• Welcome to the Internet Infidels Discussion Board.

Who Agrees Fourth Wave Feminism is Toxic Femininity And Should Be Abolished?

You might want to consider turning off your TV, if you are so easily triggered.

It's not "being triggered" if the leftist agenda is on TV and trying to manipulate people. Imagine if conservatives were in charge of education, television, Hollywood, etc. I'm sure the leftists would be complaining about the conservative agenda as well. So, don't say we have no right to be pissed at the blatant catering to leftists in the media.

You might want to google "Sinclair Broadcast Group" before you go on a bullshit rant on how leftist rule the media. And if you think liberals run education in the US, you are clearly a victim of the selection committee of the Texas Board of Education.
Finally, liberals don't run Hollywood, the Jews do. Ask any American conservative who lived in the 50s or 60s.
 
Up to this point in life, I was aware I have to compete with men who have an advantage because they are taller than I am, but never gave any thought as to how being circumcised weakened my competitiveness with women who never suffered this experience.

Your competitiveness is not 'weakened'. Your body was mutilated.

That which doesn't kill me, makes me stronger, so I guess that covers mutilation as well.

How is that after thousands of generations of circumcision, and in all that time, men held control of practically every aspect of society across the world, men were the ones getting mutilated?
 
How is that after thousands of generations of circumcision, and in all that time, men held control of practically every aspect of society across the world, men were the ones getting mutilated?

So you are saying men have been the ones getting mutilated. That's an interesting claim.
 
Last edited:
What we are beginning to see in America is a war on toxic masculinity. #Me too and #Times up as two notable examples. The usual brush off, "Boys will be boys" no longer will fly as an excuse. No more Harvey Weinsteins or Roger Ailes operating for years with impunity. And the GOP's policies of attacking women's health issues, birth control, destroying Planned Parenthood, eliminating ACA, and trying to avoid re-enacting the Violence Against Women Act and other disreputable actions is going to bite the GOP's butt hard come election day.

We will see a lot of hand wringing about those bad old feminists from the usual crybaby brigade, and their tears will be so enjoyable when the ban hammer comes down on the GOP on election day wielded b angry women voters. We now have only a little longer than a year to wait for this "toxic feminist" reckoning that is surely coming.

I look forward to that day when Trump is swept away by America's women voters like the body of a dead, dried up roach that is swept out of the bathroom remorselessly.

I don't understand you guys. No man in the history of men has ever watched 2 boys bullying each other and said, "Boys will be boys." That's from TV in the Gillette commercial. They showed 2 young kids fighting with each other and about 10 men standing behind their grills outside folded their arms and they all said in unison, "Boys will be boys" as if its some kind of cult. This is why people get upset. I've never said this. No man has. It's a stupid TV cliche. It's not real. What happens when girls bully each other? Do women stand around and say, "Girls will be girls?" Of course not! This is getting so stupid!!!!

This is why Trump is going to win in a landslide. People are getting sick and tired of the leftist agenda treating all men like rapists and bullies. It's degrading and sexist. Men today are certainly getting less masculine and more feminized.

"Boys will be boys" is that little dog whistle that says, "Rape culture, sexual harassment, groping, misogyny?", it is no big deal. Not to us. You can't change anything, it will always be that way because "Boys will be boys". "Now pipe down and accept that this is the way things will always be". That is what the worst aspects of the "Boys will be boys" dog whistle means.

What the Fourth Wave Feminists are saying is, no, that is not going to be the way things are. Again, when women sweep out the Trump administration and the misogynist GOP takes a hit because women are angry, maybe this message will begin to sink in. If not on a rational basis, on an operational basis. You can win elections if America's women hate you and your anti-women policies and attitudes.

The days a Jeffery Epstein or a Harvey Weinstein can operate for years with impunity are going to come to an end.

For the times they are a changing.
 
"Boys will be boys" is that little dog whistle that says, "Rape culture, sexual harassment, groping, misogyny?", it is no big deal. Not to us. You can't change anything, it will always be that way because "Boys will be boys". "Now pipe down and accept that this is the way things will always be". That is what the worst aspects of the "Boys will be boys" dog whistle means.

What the Fourth Wave Feminists are saying is, no, that is not going to be the way things are. Again, when women sweep out the Trump administration and the misogynist GOP takes a hit because women are angry, maybe this message will begin to sink in. If not on a rational basis, on an operational basis. You can win elections if Am
America's women hate you and your anti-women policies and attitudes.

The days a Jeffery Epstein or a Harvey Weinstein can operate for years with impunity are going to come to an end.

For the times they are a changing.

Why is it that the only people who notice these "dog whistles" are leftists who claim not to be racists? I thought the dog whistles are meant to be heard only by the racists and bigots? I didn't hear that phrase as a dog whistle, but you did. So logically, that makes YOU the bigot, doesn't it?

