• Welcome to the Internet Infidels Discussion Board.

The Wing

lpetrich

Contributor
Joined
Jul 27, 2000
Messages
26,850
Location
Eugene, OR
Gender
Male
Basic Beliefs
Atheist
What is The Wing? The Wing | Work and Community Spaces Designed for Women
Who We Are
Founded in 2016, The Wing is a growing community of women across the country and globe, gathering together to work, connect, and thrive.

Our Mission
The Wing’s mission is the professional, civic, social, and economic advancement of women through community.

Changes to The Wing Team and Community in Response to Covid-19 - temporarily shutting down. They don't know when they'll be able to reopen.

The Wing Is a Women’s Utopia. Unless You Work There. - The New York Times
Stepping into a Wing location feels a little like being sealed inside a pop-feminist Biodome. It is pitched as a social experiment: what the world would look like if it were designed by and for women, or at least millennial women with meaningful employment and a cultivated Instagram aesthetic. The Wing looks beautiful and expensive, with curvy pink interiors that recall the womb. The thermostat hovers around 72 degrees, to satisfy women’s higher temperature needs. A color-coded library features books by female authors only. There are well-appointed pump rooms, as well as private phone booths named after Lisa Simpson, Anita Hill and Lady Macbeth. There is an in-house cafe, the Perch, serving wines sourced from female vintners, and an in-house babysitting annex, the Little Wing, where members’ children may be looked after. The vibe is a fusion of sisterly inclusion and exclusive luxury: Private memberships run up to $3,000 per year, and the wait-list is 9,000 names long.

...
The Wing was conceived amid great expectations for the Hillary Clinton presidency, but it was her defeat that sharpened the company’s sense of mission. As Trump ascended to the White House, and sexual harassers were unmasked at workplaces across the country, the concept of the women’s-only club was elevated from luxury to necessity. Members who joined for a refuge from public bathrooms were now also claiming refuge from the patriarchy. The absence of men and the presence of fine amenities became a salve for the traumas experienced by women as a class. Gelman began to speak about a Wing membership as analogous to political agitation. The news of the day might be dispiriting for women, Gelman told Entrepreneur magazine, “but to see women coming together and fighting back and organizing — whether through the Women’s March or in support of organizations like the Wing — that’s the silver lining to all of this.”

...
In interviews with 26 current and former Wing employees, people who have worked in Wing headquarters and in spaces across the United States in jobs that range from cooking and cleaning to management, most told a similar story of excitement about their new workplace curdling into anxiety and disgust. (Many — citing fear of losing their jobs, of being sued over breaking the nondisparagement clause in their employment contract or of retribution from the Wing’s powerful professional network — agreed to speak only on the condition of anonymity.)
Not very successful in being a utopia.
 
The Wing: why a coworking space for women is controversial - Vox
The books on the walls are color-coded. The plants are lush. The bathrooms are stocked with luxury beauty products. On a recent visit to the SoHo location of the women’s club and coworking space, sunlight bathed millennial-pink furniture as, one floor below, construction finished on a childcare center.

To its founders, members, investors, and critics, though, the Wing is so much more than a pretty office. It’s a “safe, affirming professional network,” as Audrey Gelman, one of its co-founders, puts it. It is also a “workspace with community-building at its core,” according to Nicole Gibbons, a Wing member.
Its phone booths are named after fictional heroes like Ramona Quimby, Hermione Granger, and Lisa Simpson.
But this sanctuary, of course, isn’t available to everyone. It’s application-only, and its $215 monthly price tag (or $250 to access all locations), though affordable in the realm of coworking spaces, puts it out of reach for many women.

Per critic Kaitlyn Borysiewicz, the Wing focuses on “the advancement of a certain type of woman.”

...
The Wing, Gelman and Kassan, both 31, have said, mimics the women’s club movements of the late 19th and early 20th centuries. When women couldn’t join men’s institutions like country clubs or elite colleges, and didn’t have the right to vote, they created groups of their own.
A big criticism of The Wing is that it is too difficult for many women to afford. There is a section on "Debates about The Wing are part of a bigger conversation about corporate feminism" - the "Lean In" sort of upper-middle-class and upper-class feminism.
 
The Wing: how an exclusive women's club sparked a thousand arguments | World news | The Guardian
On a recent weeknight in midtown Manhattan, a trickle of professional women wearing sheath dresses and smart blouses swept into a delicately lit penthouse. The space they entered was filled with women quietly working and chatting, seated on an array of curved pastel furniture, designed to fit the precise ergonomic specifications of the average woman. The women’s computers bore stickers reading “I’m With Her”, “Hermione 2020”, and “Cornell”. The colour-coded bookshelves behind them included works such as 50 Ways to Comfort a Woman in Labor, Suffragette: My Own Story, and Cunt: A Declaration of Independence.

