• Welcome to the Internet Infidels Discussion Board.

Who Agrees Fourth Wave Feminism is Toxic Femininity And Should Be Abolished?

Apparently your mind is lead by delusion.

What gender does that make you:




If you are equating knowledge with bigotry, it makes it much more difficult to make your case that men's minds are lead by logic.




Wow. This is really like saying that men think with their dicks. Of course, that also explains why some men don't seem capable of thinking at all.


Sort of like the old, "I'm voting for Hillary because she's a woman!" This wold be emotional thinking, not logical thinking.

It seems every bit as logical as voting for men because they are men. Which is why men get elected. Not because they are good at anything or know anything. How else does one explain Trump?

Mostly every election is man vs man. You can't say, "I voted for Romney because he's a man and I did not vote for Obama because he's a man."

How stupid, right?

I agree that it is stupid that the only candidates in most elections are men.
 
Wow, do you and Derec cheat off each other’s tests? That’s practically verbatim for what he obsesses over.

Why the heck EITHER of you are chasing after women who “like bad boys” is utterly beyond me.

Edited to add - this doesn’t even make sense. Why would she “wish she didn’t waste her 20s sleeping around,” if the 30yo guys are so boring? Wouldn’t she be glad she did while she could? This is nonsense.

She is mad because all the good guys who would treat her well are now already taken in their 30's. She regrets ignoring these guys in her 20's just so she can have sex with "bad boys." Now, she has to settle for boring men with no social skills.

This is basic common knowledge of the females who sleep around. But remember, not all females sleep around like this. Some of them do get married in their 20's.

Oh my goodness. This is simultaneously pathetic and nonsensical.
Stop being so emotional, dude.
 
My impression is that fourth wave feminism has limited reach. The Internet and social media, especially Twitter and YouTube, seem to amplify its impact on society. In reality most of us don't interact with it. After all, the majority of women do not describe themselves as feminists. Because most women aren't stupid.
 
Mostly every election is man vs man. You can't say, "I voted for Romney because he's a man and I did not vote for Obama because he's a man."

How stupid, right?

I agree that it is stupid that the only candidates in most elections are men.

Then just have women run. But, should women run just because they are women?
 
I'm sorry that I don't get the point of the sentence following your meme. Are you saying that women must die if they are tainted by a man releasing his 'lust?'

I think he's pointing out the insanity of the position. The guy was the one in complete control of the situation, but he is not to be punished for his actions. The animal that did nothing wrong gets the death penalty, though. I don't see how it's talking about women at all.

By extension. If there is no woman, then there is no true lost or sexual sin and the animal becomes tainted. A lot of people equate women with sheep or or cows or pigs. Not good people but:
some people.

It definitely does not equate them! It's talking about a difference.
 
Sources like Pew Research demonstrate womens' support for Trump is low, about 31%. Women voters outnumbered men 52% to 48% in 2018. The GOP is about to learn, you cannot stay in office screwing women over. Pink pussy hats will oust the Red MAGA hat crew, and it couldn't happen to a more deserving herd of pigs.

Then the message will be heard loud and clear across this great nation. You can't screw over this nation's women and hope to be president. A lot of infantile male idiot boys are going to be left with nothing but ranting and their threadbare MAGA hats.
 
Wut a load of shit.

I was always a good guy, never ever considered good looking. After I got over my adolescent shyness, I had little trouble getting women.

I never said it was every single man or every single woman.

Why do you guys always jump to absolutes?

Irony. Big fan.

And yet you missed this one:
It's like you guys are 13!!!

I don't trust anyone who feels the need to excessively use punctuation. Usually, they are lying hypocritical cunts that can only make arguments by using sweeping generalizations and are fucking allergic to citing sources to back up bullshit claims that they assert.

Usually, but not always. Let's give half-life the benefit of the doubt. I certainly am.
 
Usually, they are lying hypocritical cunts that can only make arguments by using sweeping generalizations and are fucking allergic to citing sources to back up bullshit claims that they assert.

Usually, but not always. Let's give half-life the benefit of the doubt. I certainly am.
But what doubt is there? That's his posting history to a capital T.
 
One in five women and one in 71 men will be raped

at some point in their lives (a)

46.4% lesbians, 74.9% bisexual women and 43.3%

heterosexual women reported sexual violence other

than rape during their lifetimes...


That 1 in 5 number is only from defining as rape experiences the women themselves didn't consider rape, just undesired sex. There's a difference--rape is forced, undesired sex is done for reasons outside the bedroom. (For example, to keep a boyfriend, or to gain something. By their definition basically all prostitution is rape.)
 
This whole thread is about sexism in the guise of scrutiny. An easy way for misogynistic males to avoid the sexism label. A very PASSIVE AGGRESSIVE approach.

Get it?
 
Feminism is about sexism in the guise of scrutiny. An easy way for misandrist females to avoid the sexism label. A very PASSIVE AGGRESSIVE approach.

Get it?

Fixed that for you.

Reminds me of the joke of the woman wearing a shirt that says, "A woman needs a man like a fish needs a bicycle!" and was being mugged and was screaming for help and a man passed by and saw her shirt and said, "oh you don't need a man. You can take care of yourself!" and just kept walking by.

