• Welcome to the Internet Infidels Discussion Board.

"Children cannot consent to puberty blockers" and being in the wrong body

I must have missed it. Where do we discover that Chris is transgender?
The same place where we knew, long before they were ever outed as having sex with men, that all the ex-gay counselors never stopped shagging dudes.

Methinks he doth protest too much.
None of us spend that time "anorgasmic".

In fact, "anorgasmic lifelong pharmaceutical patients" describes all the trans people I knew from before their transitions; you still sound quote "confused". After their transitions, they have practically "glowed". They also had no problems with sex. They all tend to HAVE plenty of sex, but they don't have any problems with it.
Ok that sounds good.
It absolutely does not sound like you EVER actually got professional help for your gender issues.

It sounds like they were groomed into self-hate.
I don't think I have self-hate at the moment. Other than hating my belly fat. And wishing I would be more capable of having a job.
All continuing to listen to this shyster will do is continue to make you more like him until you start to hate that part of yourself and distort in the same way. He is grooming you.
Well I've never really thought about being a woman. If I did have surgery it would be to get rid of my belly fat. I've never worn female clothing or wanted to.
You have to actually understand why you continue to hurt over it and what you really want and why you want it.
I don't think I continue to hurt over it. Except for belly fat.
Personally, I would recommend finding a therapist to talk with about gender issues because Chris is a cultist, and your issues of depression were almost certainly coming from a similar place as my own: Lifelong indoctrination into a church where any deviation of either interest of vigor in pursuing the "WASP" lifestyle was seen as, well, deviance.
I see psychologists, GPs and psychiatrists fairly regularly. I don't think I have gender issues.
I can't begin to describe the amount of depression I felt as a teen and young adult around that whole socio-sexual expectation issue.

Look at your language in your post. You weren't looking for "friends" or "companionship" or "a relationship", or "someone in your life" you were looking for a "girlfriend",
Well my love language is "physical touch" and those other options don't necessarily involve that.
a mystic gem or McGuffin someone near the beginning of a quest tells them they must one day find least you be "broken" forever.

It seems like you found something more healthy than what you were looking for, but the fact is that you still very much have all the trappings of someone who still has something "unresolved", an itch under the surface that has survived your relationship and is now looking to try to scratch the itch of your scars to make it go away.

It won't go away Excreo. It will continue "itching". It will continue being like this for you, with some uncomfortable feelings that Chris will do his damnedest to convince you to turn outward, but the person you are still uncomfortable with, if this keeps popping into your head, is you.
BTW I was planning castration about 20 years ago, in my 20s.
If you feel the need to look at trans issues more often than actual trans people, you are the confused, possibly curious, person in that equation.
I've never wanted to have my penis removed. Maybe I wanted catrastion so that I won't be addicted to porn or something (which was straight porn).
Then, it sounds like your reasons for wanting castration were entirely based on myth, misunderstanding, confusion, and desperation.

If education has been ubiquitous 20 years ago, you would have known this, and I would have known it WAS exactly what I wanted.

Either way, this is exacerbated in both respects by a lack of education.

I might also observe that those cultures you mentioned being involved with were also very masturbation-negative.

Also, completely unsure why you're bringing up penile removal. I think you have a very distorted view of how genital modification works. Nothing tends to get "removed"... And most people who say goodbye to their balls keep their penis, as far as I know.
 
Then, it sounds like your reasons for wanting castration were entirely based on myth, misunderstanding, confusion, and desperation.
Well I forgot about the plan within a couple of days. At that time I also did other questionable stuff like making my dog tread water in a shut wheelie bin and something involving my cat and I attempted suicide.
I might also observe that those cultures you mentioned being involved with were also very masturbation-negative.
There is a huge difference between masturbating to porn and masturbation on its own. Dr Glover calls it "healthy masturbation" where you just concentrate on the sensations rather than fantasies. Apparently "healthy masturbation" is nowhere as compulsive as porn addiction can be.
Also, completely unsure why you're bringing up penile removal. I think you have a very distorted view of how genital modification works. Nothing tends to get "removed"... And most people who say goodbye to their balls keep their penis, as far as I know.
I assumed that transitioning to be a woman would involve the removal of the penis. I guess what you're talking about is a "chick with a dick" (which I have in my Bible-based game). Well I said I never have wanted to wear women's clothing or have any interest in it. I thought if I was trans I would.
 
