Colonel Sanders
Senior Member
I mean this seriously. I can throw out sarcastic jokes about Trump and his baffling legion of ignoramuses all day, but we're at the point where this needs to be seriously considered. There are several things that seriously concern me with respect to domestic affairs (yes, foreign affairs are equally if not even more terrifying, but this is going to be too long already).
Primarily it's about reprisals against First Amendment freedoms. If we lose that, the rest fall like dominoes. Trump has attempted to ban certain journalists and media sources from his campaign for being "unfair" to him. God, it's so hard not to get snarky right now ... count to ten ... okay. So what could Trump do as President to silence the media?
I don't think it would take the form of us waking up one morning to find that Fox News is the only station on TV anymore; nothing that sudden and dramatic. But intimidation into silence through FBI investigations into certain key individuals could begin the process. For example, what does Rachel Maddow do with her money? Where does she put it and how much does she have? If you know that, and if you can seize it, even temporarily, along with exaggerated charges, you can effectively silence anyone. And the President can, right now, do just that. The FBI is under the control of the DOJ, which is under the control of the executive branch. And the President has the right to fire and make appointments within the DOJ. I won't get into a whole thing about noble agents disobeying unlawful orders because someone who will obey can always be found.
Trump has also expressed discontent over the fact that protesters don't suffer consequences anymore. Whatever that might mean, it is safe to say that he wasn't making any reference to anything having to do with rewarding protesters for exercising their right to peaceably assemble and express themselves. With a press that's been intimidated into compliance--and they already are to a certain degree--through what medium will mass outrage and dissent be expressed if protests are violently crushed by Executive order? The answer sure as hell isn't the internet. If China can largely censor what its citizens can see on the internet, the U.S. government can do the same.
Yes, I'm aware of how paranoid I sound. But as I read other forums, and read what Trump supporters say, there is a significant portion of that crowd that would gleefully support exactly what I'm talking about. I have a family member, a cousin, who, when I hear him speak, sounds like a slimy informant type of person. And there are tens of thousands out there just like him. If not more.
Or maybe I'm just letting my imagination run away with me. But these people are fucking scary.
Primarily it's about reprisals against First Amendment freedoms. If we lose that, the rest fall like dominoes. Trump has attempted to ban certain journalists and media sources from his campaign for being "unfair" to him. God, it's so hard not to get snarky right now ... count to ten ... okay. So what could Trump do as President to silence the media?
I don't think it would take the form of us waking up one morning to find that Fox News is the only station on TV anymore; nothing that sudden and dramatic. But intimidation into silence through FBI investigations into certain key individuals could begin the process. For example, what does Rachel Maddow do with her money? Where does she put it and how much does she have? If you know that, and if you can seize it, even temporarily, along with exaggerated charges, you can effectively silence anyone. And the President can, right now, do just that. The FBI is under the control of the DOJ, which is under the control of the executive branch. And the President has the right to fire and make appointments within the DOJ. I won't get into a whole thing about noble agents disobeying unlawful orders because someone who will obey can always be found.
Trump has also expressed discontent over the fact that protesters don't suffer consequences anymore. Whatever that might mean, it is safe to say that he wasn't making any reference to anything having to do with rewarding protesters for exercising their right to peaceably assemble and express themselves. With a press that's been intimidated into compliance--and they already are to a certain degree--through what medium will mass outrage and dissent be expressed if protests are violently crushed by Executive order? The answer sure as hell isn't the internet. If China can largely censor what its citizens can see on the internet, the U.S. government can do the same.
Yes, I'm aware of how paranoid I sound. But as I read other forums, and read what Trump supporters say, there is a significant portion of that crowd that would gleefully support exactly what I'm talking about. I have a family member, a cousin, who, when I hear him speak, sounds like a slimy informant type of person. And there are tens of thousands out there just like him. If not more.
Or maybe I'm just letting my imagination run away with me. But these people are fucking scary.