• Welcome to the Internet Infidels Discussion Board.

McCarthy opens impeachment inquiry

I know you say you didn’t vote for Trump, and I believe you. But it remains that you deride Biden constantly and Trump not at all. So you can’t blame people for thinking “Trump supporter” when they read your body of work.

Biden is the one in office. Trump isn't.

Now Elixir, as is his wont, didn't write his accusation as a suspicion but as a fact. Do you think he'll even bother to give an argument that is even half as good as the halfhearted one you offered?
 
I know you say you didn’t vote for Trump, and I believe you. But it remains that you deride Biden constantly and Trump not at all. So you can’t blame people for thinking “Trump supporter” when they read your body of work.

Biden is the one in office. Trump isn't.
Darling. We’ve been posting together for nigh on 20 years.
 
I know you say you didn’t vote for Trump, and I believe you. But it remains that you deride Biden constantly and Trump not at all. So you can’t blame people for thinking “Trump supporter” when they read your body of work.

Biden is the one in office. Trump isn't.
Darling. We’ve been posting together for nigh on 20 years.
When Bush was in office I criticized him as a warmongering sociopathic neocon mass-murderer. When Obama was in office I criticized him for being Bush. Trump, being rather different, had different criticisms which I did make. Now we're back to Bush-Obama-Biden-"kill them all" foreign policy.

In fact, if you decide to try hard to remember from our 20 years of posting, you might recall that in 2007 I was very disappointed that Nancy Pelosi declared impeachment "off the table". I criticized her for not attacking Bush. Try to unravel that one.
 
When I criticize the Republicans, like saying Bush and his Neocon cabal were a bunch of mass-murdering sociopaths that should be sent to the Hague, it doesn't even rise above the noise floor for this forum.
So you criticise what Republicans did two decades ago, but nothing since. Totally checks out. Both sides and all that.

You remind me of people who couldn't bring themselves to vote for Obama back in 2008, but still consider themselves Democrats because they voted for Carter.
 
I know you say you didn’t vote for Trump, and I believe you. But it remains that you deride Biden constantly and Trump not at all. So you can’t blame people for thinking “Trump supporter” when they read your body of work.

Biden is the one in office. Trump isn't.
Darling. We’ve been posting together for nigh on 20 years.
When Bush was in office I criticized him as a warmongering sociopathic neocon mass-murderer. When Obama was in office I criticized him for being Bush. Trump, being rather different, had different criticisms which I did make. Now we're back to Bush-Obama-Biden-"kill them all" foreign policy.

In fact, if you decide to try hard to remember from our 20 years of posting, you might recall that in 2007 I was very disappointed that Nancy Pelosi declared impeachment "off the table". I criticized her for not attacking Bush. Try to unravel that one.
Amigo, I've also been posting on this forum for about 22 years (was under a different name for a while). I don't remember you condemning Bush much. Not that I would super pay attention to that. But I do remember thinking it seemed ironic to me that you were so harsh on Obama. I don't remember you smacking down Bush much. I remember remarking that Bush was so much worse. But getting pushback from you. Your hatred of Obama just seemed out of whack. You claim that you are anti-war (hence you don't like the dems? ooookay). But I never hear you criticizing Russia. I've never heard you talk about expansionist China. There are a few posters on this forum who are against all military actions of any kind. I respect that. I apologize if I'm misrepresenting your position.
 
Jesus Christ!
And did you know that Biden supports totally open borders so that cartels can bring in lots of fentanyl for children in day cares. Okay. Biden didn't really poison the child that died of fentanyl in the day care, but too many Americans believe that other shit.
Just about exactly 3 years ago, I was working a shit job at a grocery store gas station. It wasn't much, but it was a job...something that a lot of people lost during the pandemic. One of my co-workers was Kelly. Like me, she'd lost a good paying job and was stuck closing down a gas station a few nights a week. She'd lost pretty much everything, and didn't even have a car, so I'd give her a ride home when needed. She was a tough bitch. Her daughter worked at the main store for a bit, and I'd met her a few times, but she was a "troubled youth" and didn't stay there very long. Then one day, Kelly didn't show up for work and I had to close the store myself. Her daughter had gone missing. Something about a boyfriend and moving to Texas, and then...nothing. A few days later Kelly showed up for a minute, and the tough bitch I knew looked utterly broken. Her daughter's body had been found in Texas...dead from a fentanyl overdose. She was 21.

