No, it's not even "that kind of sex". Only the explicit choice to get pregnant is that choice. IF AND ONLY IF someone explicitly decides "I wish to be pregnant" is that choice made, and only insofar as they wish to continue to be, right up to the point where waffling would cause a living maimed child to fall on someone else's mercy.
I see that as evil.
Like driving away after hitting a pedestrian with your car because you didn't choose to be the cause of a fatality. They walked into your car. Why should you bother with them? You got a right to drive your car. If they bleed out on the pavement that is their choice.
That's how I see your ethics.
Tom
Because hit and run is illegal. You are under no legal obligation to render aid, nor ethical obligation. You are painting ethically neutral decisions as evil.
Your obligation is to be observed for the fact that you hit a pedestrian, and to call the authorities to say a pedestrian is hit.
But the driver is not obligated to get out, nor render aid. Their obligation is to report their reckless driving to society, and stay put. People present a desire and power to give mercy to the struck pedestrian and even if the driver refuses to give that mercy, it is the right of others to come in and offer it and to have the knowledge that it is there to offer.
It is not my responsibility to let a zygote grow, even if I make a billion of them.
The decision to have sex is not the decision to let a zygote implant in your body. It is not the decision to be pregnant. It is not ever the decision to be pregnant.
The only thing that is a decision to be pregnant is the explicit decision to be so. Even if that decision to be so might involve sex, the sex is still not the decision.
Anything else is being forced to be pregnant.