Last edited:
They also had no problems with sex. They all tend to HAVE plenty of sex, but they don't have any problems with it.
Well Chris says that Teddy Cook talks about “trans orgies”.
Is there anything wrong with trans orgies? Also, tell him to cue me in on where these are happening, I think I'm missing out!

I assumed that transitioning to be a woman would involve the removal of the penis.
As I said, nothing there tends to be removed. Stuff occasionally gets moved, if someone wants it to be, but only if they want.

Honestly, I would get a change myself, but the technology doesn't exist for that yet and society might collapse before we can invent it.

Well I forgot about the plan within a couple of days
Then you weren't really contemplating it then, were you.

You wanted to cut your balls off because you were afraid of your own inadequacy, I wanted to have my balls off because I genuinely hate how testosterone makes me feel most of the time.

But for some reason, you still seem to think about it, enough that Chris calls out to you, and trans issues call out to Chris, just like men's backsides seem to call out to famous ex-gay folks.

Anyway, call me when you find out about those orgies Chris seems so interested in.

That said, if you want to meet some folks into "competitive semi-private dildo-ing", I could probably hook you up, but only if you promise to not tell Chris, that fucker is ⬜.
 
They also had no problems with sex. They all tend to HAVE plenty of sex, but they don't have any problems with it.
Well Chris says that Teddy Cook talks about “trans orgies”.
Is there anything wrong with trans orgies?
Chris seems to be saying it is inappropriate to post about that for someone with their role involving children.
Well I forgot about the plan within a couple of days
Then you weren't really contemplating it then, were you.
Actually if I had seriously thought about it for another week there would be a high chance I could have castrated myself.
Elastic band castration cuts off blood supply to the testicles. A lack of blood supply kills the testicles. The equipment for banding calves less than three weeks of age is called an elastrator. An elastrator (Figure 1) is the tool used to apply an elastic band to the neck of the scrotum. The elastic band obstructs blood flow to the testicles and the scrotum. In time, the scrotum and testicles fall from the body.
You wanted to cut your balls off because you were afraid of your own inadequacy, I wanted to have my balls off because I genuinely hate how testosterone makes me feel most of the time.

But for some reason, you still seem to think about it, enough that Chris calls out to you, and trans issues call out to Chris, just like men's backsides seem to call out to famous ex-gay folks.
I don't think it has anything to do with being a different gender for me. Castration is more related to how some pedos are castrated or people want them to be castrated.
When Chris talks about pedos perhaps that calls out to me but nothing about trans people.
 
Chris seems to be saying it is inappropriate to post about that for someone with their role involving children
What the hell? Who the fuck is talking about orgies involving children?

Chris? That's fucked.

He has some major issues if he wants to have an orgy with children.

(I'm being facetious; two can play the game though).

Actually if I had seriously thought about it for another week there would be a high chance I could have castrated myself.
Yeah, and I pointed out that no self.rrspectonf shrink would have signed off on that.

It takes a year on medication after a year of counseling to even potentially be able to approach that in a normal medical setting, and for good reason.

Castration is more related to how some pedos...
And that's another misconception about castration, and I'm not even going to try picking this bit apart.
 
Actually if I had seriously thought about it for another week there would be a high chance I could have castrated myself.
Yeah, and I pointed out that no self.rrspectonf shrink would have signed off on that.
If I used elastic bands I could have done it myself without talking to any expert. I have never talked to an expert about that kind of thing. (it was buried down pretty deep)
Castration is more related to how some pedos...
And that's another misconception about castration, and I'm not even going to try picking this bit apart.
Ok. Anyway this talk of pedos is getting into my mind. I've got to try and think of something else. I think I'll stop going on about Chris (like him saying children are "beautiful" just as they are) BTW in "The Apprentice" movie, Trump's lawyer Roy Cohn would insult people by calling them faggots (while he was a huge one) and Chris sometimes talks about pedos as if he thinks they're bad. Though maybe the chances are that Chris isn't one. BTW in Robert Glover's No More Mr Nice Guy he said he has consistently found that the nicer the guy the darker their sexual secrets.
 
