I will admit that Trump's blatant sociopathy, or rather, the danger it posed, was not nearly so obvious prior to the election as it was once he took office, anyone with even casual observational skills was aware that he was a malignant sociopath who cared only about himself and his own ego long before he even considered running for POTUS.
Perhaps. I would argue that some level of sociopathy is present in most politicians.
You nicely illustrated the point of exactly why some voters preferred Bernie over Warren and yes, it definitely has to do with gender.
Bullshit. You want to make everything about gender when Bernie and Warren have very different personalities, and Bernie's is just far more appealing.
No male candidate will ever be referred to as 'schoolmarmy'
No, of course not. A schoolmarm is a woman, so that particular word would be applied to women. Duh.
A man exhibiting similar traits would be compared maybe to a strict headmaster character.
even when they are Bernie who is very school marmy with a loud voice and a lot of spittle but with a penis and testicles.
How is Bernie schoolmarmy? He comes across as passionate, not schoolmarmy or headmasterly at all.
Again, Bernie and Warren have very different personalities.
Bernie stands before his audience and shouts at---no, DOWN at them, spittle flying and finger wagging.
In my opinion Liz is lecturing DOWN on people.
But Bernie got to be the beloved cranky old grandpa instead of the schoolmarmy old woman. Yes, gender did play a role just as race played a role in the Clinton/Obama mash up. One only needed to listen to/read supporters of each for detail and some casual sexism/casual racism became apparent among some, certainly not all, supporters of each.
Given that these people have supporters in the millions, of course some of them are bound to be sexist or racist.
You, however, are trying to reduce difference in popularity between Bernie and Liz to their gender, and that won't work.
The difference is due to their personalities, not gender.
The fact that Warren allowed herself to be drawn into a no-win argument with Trump over her family legend did point out her main weakness. Bernie would have just shouted and pointed his finger and the issue would have died.
Another example is when she claimed that Bernie said that a woman could not win and the whole conflict between them over it.
She did not come off very good there either.
BTW, genetic data bases have insufficient NA DNA samples to make any of those services reliable for determining NA ancestry.
Not to mention that Amerinds are from Siberia, which means that people indigenous to eastern Eurasia would share a lot of haplogroups with Amerinds.
Native Americans themselves do NOT use DNA to establish membership.
Many probably do not even believe in DNA.