Did you go by the same name in the old forum? I have always been Sarpedon.
Thanks! You probably don't remember because it wasn't any big deal to you. But it impressed me that an atheist would invite a Christian to their forum so it stuck with me - until I started overwriting brain tracks due to lack of free storage
Ruth
What an odd premise for a thread.I know that many of you question why someone would join this forum if they are really Christian.
What an odd premise for a thread.I know that many of you question why someone would join this forum if they are really Christian.
I don't recall anyone challenging a Christain for posting on this forum, just for the sake of their being Christain.
I think we're all pretty open to the idea that there are topics which attract people who want to discuss them.
Now, on a case by case basis, i have seen individual posters questioned, because their stated goals seem to be at odds with the contents of their posts. Or they may seem to be challenging the atheists to disprove god, while playing a game of keep-away with their own beliefs, or the reasons for those beliefs. Then one might as THAT PERSON why they're a member.
But I don't think that being washed in the blood of the lamb would or should limit the kinds of forums you're allowed to post on.
On the other hand, I have seen MANY theists insist that the very fact atheists discuss religion somehow weakens their claim to be atheists. If i really didn't believe in gods, they feel, i'd completely ignore the topic. This position, of course, strikes me as a teensy bit moronic. I discuss Star Trek without even slightly thinking it's real, i discuss Star Wars, also without thinking it's real. I write bible fanfiction without thinking that any of the characters on the Ark were real. I can discuss membership in and the theology that drives the Flat Earth society without even slightly thinking, hey, maybe they have a point.
But, well, a belated welcome to the board, Ruth. For whatever your reasons are...
Star Wars is an interesting Saga. I discuss it without believing most of it is real. The force is of course very real, and we all know that. But yes, now that Disney has it, there will be no end. Star wars could have died, but the Saga continues. Largely because of critics, if you think about it.
Ready to test your faith?
There are many gods and religions. Most people did not choose the ones they have, these things were chosen for them while they were very young.Ready to test your faith?
I am still not sure why you are asking this - why is it necessary for my faith to be tested in whatever manner you think is appropriate? You have to know that I would consider it a waste of time. I am not trying to be offensive here; I just want to know what benefit you think this will have for either of us.
Thus... 'belated.'Thanks for the welcome, but I am not really new. I have been lurking here for over a decade now
Well, wouldn't it be proper to question someone's qualifications as a Christain if their actions are at odds with their stated theology?And you are right about the thread title and initial opening. I was guilty of knowing what I was thinking and expecting everyone else to know by osmosis or something. A more accurate title and opening would be "Why would anyone who is a Christian want to be a member here?" and then expanding a little on my statement about having seen members question whether or not someone is really Christian because of their actions or accuse them of joining simply to denigrate atheists because of their attitude.
Primary? Not ALL?I don't think it is the least bit strange that atheists would enjoy discussing religion and theology. It is a fascinating topic with all of its differing views and permutations. And hey - I like Star Trek too! A small hint how much I like it would be the fact that my primary email address contains the word "starship"
Yes. I'm particularly proud of "Why are there no unicorns?" which got listed on Gawd-Awful-Fan-Fiction. Although some of the things the reviewer took exception to were not my fault... I mean, the character's name IS Ham. And i didn't even make a Ham sandwich joke...You write bible fanfiction?
There are many gods and religions. Most people did not choose the ones they have, these things were chosen for them while they were very young.I am still not sure why you are asking this - why is it necessary for my faith to be tested in whatever manner you think is appropriate? You have to know that I would consider it a waste of time. I am not trying to be offensive here; I just want to know what benefit you think this will have for either of us.
Think of something we absolutely choose on our own. This is how a religion - or no religion - should be acquired.
Thus... 'belated.'Well, wouldn't it be proper to question someone's qualifications as a Christain if their actions are at odds with their stated theology?And you are right about the thread title and initial opening. I was guilty of knowing what I was thinking and expecting everyone else to know by osmosis or something. A more accurate title and opening would be "Why would anyone who is a Christian want to be a member here?" and then expanding a little on my statement about having seen members question whether or not someone is really Christian because of their actions or accuse them of joining simply to denigrate atheists because of their attitude.
I mean, you can't say that something is anathema to you if you participate in it, can you?
But in general, i still think that no one questions a Christain on the forum just because of their Christain status.
On an individual basis, sincerity is questioned, but we also do that with Syed, so it's not an 'atheists vs. Christain' thing.
Primary? Not ALL?I don't think it is the least bit strange that atheists would enjoy discussing religion and theology. It is a fascinating topic with all of its differing views and permutations. And hey - I like Star Trek too! A small hint how much I like it would be the fact that my primary email address contains the word "starship"
Dilettante... D)
Yes. I'm particularly proud of "Why are there no unicorns?" which got listed on Gawd-Awful-Fan-Fiction. Although some of the things the reviewer took exception to were not my fault... I mean, the character's name IS Ham. And i didn't even make a Ham sandwich joke...You write bible fanfiction?
http://books.adult-fanfiction.org/story.php?no=600093423
And "God dictates in mysterious ways"
http://books.adult-fanfiction.org/story.php?no=544203648
ANd if you've ever seen 'Skippy’s List: The 213 things Skippy is no longer allowed to do in the U.S. Army'
http://skippyslist.com/list/
I have 'Things Rev Skippy can no longer do on the Pulpit'
http://books.adult-fanfiction.org/story.php?no=544208231
Apparently, then, belief of this type must be part of your ontology, and so you can come to a choice. I was not such a proactive searcher, but rather just a curious observer, and remain a curious observer to this day. There are no religions that base themselves on being curious and making observations so I will likely remain nonreligious.There are many gods and religions. Most people did not choose the ones they have, these things were chosen for them while they were very young.
Think of something we absolutely choose on our own. This is how a religion - or no religion - should be acquired.
Ah. If that is what he means, then I have already done that. I spent many years investigating a wide range of different faiths. That includes Wicca, Buddhism, Judaism (you might think this doesn't count since Christianity sprang from that one), and minor studies on several things such as polytheism, Zoroastrianism, and gnosticism. I even did a study on atheism. I started these studies when I was in my early teens. I did not attend church at that time on a regular basis. And I wound up a Christian; specifically, a Baptist after a study on differing Christian denominations. I have been a member of a Baptist church for about 20 years now. And if you try to add those 20 years to the age I was when I started my studies to come up with my age, you will be way off
Is that what you were after, none?
Ruth