I've seen videos on leftist channels where a white man uses the phrase, "too urban" and in the comments leftists are saying, "it's a dog whistle for black people!" But, I don't associate that word with black people. I associate it with crowded and densely populated areas where it's hard to focus on the individual. Weird how it's always the so-called non-racists who can hear these dog whistles. Perhaps you guys are the true racists.
 
Up to this point in life, I was aware I have to compete with men who have an advantage because they are taller than I am, but never gave any thought as to how being circumcised weakened my competitiveness with women who never suffered this experience.

Your competitiveness is not 'weakened'. Your body was mutilated.

That which doesn't kill me, makes me stronger, so I guess that covers mutilation as well.

How is that after thousands of generations of circumcision, and in all that time, men held control of practically every aspect of society across the world, men were the ones getting mutilated?

How come men invented god to justify it, when there clearly isn't a god? How come men defend it right now, like you are doing? People are irrational, that's why.
 
Again, when women sweep out the Trump administration and the misogynist GOP takes a hit because women are angry, maybe this message will begin to sink in. If not on a rational basis, on an operational basis. You can win elections if America's women hate you and your anti-women policies and attitudes.

Weren't women angry in 2016? Why can't women get their shit together?
 
Some women voted for Trump because their husbands told them to.

Titus, 2:3-5, King James version
3 The aged women likewise, that they be in behaviour as becometh holiness, not false accusers, not given to much wine, teachers of good things;

4 That they may teach the young women to be sober, to love their husbands, to love their children,

5 To be discreet, chaste, keepers at home, good, obedient to their own husbands, that the word of God be not blasphemed.

People still are teaching this, even today.
 
Last edited:
Why is it that the only people who notice these "dog whistles" are leftists who claim not to be racists?

Why you always gotta bring race into everything?

I thought the dog whistles are meant to be heard only by the racists and bigots?
Yeah, that's kinda the point. You hear, you respond, you blame the Left, but never critically examine the claims... So, yeah, dogwhistles.
 
People still are teaching this, even today.
A woman in my hometown thinks that voting should be done by tickets. A family of four gets four tickets. The women give their tickets to the man of the house, who gets to vote 2, 3, 4 times. She likes this idea because
1) they're supposed to vote the way he tells them to, anyway.
2) that way he'll KNOW who they voted for. I guess hubby keeps asking and asking after an election, who she voted for. Trying to trip her up if she's lying. They both understand that God says that he controls her vote...
 
I don't understand you guys.
Truer words were seldom spoken in your posts.
No man in the history of men has ever watched 2 boys bullying each other and said, "Boys will be boys."
Well, you can't really 'bully each other.' That's not what bullying is.
But, yes, people have dismissed violent, predatory bullying by that very phrase.
By suggesting that any boy being bullied NEEDED such treatment, to get tougher.
And by suggesting there was no reason to call the parents, because 'boys will be boys' and there's no reason to make a federal case out of this sort of thing.

You really need to stop talking in absolutes, Halfie.
That's from TV in the Gillette commercial. They showed 2 young kids fighting with each other and about 10 men standing behind their grills outside folded their arms and they all said in unison, "Boys will be boys" as if its some kind of cult. This is why people get upset. I've never said this.
Good for you.
No man has.
Absolute bullshit.
It's a stupid TV cliche.
And you never wondered HOW it came to be a cliché?
Sad.
It's not real.
At best, you might claim 'not in your experience.' But your experiences are not universal.
What happens when girls bully each other? Do women stand around and say, "Girls will be girls?" Of course not!
Was that supposed to be a point? The male cliché is not pansexual, therefore the male cliché isn't real?
 
Again, when women sweep out the Trump administration and the misogynist GOP takes a hit because women are angry, maybe this message will begin to sink in. If not on a rational basis, on an operational basis. You can win elections if America's women hate you and your anti-women policies and attitudes.

Weren't women angry in 2016? Why can't women get their shit together?

Yeah, but they didn't know how bad things would get under Trump and so we had a somewhat lackluster presidential election year. Now, women know better. 2018 was the result. A Democratic wave. All polls and surveys I have seen to date indicate Trump is losing women's votes 2 to 1. Pew for example shows women having only a 31% approval rating for Trump. The war on women's health issue by the GOP over the last three years is going to come back to bite Trump and the GOP. In 2018 women made up 52% of voters, men 48% I see no way Trump is going to turn things around in only one year. This election cycle, it looks like women will finally get their shit together and it spells doom for Trump.