It was a typical Wednesday night at The Wing, an exclusive club that describes itself as a “network of work and community spaces designed for women of all definitions”. For between $185 and $250 per month, US Wing members – or Winglets, as the company sometimes calls them – can use the space to work, eat, socialise, breastfeed, shower, network, exercise, nap, reapply their makeup, meditate or all of the above. In other words, The Wing is a one-stop shop for the performance of contemporary mainstream feminism, a meticulously curated space where women can blow-dry their hair or “stage a small coup”, depending on the day.

...
Because The Wing is in part a co-working space, many of its members hail from professions in which office space is a rare commodity – the creative class of writers, editors, freelancers, artists and influencers who make up the media. Handily, these are precisely the same kind of people who like to tweet, Instagram and write about the world as it looks from The Wing. This has ensured that even its minutest details, from the coffee to the furniture to the lunch offerings to the customised scented candles in the gift shop, have been deemed worthy of an article of their own. It also means that The Wing has been the subject of seemingly endless criticism – accused of being too rich, too white, too cis-gendered, too feminist, not feminist enough, too liberal and not liberal enough. One former employee described it as a “super-toxic” place, while a British member told me that upon walking into The Wing in New York, she felt that she had found her “holy grail.”

...
Progressives often talk about The Wing in the same way they talk about the Democratic party: it’s not great but maybe things will get better, maybe the politicians will figure it out, maybe the world The Wing’s founders imagined they would serve will one day emerge. One vocal supporter of The Wing is, somewhat surprisingly, Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez. Gelman hosted a fundraiser for Ocasio-Cortez at her home in Brooklyn last summer and, a few months later, the politician told Glamour: “The Wing isn’t just a functional space, it’s a real symbol of what’s happening in our country.” She called the company “one of the most potent forces that we’ve seen emerge in politics this year.”
How The Wing Became a Secret Weapon For Midterm Candidates | Glamour - "In two years, the members-only coworking space has leveraged its brand of glamorous feminism to become an influential political hub, one that candidates use to galvanize voters. Here's how—and why—they're doing it."
At all five locations—three in New York, one in D.C., and one in California—members can register to vote, get tips on calling elected officials to protest family separation, and interface with female candidates and politicians who drop by. The same way celebrities and professionals like Christiane Amanpour, Fran Drescher, Katie Couric, Tina Fey, and Aly Raisman drop by, so do powerful women in government including Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton, former Obama aide Valerie Jarrett, Sen.Tammy Duckworth, and Sen. Dianne Feinstein.
Among those who appeared was Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez.
“The Wing isn’t just a functional space, it's a real symbol of what’s happening in our country,” Ocasio-Cortez told Glamour before her event earlier this month. The company represents “one of the most potent forces that we've seen emerge in politics this year,” she said, adding that she’s appeared before its members twice.
 
Wing is a sexist, exclusionary, female supremacist workspace. A male-only workspace would not be allowed in cities like NYC, so why does this feminazi shit get a pass from DeBlasio et al?
 
A big criticism of The Wing is that it is too difficult for many women to afford.
That's like saying that the main criticism of the segregated Woolworth lunch counters was that their prices for corned beef hash were too high. :rolleyes:
 
 The Wing (workspace) - it's gotten onto Wikipedia

I was reminded of

 Herland (novel)
Herland is a utopian novel from 1915, written by feminist Charlotte Perkins Gilman. The book describes an isolated society composed entirely of women, who reproduce via parthenogenesis (asexual reproduction). The result is an ideal social order: free of war, conflict, and domination. It was first published in monthly installments as a serial in 1915 in The Forerunner, a magazine edited and written by Gilman between 1909 and 1916, with its sequel, With Her in Ourland beginning immediately thereafter in the January 1916 issue. The book is often considered to be the middle volume in her utopian trilogy; preceded by Moving the Mountain (1911), and followed by, With Her in Ourland (1916). It was not published in book form until 1979.

"In comparison to the women of their world, the men view the women of Herland to have masculine physical features: having short, functional hair and lacking curves. The women are physically strong and demonstrate this by building huge buildings in their country."

Lacking curves? That's a biological absurdity. It may be possible for select for that, but it would take a lot of generations. Genetic engineering would be faster, but it would be difficult, because genes-to-shapes is still a largely unsolved problem.

"Having had no men for 2,000 years, the women apparently have no experience or cultural memory of romantic love or sexual intercourse."

I don't know if CPG had ever heard of same-sex relationships or same-sex sexual activities.

Looking at the pictures of The Wing's members, I think that CPG would be rather startled. They have the same curves that CPG herself and her contemporaries had - hard to change the genetics behind that, and we are only 3 or 4 generations away from CPG's day.