Last edited:
About the book "No More Mr Nice Guy":
The nice guy is afraid of conflict, so he avoids it at all costs by being nice.
Since he avoids conflicts, nothing ever gets solved with him. He might disagree, but he doesn’t say it or he might even pretend to agree, just to avoid conflict and arguments.
If you are thinking that sounds a lot like passive-aggressive, you got it right: the nice guy is the epitome of passive-aggressive.

When he disagrees, he still tells people what they want to hear. But, typical of the worst slimy people-pleasing behavior, he then reverses his words and decisions to please someone else.
So Chris doesn't fit this definition but I was talking about other people who do. Like my former flatmate who is being jailed multiple times for quite a few years for possessing a lot of child pornography. This is still related to Chris because Chris sometimes talks about a hypothetical situation of a child consenting to having sex with a man. My friend is interested in becoming a born again Christian.
 
I just don't understand the fascination with Chris. His starting point is children can't consent to puberty blockers.

Can a child with cancer consent to chemo?

Can a child with heart defects consent to open heart surgery?

Can a child with cleft lip consent to repair surgery?

Can conjoined twin children consent to separation surgery?

Can children consent to onoplasty (cosmetic ear surgery routinely performed on children under 7 years old)

Can children consent to vaccines

Can male children consent to breast reduction surgery (gynecomestia surgery).

Can children consent to ADHD medication?

There are so many common medical procedures and treatments done on children, some of them very invasive, that Chris doesn't seem to give a shit about. Would he ever wear a billboard about children being unable to consent to all of these? Why the singular obsession with puberty blockers? That will tell you everything you need to know about the ulterior motive these assholes have, all driven by a right wing culture war rather than some genuine concern for children and supposed improper medical care.

Do you object to any (all?) of these medical treatments on the same grounds as puberty blockers?
 
I just don't understand the fascination with Chris. His starting point is children can't consent to puberty blockers.
Well according to the High Court in the UK children can't consent to it while on the other hand people in the trans (gender ideology?) movement are strongly against this - sometimes being very abusive and even violent. But I sometimes find the drama fascinating.
Can a child with cancer consent to chemo?

Can a child with heart defects consent to open heart surgery?

Can a child with cleft lip consent to repair surgery?

Can conjoined twin children consent to separation surgery?

Can children consent to onoplasty (cosmetic ear surgery routinely performed on children under 7 years old)

Can children consent to vaccines

Can male children consent to breast reduction surgery (gynecomestia surgery).

Can children consent to ADHD medication?
But do those examples focus on what gender the child thinks they are?
"This study from Singh, Bradley, and Zucker on gender identity & sexual orientation of pre-pubertal boys showed that 87.8% of boys saw their gender dysphoria desist"
So the gender the child identifies as isn't necessarily objective and permanent (if puberty is allowed to continue) while in those other examples those problems are more objective.
There are so many common medical procedures and treatments, some of them very invasive, that Chris doesn't seem to give a shit about. Would he ever wear a billboard about children being unable to consent to all of these? Why the singular obsession with puberty blockers?
Part of the reason is that it can provoke a strong reaction.
That will tell you everything you need to know about the ulterior motive these assholes have, all driven by a right wing culture war rather than some genuine concern for children and medical care.
Well Chris often gives the impression that he has a "genuine concern for children and medical care".
 
I just don't understand the fascination with Chris. His starting point is children can't consent to puberty blockers.
Well according to the High Court in the UK children can't consent to it while on the other hand people in the trans (gender ideology?) movement are strongly against this - sometimes being very abusive and even violent. But I sometimes find the drama fascinating.
Can a child with cancer consent to chemo?

Can a child with heart defects consent to open heart surgery?

