Which bits of "available information" suggests this kid was from an "anti-white, anti-cop culture?"
I'm wondering the same thing of this UVA student.
Which bits of "available information" suggests this kid was from an "anti-white, anti-cop culture?"
I see. And I'm guessing they made the Michael Brown expy an innocent victim and the Darren Wilson expy a clan member who is a love child of George Wallace and Strom Thurmond?Basically, the main character prevented another Ferguson from occurring in DC, and took the parents of the dead kid to the White House. I don't watch, but my Twitter Timeline explodes every time is comes on.
Two things: his race and his beatdown.Which bits of "available information" suggests this kid was from an "anti-white, anti-cop culture?"
I'm wondering the same thing of this UVA student.
did anyone else notice that his ID was not fake??? half the posts on this thread can be ignored... The ID had his correct birthday (indicating he was only 20 years old), and he WAS NOT DRINKING, as a breathalyzer indicated.
It was a "bad stop", but we have no idea how the situation escalated. Either the person trained to deal with these situation completely fucked up or the person who comes from an anti-white, anti-cop culture escalated... no way to tell unless you were there. I've made my assumptions on the available information (that I read, unlike 50% of the posters in this thread).
Which bits of "available information" suggests this kid was from an "anti-white, anti-cop culture?"
How about people in white robes and white hoods?Which bits of "available information" suggests this kid was from an "anti-white, anti-cop culture?"
The kids manner in the video that was taken after the incident... the color of his skin (being honest - that is prejustice.. the same kind of prejustice you might use against people in ski masks that knock on your door at 3:00 AM), the clothes he was wearing, and the language that he used and manner he expressed himself.
Which bits of "available information" suggests this kid was from an "anti-white, anti-cop culture?"
The kids manner in the video that was taken after the incident... the color of his skin (being honest - that is prejustice.. the same kind of prejustice you might use against people in ski masks that knock on your door at 3:00 AM), the clothes he was wearing, and the language that he used and manner he expressed himself.
people of the culture he was acting in accordance to are anti "the man" (defined as all white people with any authority).
the color of his skin (being honest - that is prejustice.. the same kind of prejustice you might use against people in ski masks that knock on your door at 3:00 AM.
The clothes he was wearing?! On the night of the arrest he was wearing a pink henley shirt and what I'm pretty sure is an American Apparel hoodie. He had on some sort of slim-fit jeans or slacks, can't really tell, and brown shoes.
the color of his skin (being honest - that is prejustice.. the same kind of prejustice you might use against people in ski masks that knock on your door at 3:00 AM.
Wow... you actually typed that and then hit 'enter'...
So a black person is the same threat/alarm as a masked stranger knocking at your door at 3:00 a.m.
Just wow
Which bits of "available information" suggests this kid was from an "anti-white, anti-cop culture?"
The kids manner in the video that was taken after the incident...
And that somehow justifies a beatdown?Wow... you actually typed that and then hit 'enter'...
So a black person is the same threat/alarm as a masked stranger knocking at your door at 3:00 a.m.
Just wow
Sure, if you want to cherry pick the racist part out of the list of attributes that contribute to suspicion.
Prejudice comes from somewhere... personal experience is difficult to ignore.
a person appearing a certain way, acting a certain way, and speaking a certain way all together contribute to a picture of trust that is entirely based on past experiences.
Where is the evidence of a beat down? The video showed cops with calmly wrestling a resisting suspect and trying to cuff him. If scrapes and blood is proof of a "beat down"you would have to concede Zimmerman was beat down.
Interestingly, the same people who claim Zimmerman was beat down deny that this fellow was beat down.Where is the evidence of a beat down? The video showed cops with calmly wrestling a resisting suspect and trying to cuff him. If scrapes and blood is proof of a "beat down"you would have to concede Zimmerman was beat down.
Logic fail: a beatdown is a beatdown regardless of the perceived justification of the perpetrator.Where is the evidence of a beat down? The video showed cops with calmly wrestling a resisting suspect and trying to cuff him. If scrapes and blood is proof of a "beat down"you would have to concede Zimmerman was beat down.
He's black, therefore the police must have been in the wrong. Thus it must have been a beatdown.
Yes but the posters here that still defend Zimmerman departed from reasonableness long ago. Don't be like them in the opposite direction. I often criticize police but I can't bring myself to do it here simply because the video I saw was of cops with professional composure trying to subdue a resisting suspect. It just doesn't seem likely that they would have been unjustifiably beating him before the video starts then transition to reasonable police tactics.Interestingly, the same people who claim Zimmerman was beat down deny that this fellow was beat down.
Interestingly, the same people who claim Zimmerman was beat down deny that this fellow was beat down.
Then how was Zimmerman in danger of his life?Interestingly, the same people who claim Zimmerman was beat down deny that this fellow was beat down.
And who are those people? I can't think of anyone.
Martin attempted to administer a beatdown to Zimmerman. It was cut short by a gun.
Then how was Zimmerman in danger of his life?And who are those people? I can't think of anyone.
Martin attempted to administer a beatdown to Zimmerman. It was cut short by a gun.
Then how was Zimmerman in danger of his life?
You're not required to let the other guy actually inflict serious harm before you defend yourself.
You're not required to let the other guy actually inflict serious harm before you defend yourself.
Unless, of course, you're a hoodie wearing, skittle carrying, black teenager.