• Welcome to the new Internet Infidels Discussion Board, formerly Talk Freethought.

WHY ARE HISTORIANS SO AFRAID OF FUCKING?

Potoooooooo

Contributor
Joined
Dec 4, 2006
Messages
7,004
Location
Floridas
Basic Beliefs
atheist
http://www.vice.com/read/why-are-historians-so-afraid-of-fucking-468


Last month, archaeologists on the Greek island of Ithaca found a couple of dicks etched into a cliff face at the Bay of Vathy. The dongs, as well as an inscription on another rock written in ancient Greek that read “Nikasitimos was here mounting Timiona,” are estimated to be 2,500 years old. The press scrambled to label it among the world’s oldest and most fascinating erotic archaeological finds, but that’s not quite true. Erotica is everywhere in the historical record, and archaeologists have come across sexual displays and descriptions far older and more fascinating than this. What made this particular finding unique was that—in addition to what the scribbles taught them about literacy during the time of Acropolis—the archaeologists were happy to talk about sex, and willing to acknowledge that the inscriptions suggested gay sex wasn’t just an upper-class affair practiced in limited social settings. Academics have only very recently become comfortable discussing sexual aspects of history, and many still avoid it. That's unfortunate, because there's a whole lot of ancient, instructive, and revolutionarily important smut out there.


 
There have been lots of fucking problems in history, so perhaps the desire is to avoid fucking problems that have come up in the past.
 
Yep. Up until recently they had all the naked fucking artwork from ruins in Pompeii and Herculaneum locked up at the museum. Pictures of statues with erect dicks were airbrushed out of textbooks and art books.

But what can you do about graffiti - especially when it's about one guy saying he fucked another guy against this wall?
 
Create better fucking graffiti? Pretty sure there are way more beautiful combinations of beings than multiple guys. Chase sapphire preferred.
 
I wonder how many ancient dildos and how much ancient porn mistakenly got to be associated with fertility cults: "Surely these people weren't jacking off to these scribbles! It must have a deeper, spiritual meaning!"
 
I wonder how many ancient dildos and how much ancient porn mistakenly got to be associated with fertility cults: "Surely these people weren't jacking off to these scribbles! It must have a deeper, spiritual meaning!"

You wouldn't believe how many times I've used that line myself.
 
What memes you think the historians are involved in such censorship? Personally my mo dies in the moral guardians.
 
Stupid autocorrect. Here is what I actually wanted to post;

What makes you think the historians are involved in such censorship? Personally my money is on the moral guardians.
 
Νικασίτιμος οἶφε Τιμίονα Nikastimos oiphe Timiona -- Nikastimos is mounting Timion (not Timiona)

Classical:
Timion, Τιμίων -- nominative (subject) case
Timiona, Τιμίονα -- accusative (object) case

Modern Greek forces most Classical consonant-stem nouns into vowel-stem declensions: Classical Ἀκταίων (Actaeon), Modern Ακταίωνας (Actaeonas), so that likely accounts for the error.

Gregory in Seattle linked to this page: Nestor's Cup: Six Dirty Words
οἴφω (or οἰφῶ)

This is generally considered a Doric equivalent of the word βινῶ, although it was certainly adopted by non-Doric speakers.
That one is
βινῶ (or βενῶ)

According to Bain, this was the primary vulgar term for intercourse throughout antiquity, and so would probably correspond to the word fuck. The word is no longer in use in the Greek language, and its origin is uncertain.

 Ancient Greek grammar (tables)
 
Back
Top Bottom