Women nowadays seldom have short hair, and often have hair as long as in CPG's day.

Clothing would be even more startling. From Charlotte Perkins Stetson Gilman-Herland
The garments were simple in the extreme, and absolutely comfortable, physically, though of course we all felt like supes in the theater. There was a one-piece cotton undergarment, thin and soft, that reached over the knees and shoulders, something like the one-piece pajamas some fellows wear, and a kind of half-hose, that came up to just under the knee and stayed there –had elastic tops of their own, and covered the edges of the first.

Then there was a thicker variety of union suit, a lot of them in the closet, of varying weights and somewhat sturdier material –evidently they would do at a pinch with nothing further. Then there were tunics, knee-length, and some long robes. Needless to say, we took tunics.

...
I see that I have not remarked that these women had pockets in surprising number and variety.
So CPG was referring to a full slip with a knee-length to ankle-length plain dress over it.

But outer clothing CPG would find rather startling. Many present-day women wear pants and shirts, something rare in her day, and going farther than what she had imagined. Some women continue to wear skirts and dresses, but those clothing items have a full range of lengths, from miniskirts/dresses to ankle length, though around knee length is the most common.

Women's clothing is only recently catching up in functional pockets.
 
Wing is a sexist, exclusionary, female supremacist workspace. A male-only workspace would not be allowed in cities like NYC, so why does this feminazi shit get a pass from DeBlasio et al?

There are actually four men-only clubs in NYC. The Holland Society, The New York Racquet and Tennis Club, The Brook Club and The Anglers's Club of New York.
 
There are actually four men-only clubs in NYC. The Holland Society, The New York Racquet and Tennis Club, The Brook Club and The Anglers's Club of New York.
Social clubs maybe. But not works paces. There is a big difference between socializing and professional works paces.

Also, even men-only social clubs are hated and perpetually attacked by feminists. But then they turn around and praise female only work spaces as somehow "progressive". Hypocrisy, thy name is feminism!
 
There are actually four men-only clubs in NYC. The Holland Society, The New York Racquet and Tennis Club, The Brook Club and The Anglers's Club of New York.
Social clubs maybe. But not works paces. There is a big difference between socializing and professional works paces.

Also, even men-only social clubs are hated and perpetually attacked by feminists. But then they turn around and praise female only work spaces as somehow "progressive". Hypocrisy, thy name is feminism!

Non-specific work spaces are social clubs.
 
Among those who appeared was Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez.
Why doesn't that surprise me? She is a fake progressive, in reality she supports female supremacism.

I do not in any way support female supremacism.
Except insofar as a good dose of female supremacism would serve to balance out the heinous faux-macho cowardly pussy grabbing male control freak who astonishingly holds sway over the attitudes of a bunch of voters and currently elected officials. Punks like that Gaetz moron are in style due to the PINO.
But I don't ordinarily support supremacism of any ilk. I try to be egalitarian, but it's hard when I have met vagrant street people who are more intelligent, responsible, kind, generous and forthright than the fucking President.
 
Maybe women wouldn't desire female work spaces if they didn't have to put up with the inappropriate behavior of some male coworkers. Sexual harassment and inappropriate touching is all too commonly accepted in some predominantly male work environments.
 
What do you expect? When you're driven by ideology you get it wrong. It doesn't matter what the ideology is, just that you put it above sensible business operation.
 
What do you expect? When you're driven by ideology you get it wrong. It doesn't matter what the ideology is, just that you put it above sensible business operation.

Here we have a growing company that is doing a roaring trade providing an in-demand service. It isn't driven by ideology; it's driven by profit. Ideology provides the market. If that isn't sensible business operation then nothing is.
 
What do you expect? When you're driven by ideology you get it wrong. It doesn't matter what the ideology is, just that you put it above sensible business operation.

Here we have a growing company that is doing a roaring trade providing an in-demand service. It isn't driven by ideology; it's driven by profit. Ideology provides the market. If that isn't sensible business operation then nothing is.

Did you not read the article?
 
Wing is a sexist, exclusionary, female supremacist workspace. A male-only workspace would not be allowed in cities like NYC, so why does this feminazi shit get a pass from DeBlasio et al?
You are misinformed:
The Wing is a women-focused, co-working space collective and club with offices in New York City, Washington, D.C., San Francisco, Chicago, Los Angeles, Boston, and London[1] It was founded by Audrey Gelman and Lauren Kassan in 2016.[2][3] As of July 2019, the club has about 10,000 members.[4] As of January 2019, The Wing accepts members regardless of gender identity, after their initial goal of only accepting women.[5 ( [/QUOTE]The_Wing_(workspace).
 
Back
Top Bottom