Derec
Contributor
Haven’t they killed this guy six times now?
When were the first five times supposed to have happened?
Haven’t they killed this guy six times now?
Ever the optimist, eh?cite?The killing of Baghdadi does not balance Trump's abandonment of our allies the Kurds to Turkey. Baghdadi's death had to occur sooner or later, but we didn't have to stab the Kurds in the nack
I find it weird how leftists say, "The Kurds! The Kurds! Our allies!" But when we speak of our ally in Israel who also needs our help, leftists say,
Haven’t they killed this guy six times now?
When were the first five times supposed to have happened?
The killing of Baghdadi does not balance Trump's abandonment of our allies the Kurds to Turkey. Baghdadi's death had to occur sooner or later, but we didn't have to stab the Kurds in the nack
I find it weird how leftists say, "The Kurds! The Kurds! Our allies!" But when we speak of our ally in Israel who also needs our help, leftists say, "Screw Israel! They don't need us to fight their battles! Why are we helping Israel?!?!"
Very anti-semitic. No other explanation.
Also, leftists speak better of an ISIS terrorist than they do about the President:
"Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi, austere religious scholar ad helm of Islamic State, dies at 48".
That was the Washington Post headline at first before they changed it. And people say leftists are the logical ones?
Orange man bad, ISIS leader good! LOL!
WUT! You really know how to twist the facts. If Sean Hannity your mentor?
I didn't even know he was a scholar until you posted that title. Thank you for informing me.
I didn't even know he was a scholar until you posted that title. Thank you for informing me.
You're disgusting.
What's wrong with the headline, "Terrorist coward Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi dies whining and crying at 48" instead?
ad helm? Is that Latin?WUT! You really know how to twist the facts. If Sean Hannity your mentor?
Twisting what facts? The headline of the Washington Post said this at first:
"Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi, austere religious scholar ad helm of Islamic State, dies at 48".
Can you see how that sounds like praise and sympathies toward the terrorist?
more Latin?Read it again:
"Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi, austere religious scholar ad helm of Islamic State, dies at 48".
Well, no. Since Baghdadi was willing to actually fight fir something he believes in. Several times, you have cast scorn upon "leftists" for wanting war but not willing to enlist, right?Can't you see how sick and deranged it is for people to speak better of a terrorist leader than our own American President?
For admitting I didn't know a fact??? You informed me. So I thanked you. Do you hate facts?
What's wrong with the headline, "Terrorist coward Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi dies whining and crying at 48" instead?
How do you know he was whining and crying? Is there a video?
For admitting I didn't know a fact??? You informed me. So I thanked you. Do you hate facts?
What's wrong with the headline, "Terrorist coward Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi dies whining and crying at 48" instead?
How do you know he was whining and crying? Is there a video?
ad helm? Is that Latin?more Latin?Read it again:
"Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi, austere religious scholar ad helm of Islamic State, dies at 48".
Odd how you think we can't just look up a bit to reread that....
Well, no. Since Baghdadi was willing to actually fight fir something he believes in. Several times, you have cast scorn upon "leftists" for wanting war but not willing to enlist, right?Can't you see how sick and deranged it is for people to speak better of a terrorist leader than our own American President?
So, by your expressed standards, that compliments Baghdadi more than you could EVER compliment that craven orange draft-dodging coward, who wants to take credit for an operation he jeopardized thru his own fawning over dictators.
For admitting I didn't know a fact??? You informed me. So I thanked you. Do you hate facts?
What's wrong with the headline, "Terrorist coward Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi dies whining and crying at 48" instead?
How do you know he was whining and crying? Is there a video?
Why are you sticking up for a terrorist? You guys treat the average Joe Christian worse than terrorists.
For admitting I didn't know a fact??? You informed me. So I thanked you. Do you hate facts?
What's wrong with the headline, "Terrorist coward Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi dies whining and crying at 48" instead?
How do you know he was whining and crying? Is there a video?
I thought he set off a suicide vest. That takes guts.
Unlike Bonespurs, who fires people by tweet to avoid confronting them.
i am not defending him, Halfie. Read my post again.ad helm? Is that Latin? more Latin?
Odd how you think we can't just look up a bit to reread that....
Well, no. Since Baghdadi was willing to actually fight fir something he believes in. Several times, you have cast scorn upon "leftists" for wanting war but not willing to enlist, right?
So, by your expressed standards, that compliments Baghdadi more than you could EVER compliment that craven orange draft-dodging coward, who wants to take credit for an operation he jeopardized thru his own fawning over dictators.
Keith, I am literally in shock that you guys are defending one of the worst terrorists in the world. This is mindboggling.
Again, i am not saying that _I_ laud the corpse. Just that you are inconsistent, and unwilling to face the consequences of your own claims.What happened to, "Screw him! Let him rot!"
For admitting I didn't know a fact??? You informed me. So I thanked you. Do you hate facts?
What's wrong with the headline, "Terrorist coward Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi dies whining and crying at 48" instead?
How do you know he was whining and crying? Is there a video?
Why are you sticking up for a terrorist? You guys treat the average Joe Christian worse than terrorists.
Why are you sticking up for a terrorist? You guys treat the average Joe Christian worse than terrorists.
I am not defending him. I don't even know him. For example, I didn't even know he was a scholar until you told me.
Has he wriiten any books? Or peer-reviewed papers?
I thought he set off a suicide vest. That takes guts.
Unlike Bonespurs, who fires people by tweet to avoid confronting them.
Why are you sticking up for a terrorist? You guys treat the average Joe Christian worse than terrorists.
I am not defending him. I don't even know him. For example, I didn't even know he was a scholar until you told me.
Has he wriiten any books? Or peer-reviewed papers?
THE WASHINGTON POST SAID HE WAS A SCHOLAR!!! NOT ME!!!
IT'S THEIR WAY OF LOW-KEY PRAISING THE TERRORIST FILTH!!!
I thought he set off a suicide vest. That takes guts.
Unlike Bonespurs, who fires people by tweet to avoid confronting them.
Dipwad, if a guy is brave, he's brave. Doesn't mean i approve of him.
I would rather know the truth than get propaganda like 'died whimpering and calling for baby Jesus.'
Besides, aren't WE glorified by facing competent opponents? If we only kill wimps, we're just bullies.
you do. Several times you have made it clear that you prefer actual fighters to just talkers.... must be rough, us being at war for the last 20 years and you never making it thru boott camp.Dipwad, if a guy is brave, he's brave. Doesn't mean i approve of him.
I would rather know the truth than get propaganda like 'died whimpering and calling for baby Jesus.'
Besides, aren't WE glorified by facing competent opponents? If we only kill wimps, we're just bullies.
You think someone who goes around killing innocent people is brave?
if he suicide by his own hand, that does take guts. Something you apoatently know bupkes about.someone who commits suicide because he couldn't face the incoming soldiers like a man is brave?
and again, halfie, ALL OF THIS IS FROM YOUR STANDARDS. I am just the guy who recalks what YOU have said.jesus, Keith! This is insanity even by leftist standards.