• Welcome to the Internet Infidels Discussion Board.

We are on the Verge of Economic Catastrophe

The economic stupidity of this administration is like just putting a gun to our long term economic head.


Trump’s immigration policies are likely to cause a huge brain drain and red states following suit with restrictive laws about their foreign students. This is just beyond stupid. Higher education is one of our brightest spots, resulting in a huge brain influx into the United States as many stay afterwards contributing significantly to our economic growth over the last few decades to say the least. We have a large trade surplus in terms of higher education. But they’re intent on killing it with incredibly stupid laws. Is the Republican Party just full of complete dumbasses? Don’t answer that.
 
(This thread is in "U.S. Presidential, but I've been posting about financial events and trends. Should I ask Mods to split these posts off?)

I'll guess that most here will agree with me if I suggest that the U.S. financial industry is VERY corrupt. For example, during the 2010's JPMorgan engaged in fraudulent activity in precious metal markets. One crime they committed was "spoofing" -- creating orders for stocks, metals or derivatives that they hope will NOT execute, but which may cause other traders to misjudge sentiment. The two top precious metal traders at JPMorgan were convicted of felonies and sentenced to prison. The bank itself paid a fine higher than $100 million, probably less than the profits gained from the crimes.

The recent collapse in silver prices is probably another example. Many small or largish players were very LONG (bullish) in silver, buying future contracts on margin. Banks, led by JPMorgan, sold those future contracts; they were SHORT (bearish). The banks were promising to deliver silver on demand at some future date -- Silver they did not have. If you or I traded futures on COMEX and became "under water" we'd be liquidated, but the big banks have huge capital. Unlimited capital really since they're "too big to fail" -- The generosity of American taxpayers* will come through to support Wall St. if/when it goes "belly up." (* - Or is it the gullibility of U.S. bond buyers we need, with tax-paying becoming obsolescent in our Brave New World?)

I got side-tracked. 8-) What happened a few days ago was that COMEX suddenly and radically changed the margin requirements for those long silver, forcing them to sell at any price. Some White House fartings were the catalyst for the timing, but it was a conspiracy between CME/COMEX and the big banks that were the real cause.

Silver is unique because it has unusually inelastic supply AND (due to its rising use in high-tech electricals) inelastic demand. The price of silver has long been very volatile. In 1980, the silver price suddenly collapsed for the same reason-- COMEX suddenly changed its rules. At the time this was hyped as a good thing! Two billionaires (the Hunt brothers) were bankrupted. But COMEX was "unfair" to change rules in the middle of the game, and small-time silver buyers also got hurt.

Silver has clawed its way back to almost $87 after its crash to $71 but as proof that the markets for "paper silver" in New York and London are shams, if you actually want PHYSICAL silver in Shanghai you may need to pay $121 (the recent top price for paper silver) or more. Physical silver in New York or London is almost UNAVAILABLE at any price.

- - - - - - - - -

Just now I saw a headline: "Any sign that the Treasury might significantly increase the sizes of its future note and bond auctions could rattle traders." Treasury sells debt paper with maturities ranging from 4 weeks to 30 years. "Note and bond" means long-term debt as opposed to bills (short term paper). Long-term paper is a bet on the Future of the Dollar, while owning Bills is almost the same as owning FedRes "Benjamins." Normally when deficits are high, the Treasury will issue more longer-term paper. It's no secret that deficits are rising; why then would it "rattle traders" if the Treasury does what what was routine in the past?

The answer is simple: The Emperor has no clothes. The Dollar's future is in doubt. When bond auctions fail, the Emperor's nudity is exposed. UST, FedRes, obligated banks, and even the central banks of obligated countries are already buying long-term debt they don't really want.

I asked ChatGPT for some numbers; here a few:
Ratio of marketable debt with maturities of 20 Years or more to Total Outstanding Marketable Treasury Debt
2000≈ 15%Smaller long-bond program after 1990s surpluses; issuance curtailed
2005≈ 9%Treasury had suspended 30-year issuance (2001–2006)
2010≈ 13%30-year bond reintroduced in 2006; share rebuilding
2015≈ 16%Post-GFC maturity extension strategy
2020≈ 18%Pandemic borrowing; Treasury leaned into duration
2023≈ 16.5%Bills expanded faster than bonds
2024≈ 16–17%Essentially flat vs 2023

Treasure has been replacing Bonds with Bills to keep the percent near 17%.
I copy/pasted the above numbers from ChatGPT.
I think it may amuse the reader to report what I had to do to get the numbers:

ChatGPT said:
Swammi: [asked for details about U.S. debt]

Chat: ...
You can download this and aggregate by year and maturity bucket
...
[Chat asked if I wanted detailed discussion of how to download data and run Excel]

Swammi: You repeat "You can download this and aggregate by year and maturity bucket." I thought this was the sort of task that YOU were good at!