Trump supporters would tell you that it was Joe Biden's fault. That he's the one who opened the borders and let all the fentanyl into the country. Yet if you paid attention to the time frame, you'd know that Trump was President in September of 2020.

This is what we're up against. Everything bad that happens is all Joe Biden's fault...even if he wasn't President back then, but at the same time, Trump is and has always been President, and as such is not liable for any of the actions he took while in office.
 
Amigo, I've also been posting on this forum for about 22 years (was under a different name for a while). I don't remember you condemning Bush much.

As one of the most anti-war posters on this forum, that's your problem.

But I do remember thinking it seemed ironic to me that you were so harsh on Obama.

Calling him "Bush's third term" was pretty harsh.

You claim that you are anti-war (hence you don't like the dems? ooookay).

The war party isn't in just one party.

But I never hear you criticizing Russia. I've never heard you talk about expansionist China. There are a few posters on this forum who are against all military actions of any kind. I respect that. I apologize if I'm misrepresenting your position.

I'm not a citizen of Russia or China, I do not pay taxes to Russia or China, and their leaders do not claim to represent me. If I were a citizen of Russia, I would be critical of their deployments of their military outside their border, but I'm not. My position is, has been, and will continue to be that US military action is only justified against threats against the US. I'm a rare voice on this forum for having that position.

Also, China and Russia are really only threats to their immediate neighbors. There is only one country in the world that has capability and feels justified in bombing anywhere in the world at any time.
 

Trump supporters would tell you that it was Joe Biden's fault. That he's the one who opened the borders and let all the fentanyl into the country. Yet if you paid attention to the time frame, you'd know that Trump was President in September of 2020.

This is what we're up against. Everything bad that happens is all Joe Biden's fault...even if he wasn't President back then, but at the same time, Trump is and has always been President, and as such is not liable for any of the actions he took while in office.
Fool!

Don't you know Biden used a time machine to let it in!
 
Jesus Christ!

article said:
The survey of 1,636 U.S. adults, which was conducted from Sept. 14 to 18, shows that just 37% of Americans currently believe Biden should be impeached, while essentially the same number (36%) say he should be “removed from office through impeachment.”
So slightly more than 1 in 3 Americans polled think Biden should be removed from office because... umm...

But that isn't the problem. Okay... it isn't a problem, but not the problem. This is.

article said:
In contrast, a plurality of Americans think Biden should not be impeached (42%) or removed from office (45%). About one in five say they are not sure.
Yes, that's right. Less than 50% of Americans polled think Biden should not be removed from office. WTF?!

I'm uncertain about the remaining 20%. Is that we are so stupid we can't have opinions or people wondering... I'm uncertain, I must have missed what Biden did. He did something... right?!

Less than half of Americans polled think Biden shouldn't be removed from office. That is insane! There not only is effectively no evidence that Biden has done anything wrong, there isn't any actual coherent accusation!

Trump was impeached from trying to forced a foreign leader to lie about a non-existent investigation into Biden in order to get access to defense funds passed by Congress (which isn't legal). Then he was impeached for instigating a riot on January 6th. Biden is being inquired because umm... the GOP has allegedly had access to a hard drive from Hunter Biden's computer for years now and they have naughty photos of him doing stuff (like drugs and sex, possibly performing air guitar). And less than 50% of Americans think Biden shouldn't be removed from office. What the bleeping heck happened to this country?
It doesn’t matter, as a matter of law, how popular with the electorate an impeachment proceeding is. If a government official has committed an impeachable offense, and Congress has the will and evidence to back charges, to do so, that person should be impeached—assuming the law is just. Being held accountable is not the same thing as a popularity contest.

For example, if there were credible evidence that POTUS was selling government secrets for personal gain, then impeachment proceedings should be held.

But what seems to be happening now is that the right wing nut job faction of the GOP is doing whatever it can to dirty the reputation of the sitting POTUS in order to spoil his chances at re-election—something they claimed the Dems did to Trump. Impeachment is being used as a political tool rather than as a rarely used instrument to ensure that power is held accountable.
 
Amigo, I've also been posting on this forum for about 22 years (was under a different name for a while). I don't remember you condemning Bush much.

