bilby
Fair dinkum thinkum
- Joined
- Mar 6, 2007
- Messages
- 36,499
- Gender
- He/Him
- Basic Beliefs
- Strong Atheist
The average billionaire has far fewer children than the average poor person.That's easy to do - just make them less poor.Birth rates have dropped sharply in some of the world's richest states and are likely to stay low as economic worries leave people weighing the costs of having children, a report from the Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development said. The total fertility rate dropped to 1.5 children per woman in 2022 from 3.3 in 1960 on average across OECD countries, the report said
News
Just need to stop the poor from having kids and the problem sorts itself.
The average billionaire emits a million times more grernhouse gases than the average person.
But the problem is... those damned poor people.
We have ways to reduce both carbon emissions and birthrates. The two are not coupled; A billionaire who invests his wealth in nuclear power likely has a negative long-term carbon footprint. And we know that as populations get richer, their birthrates plummet.
Making poor people into not particularly poor people is massively carbon negative, even though they start doing stuff (like driving cars) that increase their individual carbon footprints, because there are automagically fewer not particularly poor people than there are poor people. Nobody (until you introduced this red herring) was talking about billionaires; To reduce birthrates, all that is needed (ceteris paribus) is sufficient income to provide for retirement.