Nothing Hubbard can do can make him 'woman enough', because he is not a woman.
Nothing Hubbard can do can make him 'woman enough', because he is not a woman.
How do you know that Hubbard is not a woman?
What criteria are you using? How did you confirm your definition against Hubbard's characteristics?
Arbitrary? Bonkers.Seeing as people are going down the rabbit hole of insisting having an arbitrary definition on what wimin' folk are:
Nothing Hubbard can do can make him 'woman enough', because he is not a woman.
How do you know that Hubbard is not a woman?
What criteria are you using? How did you confirm your definition against Hubbard's characteristics?
So, when future anthropologists did up Hubbard’s bones, what are they going to find?
How do you know that Hubbard is not a woman?
What criteria are you using? How did you confirm your definition against Hubbard's characteristics?
How do you know that Hubbard is not a woman?
Because he is an adult human male. Adult human males cannot be women. They are men.
What criteria are you using? How did you confirm your definition against Hubbard's characteristics?
The criteria I am using is 'adult human female', as I've described earlier. Since there seems to be no dispute about Hubbard's adultness or humanness, it appears you are challenging the idea that he is not female.
Hubbard is not female, because his sex - male - was observed and recorded at birth. We know this because he competed as Gavin Hubbard in men's sports before he 'transitioned' to Laurel Hubbard.
Here's someone whose sex was observed and recorded as male on their birth certificate and then changed to female on a new birth certificate issued three weeks later.
They don't produce gametes so you can't use the size difference to determine whether on not they're female.
Now what?
Seeing as people are going down the rabbit hole of insisting having an arbitrary definition on what wimin' folk are:
[youtube]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LMeMtabtLiI[/youtube]
This fixation that some people have about finding news on trans people is kinda peculiar. Yup. Very peculiar I'd say.
In most countries, making the Olympic team is considered a sporting achievement.https://www.nzherald.co.nz/sport/la...of-the-year-award/MC7H4ZWWSL2L7BGUHMLDA4Y3ME/
(emphasis mine)
Transgender weightlifter Laurel Hubbard has been named University of Otago sportswoman of the year at the Blues awards earlier this week.
Hubbard is believed to be the first transgender winner of the award in the event's 113-year history.
The Queenstown athlete became the first openly transgender woman to compete at the Olympics when she contested the women's 87+kg at the Tokyo Games this year.
The 43-year-old was eliminated from the event when she failed to make a successful lift in the snatch.
Her achievement was recognised with the sportswoman of the year award at University of Otago and OUSA Blues and Golds Awards on Tuesday.
In a short statement to the Otago Daily Times Hubbard said she was ''grateful for all of the support and kindness received from the teaching staff and students at Otago University''.
''It is not possible for athletes to complete at the Olympic level without the encouragement and aroha of friends, family and supporters.
''This award belongs to everyone who has been part of my Olympic journey.''
Otago University Students' Association president Michaela Waite-Harvey said the Blues awards aim to highlight Otago students excelling in their chosen sport.
''We could think of no-one more worthy of sportswoman of the year than Laurel Hubbard who represented Otago and New Zealand incredibly well at this year's Tokyo Olympics.''
I'm not a weightlifting expert, but it's my opinion that failing all three snatch attempts and coming worst than last place (Did Not Finish) is not so much a sporting 'achievement', though it's certainly noteworthy.
Like many things in life over which one has little to no influence, in this case, your concerns are duly noted and are filed in the appropriate place.But I think the granting of the award has a bigger problem. The recipient is an adult human male, who is not a sportswoman because he is not any kind of woman at all.
In most countries, making the Olympic team is considered a sporting achievement.
Like many things in life over which one has little to no influence, in this case, your concerns are duly noted and are filed in the appropriate place.
According the New Zealand Olympic Committee and the International Olympic committee, no man made it into the Olympics to compete against women. And there is plenty of Olympic history to verify that the IOC has been watching for such occurrences. Perhaps you need to voice your feelings to New Zealand's Olympic committee and the International Olympic committee.In most countries, making the Olympic team is considered a sporting achievement.
It's true that no other man at the University of Otago made it in to the Olympics to compete and lose against women.
I admire the energy of people who persist flailing away at the inconsequential and fail.It's true that I won't influence the decision that that student association has already made, but I can make people aware of the decision. If indeed we are headed for an Orwellian future--where some men are women, where penis-in-vagina sex can be a lesbian act, where people are attracted to 'gender' and not sex--then I want to at least make sure it wasn't stumbled into blindly.
If indeed we are headed for an Orwellian future--where some men are women, where penis-in-vagina sex can be a lesbian act, where people are attracted to 'gender' and not sex--then I want to at least make sure it wasn't stumbled into blindly.
Actually, no man made it into the Olympics to compete against women. According the New Zealand Olympic Committee and the International Olympic committee, no man made it into the Olympics to compete against women. And there is plenty of Olympic history to verify that the IOC has been watching for such occurrences. Perhaps you need to voice your feelings to New Zealand's Olympic committee and the International Olympic committee.
I admire th energy of people who persist flailing away at the inconsequential and fail.
If indeed we are headed for an Orwellian future--where some men are women, where penis-in-vagina sex can be a lesbian act, where people are attracted to 'gender' and not sex--then I want to at least make sure it wasn't stumbled into blindly.
And this demonstrates my point. This fixation that some people have about finding news on trans people is kinda peculiar. Yup. Very peculiar I'd say. This incredible concern some people have about how others may have sex or view gender that some people perceived as not normal.
You are mistaken. The IOC does not allow men at all to compete against women. It allows women to compete against women. Apparently the IOC is unaware that you are the arbiter of reality.Actually, no man made it into the Olympics to compete against women. According the New Zealand Olympic Committee and the International Olympic committee, no man made it into the Olympics to compete against women. And there is plenty of Olympic history to verify that the IOC has been watching for such occurrences. Perhaps you need to voice your feelings to New Zealand's Olympic committee and the International Olympic committee.
Laurel Hubbard made it in to the Olympics to compete against women, and Laurel Hubbard is a man. That the International Olympic Committee decided that some men can qualify to compete against women by labelling those men 'trans women' does not change the reality of the IOC's decision to allow men to compete against women.
You are mistaken. I admire energy regardless of how it is expended. I may not admire the ends to which it is directed (humane and just or small-minded bigot) but the energy is admirable.I doubt you admire it, but I find callous your indifference to the open erosion of sex-based rights as 'inconsequential'.
If indeed we are headed for an Orwellian future--where some men are women, where penis-in-vagina sex can be a lesbian act, where people are attracted to 'gender' and not sex--then I want to at least make sure it wasn't stumbled into blindly.
And this demonstrates my point. This fixation that some people have about finding news on trans people is kinda peculiar. Yup. Very peculiar I'd say. This incredible concern some people have about how others may have sex or view gender that some people perceived as not normal.
You have repeated this three times. I read it the first time. I have processed and understood the fact that you consider some people to have peculiar behaviour.
You are mistaken. The IOC does not allow men at all to compete against women. It allows women to compete against women. Apparently the IOC is unaware that you are the arbiter of reality.
You are mistaken. I admire energy regardless of how it is expended. I may not admire the ends to which it is directed (humane and just or small-minded bigot) but the energy is admirable.
You have repeated this three times. I read it the first time. I have processed and understood the fact that you consider some people to have peculiar behaviour.
No. I think some people have peculiar concerns about how others have sex or view gender. It's like people actually think that how others have sex or view gender is a problem that for some reason needs a solution.