• Welcome to the new Internet Infidels Discussion Board, formerly Talk Freethought.

Syed's Mega-Thread

what i said was atheist believe in general
 
Actually, none of those are part of atheism. Atheism means that if you ask them if a given god exists, they will say no.

.
if i say god created life how would you refute that?
 
What is marriage? It's only the official recognition by the state of a commitment made between two people to join their lives together. People made that commitment long before there was any state to approve it,

so do you believe in marriage or not?

I don't give a shit either way. If people want to get married, that's up to them and it doesn't affect me one way or the other. Likewise if they just want to fuck. Their choice.
 
Is asking stupid questions a hobby or a vocation?

- - - Updated - - -

what i said was atheist believe in general

No, it wasn't. It was what you believe atheists believe. But atheists aren't robots programmed with the same beliefs as each other.
 
Actually, none of those are part of atheism. Atheism means that if you ask them if a given god exists, they will say no.

.
if i say god created life how would you refute that?

I would point out life giving rise to life all over the place without any evident help from any god. Then I would point out the complete and utter lack of any evidence for such a thing as a god. Then I would ask you to provide some evidence to back up your claim, as the burden of proof lies on you as the one making the positive claim. Then, when you'd blustered and preached for a while without providing any evidence except your usual bullshit, which is no evidence for anything, I'd walk away and leave you with your delusion.

Or maybe I'd just cut out the first few steps and walk away right at the start, knowing what to expect if I hung around. Saves time.
 
Actually, none of those are part of atheism. Atheism means that if you ask them if a given god exists, they will say no.

.
if i say god created life how would you refute that?

If I said that life was created by a magic unicorn who farts life out of his ass, how would you refute that?

If you said that you wouldn't because it's not an assertion backed up by any evidence and therefore you're fine simply rejecting it as baseless until such evidence is presented and didn't bother to refute it, I'd say that you have taken a valid position on my claim.

Show me a god creating life and I'll be glad to look at the evidence and offer up refutations of any particular points you give. I'm not going to do more until you stop dodging and start proving that life didn't come from the ass of a magic unicorn.
 
I would point out life giving rise to life all over the place without any evident help from any god. .

you gave no evidence for rise of life without god therefore goddidit

I'm rubber, you're glue. What you say bounces off me and sticks to you.

Shit, I promised myself I wouldn't sink to your level ...

Anyway ... Life makes life all over the place, whatever creatures you look at. And not a god to be seen. Now, about that evidence for your god ... got any yet?
 
I would point out life giving rise to life all over the place without any evident help from any god. .

you gave no evidence for rise of life without god therefore goddidit

This is just one of the many ways in which you thumb your nose at logic.

 False dilemma. Learn something about logic for baby Jesus's sake. It's almost his birthday after all.
 
you gave no evidence for rise of life without god therefore goddidit

This is just one of the many ways in which you thumb your nose at logic.

 False dilemma. Learn something about logic for baby Jesus's sake. It's almost his birthday after all.

I am opposed to trying to get the "No explanation, then Goddidit" crowd to use logic. IME it only causes them to wallow deeper in the irrational muck in which they are already mired.
 
you denied god based on philosophical and lifestyle reasons NOT based on science
Ooooooh! That's SO original. NO one ever tried to say I chose atheism in order to live a life of sin. And the rest of your post is just as much bullshit as this is.

You still don't know enough about atheism to define it TO atheists.
 
you denied god based on philosophical and lifestyle reasons NOT based on science
Ooooooh! That's SO original. NO one ever tried to say I chose atheism in order to live a life of sin. And the rest of your post is just as much bullshit as this is.

You still don't know enough about atheism to define it TO atheists.


Aw, c'mon Keith. Poor Syed is trying so earnestly to justify his superstitions to himself.... who are we to interfere? Being used as a pawn in his rationalization game is not so painful as undergoing the cognitive dissonance that comes with swallowing superstitious religious BS. Have some empathy dude! (Jesus WANTS you to! :D )
 
good as place as any to start:
if you need context just think components of nature
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Joan_Oró#Origins_of_life
One of his most important contributions was the prebiotic synthesis of the nucleobase adenine (a key component of nucleic acids) from hydrogen cyanide (HCN). He also showed that amino acids can be made from HCN plus ammonia in an aqueous solution.[1] This was achieved during the period 1959–1962 and stands, together with the Miller-Urey experiment, as one of the fundamental results of prebiotic chemistry. It opened up a research area eventually leading to the complete synthesis of other components of nucleic acids.
 
Life makes life all over the place, whatever creatures you look at. And not a god to be seen.


once life didn't existed on earth so how did life appeared without life? earth is magic land create life itself ?


Magic? You mean like some mysterious incorporeal being poofing everything into existence? Don't make me laugh.
 
Back
Top Bottom