lpetrich
Contributor
I sometimes think that Trump ought to be dragged to The Hague and put on trial for crimes against humanity.
Sort of like what happened to Serbian leader Slobodan Milošević when he was deposed. The US pressured his successors to deport him for trial for war crimes, and they complied. A US helicopter took him from Belgrade, Serbia's capital, to the airbase at Tuzla, now a civilian airport, and from there to The Hague.
Logistically, it ought to be a simple matter to deport Trump to The Hague. The first step is getting him to Andrews Joint Base. It's 11 mi / 18 km by helicopter. From there, he can go by military transport to a US airbase in Europe, like Ramstein in Germany or Lakenheath in the UK (actually a British airbase that the US shares). From Ramstein, it is about 220 mi / 370 km to The Hague, and from Lakenheath, 160 mi / 260 km. One could do it by military helicopter.
Why The Hague? The International Criminal Court is seated there. There is the problem that the US has not signed the treaty that established it: States parties to the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court
Sort of like what happened to Serbian leader Slobodan Milošević when he was deposed. The US pressured his successors to deport him for trial for war crimes, and they complied. A US helicopter took him from Belgrade, Serbia's capital, to the airbase at Tuzla, now a civilian airport, and from there to The Hague.
Logistically, it ought to be a simple matter to deport Trump to The Hague. The first step is getting him to Andrews Joint Base. It's 11 mi / 18 km by helicopter. From there, he can go by military transport to a US airbase in Europe, like Ramstein in Germany or Lakenheath in the UK (actually a British airbase that the US shares). From Ramstein, it is about 220 mi / 370 km to The Hague, and from Lakenheath, 160 mi / 260 km. One could do it by military helicopter.
Why The Hague? The International Criminal Court is seated there. There is the problem that the US has not signed the treaty that established it: States parties to the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court
So Joe Biden might revert to an Obama-like attitude toward it.During the Obama administration, US opposition to the ICC evolved to "positive engagement," although no effort was made to ratify the Rome Statute.[20] The current Trump administration is considerably more hostile to the Court, threatening to arrest and prosecute ICC judges and staff in US courts as well as imposing visa bans in response to any investigation against American nationals in connection to alleged crimes and atrocities perpetrated by the US in Afghanistan. The threat included sanctions against any of over 120 countries which have ratified the Court for cooperating in the process.[21][12]