• Welcome to the new Internet Infidels Discussion Board, formerly Talk Freethought.

What should Israel do?

Then you should have no objections to Israel smashing the houses of terrorists.

If we adopt your standards none of us would have objections to blowing up a bus full of Israelis, what with all the active duty military and reservists on board. But we do object. Do you know why?
 
Then you should have no objections to Israel smashing the houses of terrorists.

If we adopt your standards none of us would have objections to blowing up a bus full of Israelis, what with all the active duty military and reservists on board. But we do object. Do you know why?

Of course we object. And we would even want any living person who helped to go to jail.

But they go to jail WITH the planners and perpetrators of the massive oppression and slow theft from millions. They have committed far worse crimes. Crimes directed at civilians.

It is not justice if only one side goes to jail for it's crimes against civilians. There are crimes short of killing somebody, like destroying somebodies life with oppression.
 
Then you should have no objections to Israel smashing the houses of terrorists.

Doesn't follow.

Israel carries out decades of massive oppression.

It doesn't get to escalate that oppression because people resist the only way they can.

It does follow. You need a consistent set of rules for both sides to play by.
 
Doesn't follow.

Israel carries out decades of massive oppression.

It doesn't get to escalate that oppression because people resist the only way they can.

It does follow. You need a consistent set of rules for both sides to play by.

There hasn't been that, Loren and you know it. Where's your proposal for such a consistent set of rules that will lead to peace and not just more game playing?
 
Doesn't follow.

Israel carries out decades of massive oppression.

It doesn't get to escalate that oppression because people resist the only way they can.

It does follow. You need a consistent set of rules for both sides to play by.

Yes I know.

You want the weak to have to play by the same rules as the strong.

You want the strong to have every advantage in their oppression.

You are nothing but an apologist for tyrannical power.
 
It does follow. You need a consistent set of rules for both sides to play by.

There hasn't been that, Loren and you know it. Where's your proposal for such a consistent set of rules that will lead to peace and not just more game playing?

As I said, a consistent set of rules. Since your rules are not about peace you don't get to require peace of other sets of rules, either.
 
Back
Top Bottom