• Welcome to the Internet Infidels Discussion Board.

Do we have any Trump supporters here?

Oh, I forgot one. About a block away, there is a home that still has a Cruz sign in the front yard. Die hards!

Well, they're going to need them again in 2020. No point in taking them down if you're just going to have to put them back up again in four years. That guy is just efficient.
 

I did not say he was good for the country. I also said in the post you are referencing that I don't intend to support him.

I didn't say you were voting for him, I said Rvonse was. I didn't misrepresent you.

I don't intend to support Trump, but I do really like the effect he's having on everyone. He is a disruption, and our political process needs a major disruption. I do like Sanders, and he is also a disruption, just not quite as big a disruption.

Unless you can can explain the difference between "he's good for the country" and "I do really like the effect he's having on everyone."
 
Jason Harvestdancer said:
I do really like the effect he's having on everyone
Unless you can can explain the difference between "he's good for the country" and "I do really like the effect he's having on everyone."

Heh. Sounds almost like the Rump, eh? Quoting him verbatim is the same thing as misrepresenting him.
 
I did not say he was good for the country. I also said in the post you are referencing that I don't intend to support him.
Don't intend I see. Nice passive word there, very Libertarian.

Lame. Just what one might expect from a Trump supporter trying desperately to find allies.

I did not say he was good for the country. I also said in the post you are referencing that I don't intend to support him.

I didn't say you were voting for him, I said Rvonse was. I didn't misrepresent you.

I don't intend to support Trump, but I do really like the effect he's having on everyone. He is a disruption, and our political process needs a major disruption. I do like Sanders, and he is also a disruption, just not quite as big a disruption.

Unless you can can explain the difference between "he's good for the country" and "I do really like the effect he's having on everyone."

Yes. Those who deserve to have a bad time are having a bad time, and I'm enjoying the show. Did I say he's good for the country? Or that I'm enjoying the effect he's having on some people who really deserve it?

Unless you can can explain the difference between "he's good for the country" and "I do really like the effect he's having on everyone."

Heh. Sounds almost like the Rump, eh? Quoting him verbatim is the same thing as misrepresenting him.

Please quote me verbatim where I said he's good for the country. Oh, sorry, you can't. You really can't.

Hm, almost sound like the Rump, eh? Ascribing quotes to people that aren't true.
 
Yes. Those who deserve to have a bad time are having a bad time, and I'm enjoying the show.
I didn't realize libertarians and Libertarians were masochists.

Maybe he's referring to the Donald, or his campaign. Had to laugh, hearing a CNN talking head say "it looks like it has entered the hospice phase; he knows the End is Near, and now just wants to be surrounded by friends and family". Yesterday he was described as "sullen and erratic" in private. It's easy to see how he might be having a bad time.
 
Yes. Those who deserve to have a bad time are having a bad time, and I'm enjoying the show.
I didn't realize libertarians and Libertarians were masochists.

It is hardly masochism to enjoy the pain of another. Schadenfreude at best and sadism at worst.

Seeing what he's done to the Republicans, the Democrats, and the Media has been an entertaining show.
 
It is hardly masochism to enjoy the pain of another. Schadenfreude at best and sadism at worst.
Whoosh - it went right by you.

Your ... I'll generously call it an "attempt at humor" ... was understood. It was rejected because humor needs to have a basis in reality, something that constantly evades your grasp.
 
I don't see anything appealing about voting for Hilary Clinton. I am sure her supporters do.

The appeal of not having a psychotic narcissistic egomaniac in the white house would be one thing. In this case it's a matter of degrees.
Are you supporting Trump? If so, which one - the Trump who is "true to myself" or the one that reads from the teleprompter whatever Kellyanne tells him to? Can you split your vote between the two?
 
Don't intend I see. Nice passive word there, very Libertarian.

Lame. Just what one might expect from a Trump supporter trying desperately to find allies.

LOL. Jason said the same thing to me in the neg he gave me over this.

I did not say he was good for the country. I also said in the post you are referencing that I don't intend to support him.

I didn't say you were voting for him, I said Rvonse was. I didn't misrepresent you.

I don't intend to support Trump, but I do really like the effect he's having on everyone. He is a disruption, and our political process needs a major disruption. I do like Sanders, and he is also a disruption, just not quite as big a disruption.

Unless you can can explain the difference between "he's good for the country" and "I do really like the effect he's having on everyone."

Yes. Those who deserve to have a bad time are having a bad time, and I'm enjoying the show. Did I say he's good for the country? Or that I'm enjoying the effect he's having on some people who really deserve it?

So, your position is that when people get what you think they deserve, it is not a good thing for the country? Do you even believe or understand what you say?

Unless you can can explain the difference between "he's good for the country" and "I do really like the effect he's having on everyone."

Heh. Sounds almost like the Rump, eh? Quoting him verbatim is the same thing as misrepresenting him.

Please quote me verbatim where I said he's good for the country. Oh, sorry, you can't. You really can't.

Hm, almost sound like the Rump, eh? Ascribing quotes to people that aren't true.

In the very same quote, you also said, "He is a disruption, and our political process needs a major disruption."

I can't wait for your next incoherent response to explain how stating you believe the political process is undergoing something that it needs is not then also something you believe is good for the country.
 
Your ... I'll generously call it an "attempt at humor" ... was understood. It was rejected because humor needs to have a basis in reality, something that constantly evades your grasp.
No reason for you to belabor that you don't get it.

Oh, I get that your post was a joke ... just not the joke you intended.
 
Oh, I get that your post was a joke ... just not the joke you intended.
There is ample evidence to support the conclusion you have no way of knowing.

There is probably way more evidence that your post was not the joke you intended than either of us, or both of us working together, could ever compile in our lifetimes. Yes, that is right.
 
Back
Top Bottom