Feminists want both, "I don't need a man!" and "we need men to protect us!"

If feminists really believe we are equal, try tossing the check to the woman on the first date. See how well "equality" goes over, there.
 
Feminism is about sexism in the guise of scrutiny. An easy way for misandrist females to avoid the sexism label. A very PASSIVE AGGRESSIVE approach.

Get it?

Fixed that for you.

Reminds me of the joke of the woman wearing a shirt that says, "A woman needs a man like a fish needs a bicycle!" and was being mugged and was screaming for help and a man passed by and saw her shirt and said, "oh you don't need a man. You can take care of yourself!" and just kept walking by.

Feminists want both, "I don't need a man!" and "we need men to protect us!"

If feminists really believe we are equal, try tossing the check to the woman on the first date. See how well "equality" goes over, there.

Predictable. Can't take any criticism but you sure can nitpick hair split and scrutinize any female.

Why do you hate women so much - ask yourself.
 
If feminists really believe we are equal, try tossing the check to the woman on the first date. See how well "equality" goes over, there.
'Toss' it to her? So, you, the man, decide who has to pay the check? Uh.....huh.

I expect she'll pay it. And having taken your measure, drop you at the curb, happy to have dodged that bullet.
 
If feminists really believe we are equal, try tossing the check to the woman on the first date. See how well "equality" goes over, there.
'Toss' it to her? So, you, the man, decide who has to pay the check? Uh.....huh.

I expect she'll pay it. And having taken your measure, drop you at the curb, happy to have dodged that bullet.

So when the woman tosses the man the check, the man can pay it and drop her at the curb having dodged that bullet?

Cool advice, Keith!
 
If feminists really believe we are equal, try tossing the check to the woman on the first date. See how well "equality" goes over, there.
'Toss' it to her? So, you, the man, decide who has to pay the check? Uh.....huh.

I expect she'll pay it. And having taken your measure, drop you at the curb, happy to have dodged that bullet.

So when the woman tosses the man the check, the man can pay it and drop her at the curb having dodged that bullet?

Cool advice, Keith!
Generally, the person asking the other person out is offering to pay. It's always been my and my dates' understanding.
If you violate this convention, and do not make that intention clear up front, then you are just using feminism as an excuse to be selfish.
If she asks you out, and expects you to pay anyway, then she's being a dick. Drop her and run. Unless you still have some hope for sex. Men will pay a lot if they think dinner counts as foreplay.

But i suspect your dates insist on going Dutch, anyway, to avoid any hint of debt.
 
So when the woman tosses the man the check, the man can pay it and drop her at the curb having dodged that bullet?

Cool advice, Keith!
Generally, the person asking the other person out is offering to pay. It's always been my and my dates' understanding.
If you violate this convention, and do not make that intention clear up front, then you are just using feminism as an excuse to be selfish.
If she asks you out, and expects you to pay anyway, then she's being a dick. Drop her and run. Unless you still have some hope for sex. Men will pay a lot if they think dinner counts as foreplay.

But i suspect your dates insist on going Dutch, anyway, to avoid any hint of debt.

Well, depending on the date, if you agree to old school Dutch beforehand, you agree to pay the other person's bill, thus signaling both trust and respect.

Otherwise it's just "splitting the check", which as you said, is probably a likely outcome for a dinner with Halfie, assumi g they open their mouths and let the locusts out.
 
Reminds me of the joke of the woman wearing a shirt that says, "A woman needs a man like a fish needs a bicycle!" and was being mugged and was screaming for help and a man passed by and saw her shirt and said, "oh you don't need a man. You can take care of yourself!" and just kept walking by.

Feminists want both, "I don't need a man!" and "we need men to protect us!"

If feminists really believe we are equal, try tossing the check to the woman on the first date. See how well "equality" goes over, there.

You have posted a conversation that you fabricated and then claimed it represents all feminists.

I don’t think you have any idea what actual feminists think - since they don’t post on 4chan or wherever you people get your tropes and pleasure each other with tales of victimhood.

No, most feminists would not wear that shirt, and most men would not let a victim of a violent crime continue to be hurt because of a cartoonish view of what equality means.

But I really am struck by how exactly you echo the very words of the other misogynists. Is it a script?
 
Feminism is about sexism in the guise of scrutiny. An easy way for misandrist females to avoid the sexism label. A very PASSIVE AGGRESSIVE approach.

Get it?

Fixed that for you.

Reminds me of the joke of the woman wearing a shirt that says, "A woman needs a man like a fish needs a bicycle!" and was being mugged and was screaming for help and a man passed by and saw her shirt and said, "oh you don't need a man. You can take care of yourself!" and just kept walking by.

Feminists want both, "I don't need a man!" and "we need men to protect us!"

If feminists really believe we are equal, try tossing the check to the woman on the first date. See how well "equality" goes over, there.

Not so much. We don’t want men to protect us from other men. We just want men to quit being violent creeps we need to protect ourselves from.
 
Back
Top Bottom