As one of the most anti-war posters on this forum, that's your problem.

But I do remember thinking it seemed ironic to me that you were so harsh on Obama.

Calling him "Bush's third term" was pretty harsh.

You claim that you are anti-war (hence you don't like the dems? ooookay).

The war party isn't in just one party.

But I never hear you criticizing Russia. I've never heard you talk about expansionist China. There are a few posters on this forum who are against all military actions of any kind. I respect that. I apologize if I'm misrepresenting your position.

I'm not a citizen of Russia or China, I do not pay taxes to Russia or China, and their leaders do not claim to represent me. If I were a citizen of Russia, I would be critical of their deployments of their military outside their border, but I'm not. My position is, has been, and will continue to be that US military action is only justified against threats against the US. I'm a rare voice on this forum for having that position.

Also, China and Russia are really only threats to their immediate neighbors. There is only one country in the world that has capability and feels justified in bombing anywhere in the world at any time.
Here's the irony here: you claim to be anti-war. However, if the US government buried its head in the sand as you advocate, the world would be in much much greater conflict and war than today. You're okay with China and Russia invading only their immediate neighbors? Which ones are you okay with? I assume Taiwan and Ukraine are to be absorbed and its people thrown in gulags in your world view. How about the rest of Eastern Europe? And then what do you think the rest of Europe and Japan and South Korea would do in the US vacuum? They would dramatically rearm, add nukes and every other form of warfare that they could develop to stop the invaders. But you think you would be safe in your bubble of American isolation that you advocate? Doubtful. Clearly the rest of the world would be in chaos and conflict. You'd really want that?

The only way to stop war is to encourage stronger countries from not invading smaller ones. It's that simple. How to do this? Make it too costly for them. Band together. Create economic and defense alliances that will encourage the big guys to avoid war. Russia would not have invaded Ukraine if it had been in Nato. If Nato breaks up, which is a very real possibility if Trump gets elected, Europe will be in war again. Russia wants the Baltics, Finland, Poland and other countries. Your positions are not anti-war.
 
Now we find that maybe possibly it could be

… that Trump is actually King of the Lizard People. But you voted for him anyway!

Citation needed.



Since he blocks people who ask him to support one of his claims, I wonder how long after reading this it will take for him to reblock me.
I know you say you didn’t vote for Trump, and I believe you. But it remains that you deride Biden constantly and Trump not at all. So you can’t blame people for thinking “Trump supporter” when they read your body of work.
Has Jason ever offered who he DID vote for?
I suspect Lyndon LaRouche.
 
Amigo, I've also been posting on this forum for about 22 years (was under a different name for a while). I don't remember you condemning Bush much.
As one of the most anti-war posters on this forum, that's your problem.
Mine too. I remember Harry Bosch's posts back then being a bit more conservative (maybe moderate and I was more liberal). I don't remember you being "anti-war".
But I do remember thinking it seemed ironic to me that you were so harsh on Obama.
Calling him "Bush's third term" was pretty harsh.
I'd go with ridiculous rather than harsh. The whole comparing Syria, Libya, other military matters and comparing it to the guy who mobilized near 200,000 troops to invade Iraq seems (10,000 or so seriously maimed or killed US troops), well, oversimplified to the point of being ridiculous!
You claim that you are anti-war (hence you don't like the dems? ooookay).
The war party isn't in just one party.
Indeed, the issue, however, is you historical nature to equate any military power as "war". Democrat Presidents meddle, definitely. But the term "war" is used by you in such a way, hippies would probably accuse you of hyperbole. The appropriate term would probably be "military force", but you want to rag on government from your pedestal.
 
Putin is famous for hiring troll-bot farms to spread pro-Trump lies on social media. Is that where barbos gets his "information"?
Possibly.

Or maybe it's where he gets his income.
Por que no los dos?
IMO there must be some incentive, to get someone to go make a fool of themself trying to sell utterly transparent lies to complete strangers, for years on end.
You know, it's not unheard of for a heroin dealer to also use heroin.
 
You know, it's not unheard of for a heroin dealer to also use heroin.
Heh. I think they usually stop when they get caught.
But not always, I guess. 🙄
Do they though? My impression was that junkie dealers were mostly on the revolving door plan.
 
Back
Top Bottom