• Welcome to the Internet Infidels Discussion Board.

Well... it's Trump... again. #47, here we go.

The fascist Bag of Dog Shit Bondi tried to charge the democratic lawmakers who produced a video urging the military not to obey illegal orders. An outragious fascist action. Grand Jury says Fuck YOU to Bondi.


A more in depth story fron NYT Shared
 
Trump: "Construction jobs are way up, right? Well, they're up because they're building all these factories all over the country. You have car plants under construction. I spoke to Mr. Toyota in Japan. I said, 'What's you name?' 'Toy-ota!' I said, 'If your name is Toyota you're a very rich guy.'"

Two minutes! You couldn’t spent two minutes on Google, could you Dickhead?

Trump - “Well why’d they hire a guy name Toyoda to run a company named Toyota? That’s just confusing.”

Nevermind.
 
The CEO of Toyota Japan is Akio Toyoda, not Toyota, so Trump is wrong again. Any real POTUS would have gained prior knowledge of the actual name of who he was going to meet.
I'd cut him a break on this one. If he called him Akio Hyundai you'd have a point.
Agreed, the issue with his statement is that the conversation, as noted, likely never happened.
 
Who is Sasha Riley and why is alleged Epstein survivor's testimony audio going viral?

Audio recordings and testimony attributed to Sasha Riley (also spelled Sascha Riley) have been circulating widely on social media platforms such as Threads and Substack, prompting intense online discussion. The material contains serious allegations connected to the Jeffrey Epstein scandal and names several high-profile political figures. Importantly, these claims are being shared online and are not confirmed by courts or mainstream news outlets.

Below is a simple breakdown of what is being claimed, who is involved, and why the content is going viral, strictly based on the information provided.

What Do the Viral Audio Recordings Claim?​

The viral content includes six unedited audio recordings, which the publisher says remain in her custody, with copies allegedly shared with police and “trusted allies” in several countries.

The testimony describes:

  • Alleged trafficking of impoverished children under 13
  • Claims of rape, torture, and murder
  • Allegations of forced participation in child pornography films
  • Claims that a child was shot and killed during a “snuff film”
  • Assertions that these acts occurred within the Trump/Epstein network
The publisher states these accounts were released “in the public interest” and that investigations are ongoing.

Alleged Links to Public Figures​

According to the testimony summary, Riley claims he is willing to testify against several well-known individuals, including President Donald Trump, Ohio Congressman Jim Jordan, Arizona Congressman Andy Biggs, South Carolina Senator Lindsey Graham, and Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas.
 
I think marble is beautiful but it seems unwise to use it on a floor with lots of people in dress shoes.

On the walls, it looks like they used cheap garden lattice from a garden center.
I would prefer marble on the walls, and something quartz based for the floors.

But then, I don't normally like marble in interior architecture, so what I would prefer here is relative.
 
I think marble is beautiful but it seems unwise to use it on a floor with lots of people in dress shoes.

On the walls, it looks like they used cheap garden lattice from a garden center.
I would prefer marble on the walls, and something quartz based for the floors.

But then, I don't normally like marble in interior architecture, so what I would prefer here is relative.
Still reminds me of Versailles. (never been there but would love to go)
 
I'm feeling fatigue about how the "Republicans are starting to stand up to Trump" when we are talking one to six people. Curious if this gets a vote in the Senate.
 
I think marble is beautiful but it seems unwise to use it on a floor with lots of people in dress shoes.

On the walls, it looks like they used cheap garden lattice from a garden center.
I would prefer marble on the walls, and something quartz based for the floors.

But then, I don't normally like marble in interior architecture, so what I would prefer here is relative.
Still reminds me of Versailles. (never been there but would love to go)
I think that is the reference you were supposed to call up.
 
The CEO of Toyota Japan is Akio Toyoda, not Toyota, so Trump is wrong again. Any real POTUS would have gained prior knowledge of the actual name of who he was going to meet.
I'd cut him a break on this one.
Riiiight. After all, why should anyone, let alone the POTUS, know who they are speaking to?
 

The cost is set to go even higher this year to $1,300 per household, assuming the existing tariffs stay in place, the research said.

The research called Trump's tariffs "the largest U.S. tax increase as a percent of GDP since 1993." It suggests the president's signature economic policy is exacerbating cost of living concerns at a time when many households are grappling with persistently high prices.

According to the research think tank Tax Foundation, the federal government collected $264 billion in total tariff revenues in 2025 -- far short of the trillions regularly touted by the White House. The research also finds the tariffs will offset most of the economic benefits of the new tax cuts from Trump's signature tax law that took effect this year.
 

The cost is set to go even higher this year to $1,300 per household, assuming the existing tariffs stay in place, the research said.

The research called Trump's tariffs "the largest U.S. tax increase as a percent of GDP since 1993." It suggests the president's signature economic policy is exacerbating cost of living concerns at a time when many households are grappling with persistently high prices.

According to the research think tank Tax Foundation, the federal government collected $264 billion in total tariff revenues in 2025 -- far short of the trillions regularly touted by the White House. The research also finds the tariffs will offset most of the economic benefits of the new tax cuts from Trump's signature tax law that took effect this year.

Meanwhile the Federal Reserve of New York and Colombia University report what everyone with a brain already knew. US companies and citizens are paying 90% of the tariffs.

President Trump has frequently claimed that foreign countries were paying for his tariffs, not Americans. But as economists predicted, that is largely turning out not to be the case.

Research published on Thursday by economists at the Federal Reserve Bank of New York and Columbia University suggests that, through November 2025, 90 percent of the economic burden of the president’s tariffs fell on U.S. companies and consumers.

 

The cost is set to go even higher this year to $1,300 per household, assuming the existing tariffs stay in place, the research said.

The research called Trump's tariffs "the largest U.S. tax increase as a percent of GDP since 1993." It suggests the president's signature economic policy is exacerbating cost of living concerns at a time when many households are grappling with persistently high prices.

According to the research think tank Tax Foundation, the federal government collected $264 billion in total tariff revenues in 2025 -- far short of the trillions regularly touted by the White House. The research also finds the tariffs will offset most of the economic benefits of the new tax cuts from Trump's signature tax law that took effect this year.

Meanwhile the Federal Reserve of New York and Colombia University report what everyone with a brain already knew. US companies and citizens are paying 90% of the tariffs.
Why only 90%? Who is paying the other 10%?
 
Back
Top Bottom