Can a child with cleft lip consent to repair surgery?

Can conjoined twin children consent to separation surgery?

Can children consent to onoplasty (cosmetic ear surgery routinely performed on children under 7 years old)

Can children consent to vaccines

Can male children consent to breast reduction surgery (gynecomestia surgery).

Can children consent to ADHD medication?
But do those examples focus on what gender the child thinks they are?
"This study from Singh, Bradley, and Zucker on gender identity & sexual orientation of pre-pubertal boys showed that 87.8% of boys saw their gender dysphoria desist"
So the gender the child identifies as isn't necessarily objective and permanent (if puberty is allowed to continue) while in those other examples those problems are more objective.
There are so many common medical procedures and treatments, some of them very invasive, that Chris doesn't seem to give a shit about. Would he ever wear a billboard about children being unable to consent to all of these? Why the singular obsession with puberty blockers?
Well according to the High Court in the UK children can't consent to it while on the other hand people in the trans (gender ideology?) movement are strongly against this - sometimes being very abusive and even violent. But I sometimes find that fascinating.
That will tell you everything you need to know about the ulterior motive these assholes have, all driven by a right wing culture war rather than some genuine concern for children and medical care.
Well Chris often gives the impression that he has a "genuine concern for children and medical care".
Demonstrably false. If he had genuine concern consistent with his claims his billboard would read "Children cannot consent to medial care." and argue from there.

He is a disingenuous lying piece of shit. Don't get sucked in by such amateurish tactics.
 
Well Chris often gives the impression that he has a "genuine concern for children and medical care".
Demonstrably false. If he had genuine concern consistent with his claims his billboard would read "Children cannot consent to medial care." and argue from there.

He is a disingenuous lying piece of shit. Don't get sucked in by such amateurish tactics.
Then why did the High Court make its decision? Does it involve concern for the children?
 
Well Chris often gives the impression that he has a "genuine concern for children and medical care".
Demonstrably false. If he had genuine concern consistent with his claims his billboard would read "Children cannot consent to medial care." and argue from there.

He is a disingenuous lying piece of shit. Don't get sucked in by such amateurish tactics.
Then why did the High Court make its decision? Does it involve concern for the children?
You tell me? What medical care did they determine that children can and cannot consent to? If the answer is they can't consent to any medical care, then you must either concede that children should never receive any medical care, or that consent isn't the only factor worth considering. Which is it?

Why don't you give me the list of medical treatment that you would allow for children and the list you wouldn't allow, and why? What is your specific criteria? If you have none, why don't you give me Chris' specific criteria? I thought Chris was the expert here so not sure why you deferred to a court decision.
 

Then why did the High Court make its decision? Does it involve concern for the children?
You tell me? What medical care did they determine that children can and cannot consent to?
It says:
On December 1st, 2020, the High Court in London ruled that children are unlikely to be able to give informed consent to undergo treatment with puberty-blocking drugs. All children under 16 years of age had to immediately come off of puberty blockers, and clinicians were instructed to seek court approval to treat children aged 16 and 17.
If the answer is they can't consent to any medical care, then you must either concede that children should never receive any medical care, or that consent isn't the only factor worth considering. Which is it?
I think in your other examples the child could have been unconscious and the diagnosis could still be made (unless it involves questions like "does it hurt when I do this?" - which a 3 year old could be capable of). This case centres around the testimony of the child which could possibly change (perhaps unlike in your other examples).
Why don't you give me the list of medical treatment that you would allow for children and the list you wouldn't allow, and why? What is your specific criteria? If you have none, why don't you give me Chris' specific criteria? I thought Chris was the expert here so not sure why you deferred to a court decision.
Well that link is from Chris's official website... his billboard seems to be based on what the High Court ruled. I think he is still an expert in "conversations" and debating, etc, but not officially a medical expert.
 
Last edited:
Here is a speech to a crowd from September 2023 that he published on YouTube 2 days ago. It goes for 40 minutes but so far I've only watched bits of it.

14:42
"these people are ghouls - this is evil - this is a cult that has permeated all of society" and says it goes into "tremendous child abuse" (1:48).

