Will Trump finally be indicted in Georgia?

[Jason Harvestdancer]

I thought you blocked me because I dared ask you to support a statement you made.

No, I blocked you for failure to be an honest broker in discussion.

How is asking you to back up a statement you made "failure to be an honest broker in discussion"? One would think the person who makes assertions like you do without backing them up may be the one at fault.

Now you accuse me, sans evidence, of hating America. I would ask you to support that claim, but know you would block me if I did so. And complain to the mods.

 

[TomC]

Yet you comment anyway.

I commented on your dodge. Your demonstrably false statement followed by a weak dodge about someone else's use of <ignore>.
That's what I'm commenting on.
Tom

 

[Jason Harvestdancer]

Yet you comment anyway.

I commented on your dodge. Your demonstrably false statement followed by a weak dodge about someone else's use of <ignore>.
That's what I'm commenting on.
Tom

I don't know what "demonstrably false statement" you are referring to.

 

[TomC]

Yet you comment anyway.

I commented on your dodge. Your demonstrably false statement followed by a weak dodge about someone else's use of <ignore>.
That's what I'm commenting on.
Tom

I don't know what "demonstrably false statement" you are referring to.

Here's the one Elixir quoted:

The people who brought these are also professional politicos, so they have no character and professionalism to defame.

It's one of many, but that's the one we're talking about here.
Tom

 

[Jason Harvestdancer]

Oh. You see blasphemy and want to call me on it.

You actually believe that people inside the government have high integrity.

 

[TomC]

Oh. You see blasphemy and want to call me on it.

You actually believe that people inside the government have high integrity.

That's still a dodge and not much better.
Tom

 

[Jason Harvestdancer]

Oh. You see blasphemy and want to call me on it.

You actually believe that people inside the government have high integrity.

That's still a dodge and not much better.
Tom

No, not really. You honestly think that calling out government personnel as government personnel is a dodge, because they are high and holy operatives of the one true faith. My blasphemy offends you.

 

[TomC]

No, not really. You honestly think that calling out government personnel as government personnel is a dodge, because they are high and holy operatives of the one true faith. My blasphemy offends you.

OMFG

Now you're a martyr?
Just explain why you think that the members of the grand jury that indicted Trump are such awful people.


Tom

 

[Jason Harvestdancer]

No, not really. You honestly think that calling out government personnel as government personnel is a dodge, because they are high and holy operatives of the one true faith. My blasphemy offends you.

OMFG

Now you're a martyr?

Tom

No, your offense at my blasphemy doesn't hurt me.

 

[Copernicus]

No, not really. You honestly think that calling out government personnel as government personnel is a dodge, because they are high and holy operatives of the one true faith. My blasphemy offends you.

OMFG

Now you're a martyr?

Tom

No, your offense at my blasphemy doesn't hurt me.

It's interesting that Jason answered the rhetorical question posed by TomC and snipped out the interesting request. Here was how he snipped it:

Now you're a martyr?
Just explain why you think that the members of the grand jury that indicted Trump are such awful people.

Apparently, the snipped request did hurt too much to answer.

 

[ZiprHead]

Yet you comment anyway.

I commented on your dodge. Your demonstrably false statement followed by a weak dodge about someone else's use of <ignore>.
That's what I'm commenting on.
Tom

I don't know what "demonstrably false statement" you are referring to.

Jesus Christ! For once in your life maybe you can sack up and answer a question. And you wonder why people think you are a troll.

 

[T.G.G. Moogly]

The people who brought these are also professional politicos, so they have no character and professionalism to defame.

The grand jurors then. Ordinary citizens who actually saw the evidence. Having seen the truth makes them Politicos now, according to RW Trumpsucking extremists.

I thought you blocked me because I dared ask you to support a statement you made.

So much deflection. So little substance.

 

[Elixir]

Jason is blathering as usual - why I have him on ignore.
I do hope that someone more interested in helping him than I am, will help him examine the reason he so hates the 48 ordinary American citizens who voted UNANIMOUSLY in FOUR DIFFERENT CASES to indict Jason’s boy.

Apparently Jason is ignorant of how an indictment comes to be. Someone should tip him off:

A grand jury listens to the prosecutor and witnesses, and then votes in secret on whether they believe that enough evidence exists to charge the person with a crime.

WHY DOES JASON HATE ORDINARY AMERICAN CITIZENS SO MUCH?

 

[scombrid]

Yes, all of the grand jury members and all of the judges that tossed Rudi and Co. out of court for their bullshit are Soros! controlled NWO shills that hate freedom.

 

[laughing dog]

While it is true that America is full of Americans, asking whether one hates honest Americans (the question posed in post 339) is not the same as asking whether one hates America.

 

[Jarhyn]

Oh. You see blasphemy and want to call me on it.

You actually believe that people inside the government have high integrity.

Ok, let's unpack this nonsense a bit: Jason believes people inside the government do not have high integrity.

I would go further and say I think Jason believes people in general do not have high integrity, based on this; people 'in the government' have no more or less reason to lack integrity, after all.

I wonder, though, what basis someone could have for making this proclamation. I can think of a few, but the shiny mirror Jason looks in while they post seems the most likely one.

Most people are mostly right most of the time. Then, Jason is not "most people".

 

[Elixir]

Jason believes people inside the government do not have high integrity.

He is far from unique in that regard.

I think Jason believes people in general do not have high integrity

He certainly seems to think that random American citizens are in the thrall of The Deep State or whatever boogeyman haunts his shallow thoughts. If that was not the case I believe he would have tried to respond to the fact that (at least) 48 ordinary American citizens unanimously decided, after viewing the evidence, that Donald Trump should be indicted on 91 counts in four jurisdictions.

Not to jump to conclusions, but I have long known that most people who see (almost) all others as dishonest, are themselves lacking in forthrightness.

 

[Shadowy Man]

Oh. You see blasphemy and want to call me on it.

You actually believe that people inside the government have high integrity.

Ok, let's unpack this nonsense a bit: Jason believes people inside the government do not have high integrity.

He actually moved the goalposts with his response. He went from proclaiming they had no character or professionalism *at all* to saying that didn’t have “high” integrity, whatever that means.

There appears to be no middle ground between perfection and pure villainy, despite virtually all of humanity lying between these two extremes.

 

[TomC]

It's interesting that Jason answered the rhetorical question posed by TomC and snipped out the interesting request.

Full Disclosure: I edited that in during the few seconds it took @Jason Harvestdancer to post his response.
Nevertheless, he is still dodging the question.
Tom

 

[Jimmy Higgins]

Oh. You see blasphemy and want to call me on it.

You actually believe that people inside the government have high integrity.

That's still a dodge and not much better.
Tom

No, not really. You honestly think that calling out government personnel as government personnel is a dodge, because they are high and holy operatives of the one true faith. My blasphemy offends you.

So broad brush, multiple strawman, and false accusation stuffed into two sentences. Can this derail be smoked out of the thread?