Rather like the cheerleaders taking credit when the other side fumbles the ball and loses the big game.Can conservatism take credit for the rapid collapse of communism back in the late '80's and early '90's?
Not to discount all the non-pinko-commies such as Lech Walesa who helped the process along, but the main reason for the rapid collapse was that the Soviet politburo system mistakenly allowed supreme power to fall into the hands of a pinko commie who against all odds was not a bastard, but a decent human being, so he wasn't willing to perpetrate the level of violence against his own people it took to hold onto that power.Some might say that was a good thing for the world (though I know many of you pinko commie bastards would disagree).
Rather like the cheerleaders taking credit when the other side fumbles the ball and loses the big game.Can conservatism take credit for the rapid collapse of communism back in the late '80's and early '90's?
Not to discount all the non-pinko-commies such as Lech Walesa who helped the process along, but the main reason for the rapid collapse was that the Soviet politburo system mistakenly allowed supreme power to fall into the hands of a pinko commie who against all odds was not a bastard, but a decent human being, so he wasn't willing to perpetrate the level of violence against his own people it took to hold onto that power.Some might say that was a good thing for the world (though I know many of you pinko commie bastards would disagree).
We all know Sylvester Stallone and Ronnie Raygun took down the USSR and the Berlin Wall.
If I were any sort of artist, I'd draw Reagan in a cheerleader outfit waving his pompoms while the wall came down behind him.Come on, comrade Bomb. We all know Sylvester Stallone and Ronnie Raygun took down the USSR and the Berlin Wall.
Our tradition was always that certain people weren't welcome. Irish, Chinese, Jews, Moslems (that tradition brought back by Trump), black people unless they are slaves. Our tradition has always been "those" people aren't welcome, despite what that French bitch in the New York harbor has to say.I think it is weasaly, but he isn't actually wrong when he does this.
How liberal and progressive!
It is weasely to use words as though they have meaning.
Like the OP, @ZiprHead.
Apparently here in the modern world, if the meaning of a word doesn't suit your ideology then you just flip it to mean what you prefer that it means. It's quite Orwellian, turning Trump's Wall into Conservativism. The USA has been "This Nation of Immigrants" since before there was an official USA. The Wall is a newfangled attempt to end our old tradition. That's not conservative by any standard except modern Orwellian "Words mean what I want them to mean, for my own ideological purposes."
That sounds really progressive to me.
Tom
Um, quick question: what planet are you on? Stalin was a paranoid homicidal maniac. For the love of god, the man had execution quotas! People were arrested at random just to meet the quotas, or to terrorize the population. And in addition to Ukrainians, 250,000 more were shot for being of some other suspect ethnicity.Yes, a great deal has changed.Russia still has a dictatorship, that kills its political enemies, and just like in Stalin's time, they still are killing Ukrainians, so has much of anything really changed there?
Not all dictatorships are the same. Stalin's rule was one of strict authority; There were laws (written and unwritten), and while some may have been impossible to avoid breaking, a person who obeyed the laws and toed the line was basically safe.
Our tradition was always
Wrong. History announces what our tradition always was.Our tradition was always
I suppose that, as a WASPy heterosexual male with money, you feel entitled to announce what "our" tradition always was.
Who better to explain what 'Murica stands for?
Tom
Wrong. History announces what our tradition always was.Our tradition was always
I suppose that, as a WASPy heterosexual male with money, you feel entitled to announce what "our" tradition always was.
Who better to explain what 'Murica stands for?
Tom
If you think the history I described is wrong you should disprove it with facts instead of being insulting.Wrong. History announces what our tradition always was.Our tradition was always
I suppose that, as a WASPy heterosexual male with money, you feel entitled to announce what "our" tradition always was.
Who better to explain what 'Murica stands for?
Tom
"History"?
You mean the story written by the victors?
Tom
Who better to explain what 'Murica stands for?
That appears to be the answer I got.Who better to explain what 'Murica stands for?
I think the standard answer is “me!”.
Actually that sounds like your answer.That appears to be the answer I got.Who better to explain what 'Murica stands for?
I think the standard answer is “me!”.
Tom
Instead of making half-assed statements about others. how about actually making an intelligent and fact based argument for your position?
Sure, but being of the wrong ethnicity was against the law, so they were failing to obey the law (albeit a law that it was impossible to avoid breaking).Um, quick question: what planet are you on? Stalin was a paranoid homicidal maniac. For the love of god, the man had execution quotas! People were arrested at random just to meet the quotas, or to terrorize the population. And in addition to Ukrainians, 250,000 more were shot for being of some other suspect ethnicity.Yes, a great deal has changed.Russia still has a dictatorship, that kills its political enemies, and just like in Stalin's time, they still are killing Ukrainians, so has much of anything really changed there?
Not all dictatorships are the same. Stalin's rule was one of strict authority; There were laws (written and unwritten), and while some may have been impossible to avoid breaking, a person who obeyed the laws and toed the line was basically safe.
That's a lot of words to convey straight up bullshit. Your semantic argument is just a waste of time.Instead of making half-assed statements about others. how about actually making an intelligent and fact based argument for your position?
The word "conservatism", as used in the OP, is worse than meaningless.
It's a misuse of a word for ideological purposes. It's turning a word around to serve what you want people to believe.
Whatever you, ZiprHead, don't like is "conservative". Whatever you like is "progressive". It positively Orwellian the way you change the words around.
50 year old policies are progressive. Ending old traditions, older than this country itself, is conservative.
Sorry dude. If you can't explain what you mean by "conservatism" more clearly than "stuff I don't like", we can't have an intelligent conversation on the subject.
Tom
How liberal and progressive of you to say.That's a lot of words to convey straight up bullshit. Your semantic argument is just a waste of time.
I'm just wondering why there are still people using words like "pinko" and "commie" unironically. What year is it?We all know Sylvester Stallone and Ronnie Raygun took down the USSR and the Berlin Wall.
Yeah, they looked at it funny and told Gorby to take down that wall, and down it came. And now it’s turning into the very same top heavy piece of shit that it was when the wall came down and Pootey was holed up in the Berlin Soviet HQ.
If you're talking about thebeave and me, we were using them for humorous effect. Did you miss theI'm just wondering why there are still people using words like "pinko" and "commie" unironically. What year is it?