait speed, or a reduction in walking speed, is often associated with cognitive decline and dementia. This is because gait, a complex motor function, is influenced by various factors, including brain areas involved in cognitive tasks. Slowed gait can precede the development of dementia by years and may be an early indicator of cognitive impairment.
While a slower gait and speech can be signs of certain conditions, including potential issues like cognitive decline or neurological conditions, they are not definitively indicative of dementia. Dementia is a broader term encompassing a decline in cognitive function, and other factors can cause slower gait and speech, such as aging, physical health issues, or medication
Another ZiprHead fail.
And yes, piece of shit has all of the symptoms you listed.
And it was not even me who brought up "slower gait and speech". I merely commented on this ridiculous claim.
hey are not definitively indicative of dementia.
What part of the above did you miss?
 
Last edited:
Back
Top Bottom