• Welcome to the Internet Infidels Discussion Board.

Was the temptation narrative of Jesus in anyway influenced by the temptation of Buddha story?

repoman

Contributor
Joined
Aug 3, 2001
Messages
8,617
Location
Seattle, WA
Basic Beliefs
Science Based Atheism
I am very poorly informed about this topic, but I thought I would ask the question here.
 
I don't know why it would need to be. The plot point of a hero being tempted by evil and choosing to reject it and be the good guy instead is one which two people could come up with independently.
 
You could look at other possible borrowings, whether transmission from Buddhist sources is plausible, and whether material could be better explained as being borrowed from previous Jewish sources etc, or just the kind of thing that is easily invented.

I know there are some people that claim borrowings from Buddhism, but I suspect it's a fringe view.
 
Imo it's fringe because the evidence for the input of Buddhism into Xianity is arguably thin (maybe very thin, I'm not exactly familiar).

People cite all sorts of parallels. It can amount to (mere) Parallelism. Certain 'plotlines' and ideas turn up again and again in human history, sometimes historical, sometimes not. Plus there's rampant cross-fertilization, and this can mean that actual events get repeated as versions of each other, or it can mean that what are 'just stories' get repeated as narratives. If we don't know the intent of the writer and what their sources or situations were, it's very hard to tell where it came from or was influenced by or whether it was historical or not.
 
Last edited:
Does anyone know work on criteria advanced for settling this kind of question? (Or what counts as good evidence when it comes to parallels between texts.)
 
Does anyone know work on criteria advanced for settling this kind of question? (Or what counts as good evidence when it comes to parallels between texts.)

Heck - we can't even settle the matter of whether Melania plagiarized Michelle's speech. Good luck with settling it thousands of years later...
 
Does anyone know work on criteria advanced for settling this kind of question? (Or what counts as good evidence when it comes to parallels between texts.)

Heck - we can't even settle the matter of whether Melania plagiarized Michelle's speech. Good luck with settling it thousands of years later...

Even if it's difficult to conclusively settle some things, there must be criteria for what is better or worse evidence. We find parallels to be very persuasive evidence in at least some cases.
 
Christopher Booker says that there are only seven basic plots underlying all stories, so it would seem likely that there are plenty of completely independent repeats, and unlikely that it will be possible to distinguish between copying and independent development of similar stories from antiquity.

Joseph Campbell and Erich Neumann (amongst others) consider both the Jesus and Budda narratives as examples of the monomyth; It's a story that gets told over and over again.

Absent some very clear and obvious reason to think that one story is a reworking of the other, it is perfectly plausible that they might be very similar, but unrelated.
 
http://www.jesusneverexisted.com/buddha.html

From that link:
More than two dozen story elements borrowed from the Buddha

1. Pre-existence. 2. Royal origin and genealogy. 3. Virginal Conception by mother/Virgin Birth. 4. Dream Vision. 5. White Elephant / White Dove parallel. 6. Annunciation to the Husband. 7. Annunciation of Birth by a Woman 8. Righteous foster father. 9. Marvellous Light/Star. 10. Angels and others at birth. 11. The Magi's´ visit 12. Giving of Gifts. 13. Presentation in the Temple. 14. Infant prodigy / precocious youth. 15. Nature Miracle. 16. The Naming Ceremony. 17. The Taming of Wild Animals. 18. The Miracles of the Bending Tree and Gushing Water. 19. The Fall of Idols. 20. Healing Miracles. 21. Sage recognition - Asita / Simeon parallel 22. Anna and Shabari/Old Women parallel. 23. The Appellation of King. 24. Mary / Mahâprajâpati parallel 25. Fast in wilderness / temptation by the devil. 26. Preparing the Way. 27. Reference to Signs 28. Offer of universal Salvation.

It's well worth reading that page if you're interested in this question.
 
How widespread is this in hero mythology more generally? Consider Lord Raglan's mythic-hero profile. Jesus Christ scores high, like other mythical people -- the likes of Zeus, Oedipus, Perseus, Hercules, Romulus, Krishna, and Moses.

It must also be noted that Jesus Christ was different in several important ways from the Buddha -- mythical heroes aren't all alike.

JC: someone tried to kill him in his infancy
B: nobody did, though his father tried to pamper him

JC: raised a commoner
B: raised a prince

JC: not much about his spiritual journey except for rejecting the Devil's temptations
B: we learn more, like how he almost starved himself at one point

JC: he has a hero's welcome in Jerusalem, but people then turned against him, and he got crucified
B: no such repudiation, and he died pretty much accidentally, from eating tainted pork or mushrooms

JC: he got angry at people who wouldn't listen to him
B: he was much calmer, and he said that someone's unwelcome ridicule was an unwanted gift, and that unwanted gifts belong to their givers
 
If you're fabricating a myth there's no need to consider plagiarism. You're starting with a supernatural blank canvas.
If two fabricated myths happen to share a similar event - so what?
But if you really wanna get yourself into a Dan Brown state of excitement thinking you've stumbled across something earth-shaking you may as well speculate that the Buddah temptation idea was itself borrowed from the story of Job - which predates Buddah a few thousand years.
 
repoman, haven't you done any research on the temptations of Jesus Christ and the Buddha? Like collecting the appropriate source texts.
 
Back
Top Bottom