Here in Texas, a recent Quinnapiac polls shows 55% of women will definitely not vote for Trump and 30% will. This drags down Trump among all voters at 48% will definitely not vote for trump and 35% will. Again, this is Texas. Of course there is the question will all these Texas voters vote Democratic or will conservative voters just stay home. Trump's number in other states are just as grim in many cases.

I smell a wipe out coming and women voters this time around are going to spank Trump out of office. Those swing states Trump won by the skin of his teeth are now out of his reach. He won victory by 77,704 votes. And another good survey I saw that was sobering was a poll asking if the government is doing too much or not enough for US citizens. Men overwhelmingly said too much. But a startling 58% of women answer not enough. (Pew) With Trump and the GOP declaring they will be working to eliminate ACA and attack Social Security, Medicare and Medicaid (behind closed doors according to Sen. Joni Ernst) and more, tearing up the safety net, this is a sleeper trend that is going to work against the GOP and Trump on election day. The toxic conservatism of today's GOP is not working with women.

The Halflifes of the world will be very badly disappointed on election day.
 
"Boys will be boys" is that little dog whistle that says, "Rape culture, sexual harassment, groping, misogyny?", it is no big deal. Not to us. You can't change anything, it will always be that way because "Boys will be boys". "Now pipe down and accept that this is the way things will always be". That is what the worst aspects of the "Boys will be boys" dog whistle means.

What the Fourth Wave Feminists are saying is, no, that is not going to be the way things are. Again, when women sweep out the Trump administration and the misogynist GOP takes a hit because women are angry, maybe this message will begin to sink in. If not on a rational basis, on an operational basis. You can win elections if Am
America's women hate you and your anti-women policies and attitudes.

The days a Jeffery Epstein or a Harvey Weinstein can operate for years with impunity are going to come to an end.

For the times they are a changing.

Why is it that the only people who notice these "dog whistles" are leftists who claim not to be racists? I thought the dog whistles are meant to be heard only by the racists and bigots? I didn't hear that phrase as a dog whistle, but you did. So logically, that makes YOU the bigot, doesn't it?

I've seen videos on leftist channels where a white man uses the phrase, "too urban" and in the comments leftists are saying, "it's a dog whistle for black people!" But, I don't associate that word with black people. I associate it with crowded and densely populated areas where it's hard to focus on the individual. Weird how it's always the so-called non-racists who can hear these dog whistles. Perhaps you guys are the true racists.

That dog whistle has been around for ages. Many women know what it means. and how it is used to excuse bad male behavior. It is now worn out and women voters are going to let you know it in 2020. And #Me Too and #Times Up will not be going away any time soon. Keep remaining gloriously clueless. 2020 is going to be a nasty surprise for you and your kind.
 
So... what? If men in the past and present caused the legal advantages that women enjoy, does that mean I have only myself to blame, because I'm a man?

Well you see, you are responsible for everything anyone who is categorized the same as you does or has done, be they your gender or race or whatever. And somehow that itself is not prejudice...
 
So... what? If men in the past and present caused the legal advantages that women enjoy, does that mean I have only myself to blame, because I'm a man?

Well you see, you are responsible for everything anyone who is categorized the same as you does or has done, be they your gender or race or whatever. And somehow that itself is not prejudice...

...says the guy who constantly supports halfie's parody posts about women.
 
Women are in distinct minority and have little power in the Senate. Men dominate the Senate, and the SCOTUS. Right now, the House leader is a woman, but historically up to Ms. Pelosi, it has been run by men.

So... does Pelosi have power or not? Has she affected nothing and effected nothing because she's outnumbered by men?
The fact some women have had some influence does not negate the overwhelming influence of men.


Metaphor said:
So... what? If men in the past and present caused the legal advantages that women enjoy, does that mean I have only myself to blame, because I'm a man?
It means show the same zeal and effort about the legal advantages men have as women in the world if you wish to be taken seriously instead of whining misogynist.
 
...says the guy who constantly supports halfie's parody posts about women.

...While explicitly disagreeing with "Halfie". Reading comprehension is not your strong suit.

Reading comprehension is my strong suit. You fell for his parody thread. Started agreeing and piling on about women. Then you got called on it and so you created one disagreement. Yet here you remain, rearanging chauvinistic deck chairs in a sinking thread.
 
...says the guy who constantly supports halfie's parody posts about women.

...While explicitly disagreeing with "Halfie". Reading comprehension is not your strong suit.

Reading comprehension is my strong suit. You fell for his parody thread. Started agreeing and piling on about women. Then you got called on it and so you created one disagreement. Yet here you remain, rearanging chauvinistic deck chairs in a sinking thread.

You keep calling Half Life a parody. I'm not sure he is. I also disagreed with him before you "called me out", but I have indulged you long enough in your trolling. If you have nothing on topic or interesting to say, you can return to your hole.
 
Back
Top Bottom