So it looks like Chris is hateful towards the medical experts responsible for the transitioning. The video title talks about the "madness" of child transition.

11:12 says it's not ok to object to "sterilising your own child" and "help her feel comfortable with her sex". "That's now called conversion therapy and you can go to jail for 5 years".

34:07 "speak about it with compassion, don't be bombastic, just tell the truth - this is child abuse, pure and simple - and there's no such thing as a transgender child". (which people here would disagree with, but I just wanted people to hear exactly what Chris is saying to his supporters)

His 40 minute speech seems to go into a lot of detail about this topic. There are also some other people speaking in the videos rather than Chris wanting you to take his word for all of this.
 
Last edited:
I found out something else about Chris:

"are you religious?"
"no, a lot of people assume this is about religion, but no, this is just about objective reality"
 
If I used elastic bands I could have done it myself without talking to any expert. I have never talked to an expert about that kind of thing. (it was buried down pretty deep)
This is literally self-abuse at that point. Doing things without oversight is the last resort of the desperate.

This is why proper channels exist in the first place.

I have spent 3 years trying to get this done through proper channels specifically so I wouldn't be seen the way you would if you had done that and I fully agree with the existence of the gate there.

The whole point of blockers (the thing this thread is arguing against) is that you can feel the effects of taking some move like that with minimal long term side effects in case it doesn't have the effects you were expecting.

It's abuse specifically to deprive you of those facts and channels. Consider that this ignorance and inability to access proper channels for that decision is specifically what led you to almost do it improperly.


Actually pay attention to the one person you will probably EVER meet who would tell someone that it's absolutely OK to get castrated when they tell you "but only if you go through the proper channels" when they say that you almost going through with that was a product of people like CHRIS who would have you kept ignorant and even delete the existence of the channels.

Seriously, what are we even debating here? Pretty much anyone who accuses adults of grooming children when it is children making decisions for themselves hopefully with MINIMAL adult control, and us trying to make sure they have the best information to make the best decisions.

Calling something like letting a child research something for themselves, and come to their own conclusions using true and unbiased information "abuse" is "bombastic".

More and more it's obvious that Chris's schtick is that he says the most hateful bullshit juxtaposed with the use of calm tone so that when someone reacts, people pay attention to the tone rather than content.

The entire trans care infrastructure is specifically set up to discourage casual interest, prevent long term decisions until deliberation has been done, and to filter dangerous and inaccurate information that rushes people towards decisions.

That infrastructure was put into place because kids were killing or injuring themselves in secret and in private because they lacked information that would tell them that they were normal, their weird, inexplicable desires for their body were actually not so weird and not so inexplicable, and that they have pathways towards what they want without self harm.

One thing that eunuchs face a hm very difficult challenge in is that even today, it's really hard to get validating trans care as a eunuch.

If I wanted it in the 90's or even 00's I was aware I would have to fake being trans-femme to get blockers and surgical intervention, and even then it would have been really hard convincing anyone to get a prescription.

Does that really sound like a world where ANYONE is "rushed" into a situation like that?

As it is, people fighting as young adults to get fertility-ending procedures fight against a stiff wind of natalism shot deep through the medical establishment. You know how hard it is for an 18 year old woman to get her tubes tied?

It's damn near impossible. Nobody will fucking do it.

I had a coworker whose completely non-functional ovaries were literally fucking killing her and she couldn't find a doctor to take them out for YEARS because of that bullshit. She almost died because of other people's unearned and frankly inappropriate interest in her non-functional gonads.

It's unbelievable the bias in that regard.

Chris will ultimately cause more kids to castrate themselves and regret it.

And never have I once encountered any person, trans or therapist, who recommends hormones and transition without also recommending doing their best to be at peace with who they are without it.
 
Chris will ultimately cause more kids to castrate themselves and regret it.
As far as I know he's not indoctrinating children (but he says the trans supporters are in schools) - except for his own. He says that children are beautiful as they are. I'd don't see how that would provoke children to castrate themselves.
 
Back
Top Bottom