Chat: Fair rebuke taken. You are right. This is exactly the sort of bean-counting I should do for you, not gesture toward like a librarian pointing vaguely at a dusty shelf. Let’s put numbers on the table.
And then it DID give me the numbers I'd asked for!
 

He knows the Titanic sank, Right?
When Biden was POTUS the US Titanic was on a course to avoid the iceberg. When Trump became POTUS again he then steered the US in such a way that it would take maximum damage from the iceberg.:tombstone::realitycheck:
 
What?! You can turnaround the Titanic overnight. It is actually exceptionally easy to do. Turning it off-course to avoid an iceberg within a minute or two was the hard part.
 
Economy underperformed on jobs, even with the paltry expectations of 45,000, only made around 22,000.

Trump turned the economy straight toward icebergs and the GOP remained silent. 2026 could be the worst wave since 2010 if the US slips into a recession. It is no wonder, Trump wants to oversee the elections.
 
Trump Homes.

I am sure this is a scam. No way tRump would do it if it was not good for him.
The rent to own thing sounds fishy.
 
What?! You can turnaround the Titanic overnight. It is actually exceptionally easy to do. Turning it off-course to avoid an iceberg within a minute or two was the hard part.
The RMS Titanic had a turning circle of about 1.3km, at 21 knots; It would take about one minute to turn around 180°, or two minutes to turn a full 360.

That's pretty poor performance by comparison to other large ships of her time; She was a liner, not a warship, so sharp course corrections were not part of her design philosophy, and her rudder was rather small for a vessel of her length.

But overnight? No drama at all.
 
Evans-Pritchard (of The Telegraph) wrote, "The way to hold Trump’s feet to the fire is for the whole world – Europe, China, Japan, Brazil, central banks, sovereign wealth funds, pension funds, insurance companies and banks – to sit out the next auction by the US treasury and see how easy it is for US domestic capital markets to cover debt sales running at $2.5tn a month."

"Impossible to coordinate? Yes, of course. But it is time to start floating such ideas in public. The only language Trump understands is money, so let us cut off his global credit card."


The economic push against Trump may be necessary, Evans-Pritchard says, because much of the world is unprepared for the world politics impact Trump's taking of Greenland would cause.


The international business editor continued, "China can take care of itself and profit from this unfolding disgrace. It has the weaponized deterrent of critical minerals.

"Trump’s capitulation has been total: China has won access to advanced H200 Invidia chips needed for artificial intelligence, and won a green light to take Taiwan – 'it’s up to Xi', said Trump. Europe and much of the world are not so well prepared. They are close to defenseless."

There was also a warning from Evans-Pritchard over what Trump may target next. The president moved rapidly on Venezuela, has backed ICE agents in Minneapolis, and has now turned his attention to Greenland.
 
Well, the jobs report shows a decline of 92,000 when the expected value was +58,000. Oil prices, thanks to fucktards war, have jumped about $25/barrel just in a few days. That always bodes well for the economy, I can assure you - or at least Exxon's stock price and Trump enterprises.

But never let this shit bother you. For a trumpian view of these headline numbers:


"[T]he February jobs report does not signal weakness. Instead, it reflects a labor market settling into a more sustainable pattern—one characterized by rising wages, stronger productivity, and steady employment."

I guess we will know sometime by May-ish.
 
*shoulder shrug*

Clearly the GOP doesn't care anymore. We are about 10k or 20k net jobs created in the last 8 months. Not per month, total. And we are wasting munitions to take out small rocket platforms.
 
Breaking records


They’ve now dropped over $10. Not sure why.

It is a market thing. Oil is trending way up at the moment regardless if it settles a little from the jumps. With the choke point on the Hormuz, I'm imagining a lot of math being done regarding existing oil out in the system, alternative methods of redistributing oil in areas of conflict, and who will be impacted when. This can also just stop if Israel/USA end and try to negotiate. That doesn't seem likely, but Iran giving up also seems unlikely. We know Iran can be quite stubborn and pressure against Trump is going to grow quickly, domestically and abroad. It is always hard to determine how Trump will take information. But this can end quickly. They trashed Iran's military and nuclear weapon program (?) again. Israel and USA can walk away with a "moral" victory.

If not, then it comes down to if anyone is willing to risk Hormuz. Those that have at this point have failed. A couple more failures would be costly in the markets.
 
  • Like
Reactions: SLD
Back
Top Bottom