Artemus
Veteran Member
A thread over in the Lounge got me thinking about products that pretentious people pay a premium for to show off their exquisite taste, sophistication, or extraordinary abilities that actually perform the intended function worse than the less expensive alternatives in both objective and subjective (if proper controls are used in testing) terms. Things that were mentioned in that thread were:
1. Mechanical watches.
2. Audiophile products (tube/valve amplifiers, vinyl lps versus cds).
3. Fountain pens.
4. Super cars, due to the ability to use in a parking lot, and I'll add the poorer reliability compared to a Toyota . (I was stuck behind a broken Ferrari a while back. Probably not a "super car," but more you spend, the less the reliability it seems.)
5. A type of beer that had too much hops, which I can't remember and am too lazy to go look up. (I personally find all beer undrinkable so I have trouble relating to this one.)
Anyone else have things that they cannot believe people spend $$$$ on when there is an alternative for $ that is clearly better for the designed purpose?
1. Mechanical watches.
2. Audiophile products (tube/valve amplifiers, vinyl lps versus cds).
3. Fountain pens.
4. Super cars, due to the ability to use in a parking lot, and I'll add the poorer reliability compared to a Toyota . (I was stuck behind a broken Ferrari a while back. Probably not a "super car," but more you spend, the less the reliability it seems.)
5. A type of beer that had too much hops, which I can't remember and am too lazy to go look up. (I personally find all beer undrinkable so I have trouble relating to this one.)
Anyone else have things that they cannot believe people spend $$$$ on when there is an alternative for $ that is clearly better for the designed purpose?