So you used a bullshit inference and then attempted to temper it with something else?
I think what happened was a poster asked
@Oleg to back up his argument with a real life example. When Oleg did, it was dismissed as an anecdote.
Tom
Oleg implies that children getting surgeries simply because they put their mom's shoes on.
Asked to demonstrate that is true.
Oleg posts an article (after a presumably very very very short search) about a medicine that is prescribed off label to prevent unusually EARLY onset of puberty. A medicine that some (half according a study) went on to help attempt to delay puberty when it should be happening to help encourage taller height growth (what doctor stands by that plan?!).
Oleg and TomC tl;dr the article and base their opinions on what it says from the article title. Of which none of it was about parents mistaking Tommy wearing mommy's shoes as a clear sign they are trans and go to get him... her fixed.
This is getting so repetitive and tedious.