Hannity-linked real estate form fraudulently foreclosed homes for profit

[Underseer]

https://amp.theguardian.com/media/2...property-dealer-jeff-brock-fraud-foreclosures

That's ok, though. None of those who lost their homes were from the economic elite, so they deserved to lose their homes. If they didn't want to be ripped off, they would have decided to be rich.

 

[untermensche]

Hannity is a partisan supporter of the oligarchy.

This is the stuff the oligarchy does.

As big a traitor to the ideal of democracy as could exist.

 

[Axulus]

Yes, those poor downtrodden banks that got ripped off from this activity. We must protect the banks from the oligarichy!

 

[Trausti]

Yes, those poor downtrodden banks that got ripped off from this activity. We must protect the banks from the oligarichy!

Damn, dude, it's like you actually read the article.

 

[Loren Pechtel]

https://amp.theguardian.com/media/2...property-dealer-jeff-brock-fraud-foreclosures

That's ok, though. None of those who lost their homes were from the economic elite, so they deserved to lose their homes. If they didn't want to be ripped off, they would have decided to be rich.

Try actually reading the article.

The foreclosures were not fraudulent!

What he was doing was rigging the bidding. The people legitimately lost their homes, but Georgia is a recourse state which means his actions lead to greater debt for the people than otherwise would have happened.

 

[LordKiran]

https://amp.theguardian.com/media/2...property-dealer-jeff-brock-fraud-foreclosures

That's ok, though. None of those who lost their homes were from the economic elite, so they deserved to lose their homes. If they didn't want to be ripped off, they would have decided to be rich.

Try actually reading the article.

The foreclosures were not fraudulent!

What he was doing was rigging the bidding. The people legitimately lost their homes, but Georgia is a recourse state which means his actions lead to greater debt for the people than otherwise would have happened.

And that's acceptable behavior where you're from?

 

[Trausti]

https://amp.theguardian.com/media/2...property-dealer-jeff-brock-fraud-foreclosures

That's ok, though. None of those who lost their homes were from the economic elite, so they deserved to lose their homes. If they didn't want to be ripped off, they would have decided to be rich.

Try actually reading the article.

The foreclosures were not fraudulent!

What he was doing was rigging the bidding. The people legitimately lost their homes, but Georgia is a recourse state which means his actions lead to greater debt for the people than otherwise would have happened.

And that's acceptable behavior where you're from?

Hannity wasn't the one doing the fraud. The houses were in foreclosure and the banks conducted an auction. (Happens all the time.) Someone unrelated to Hannity's company schemed with others to keep the auction prices low. That someone then sold the houses to Hannity's outfit at a stark markup. If you're intent is to smear someone you don't like with fraudulent activity, at least get your facts straight.

 

[Axulus]

https://amp.theguardian.com/media/2...property-dealer-jeff-brock-fraud-foreclosures

That's ok, though. None of those who lost their homes were from the economic elite, so they deserved to lose their homes. If they didn't want to be ripped off, they would have decided to be rich.

Try actually reading the article.

The foreclosures were not fraudulent!

What he was doing was rigging the bidding. The people legitimately lost their homes, but Georgia is a recourse state which means his actions lead to greater debt for the people than otherwise would have happened.

Yes, but there is a pretty strict review process in order to collect anything more from the borrower:

Court Hearing to Confirm Sale
The court will hold a hearing before it confirms the sale. The lender must serve the borrower with notice of the hearing at least five days prior to the hearing date (Ga. Code Ann. § 44-14-161[c]). Here's what the court will do at the hearing:

The sale price must be at least fair market value. The foreclosure sale price must be at least as much as the fair market value of the property (Ga. Code Ann. § 44-14-161). The court will check on this during the hearing.

The court will review foreclosure procedures. At the hearing to confirm the sale, the court will evaluate whether or not the lender followed proper foreclosure procedures. In doing so, the court will look at:

the notices that the lender sent to the borrower
the foreclosure sale advertisement that the lender published, and
whether there was any fraud or irregularities in the sale. (Ga. Code Ann. § 44-14-161[c].)
If the sale is confirmed, the lender can file suit for a deficiency judgment against the borrower. If the sale was not proper, the court may order a resale of the property.

https://www.nolo.com/legal-encyclopedia/deficiency-judgments-after-foreclosure-georgia.html

Were there any identified borrowers harmed? It seems to be almost entirely the banks who would've gotten screwed.

 

[LordKiran]

And that's acceptable behavior where you're from?

Hannity wasn't the one doing the fraud. The houses were in foreclosure and the banks conducted an auction. (Happens all the time.) Someone unrelated to Hannity's company schemed with others to keep the auction prices low. That someone then sold the houses to Hannity's outfit at a stark markup. If you're intent is to smear someone you don't like with fraudulent activity, at least get your facts straight.

Lol as if you have any room to speak of facts.

 

[Axulus]

https://amp.theguardian.com/media/2...property-dealer-jeff-brock-fraud-foreclosures

That's ok, though. None of those who lost their homes were from the economic elite, so they deserved to lose their homes. If they didn't want to be ripped off, they would have decided to be rich.

Try actually reading the article.

The foreclosures were not fraudulent!

What he was doing was rigging the bidding. The people legitimately lost their homes, but Georgia is a recourse state which means his actions lead to greater debt for the people than otherwise would have happened.

And that's acceptable behavior where you're from?

The behavior is not acceptable, which is why the guy involved rightly got jail time and fines.

 

[Trausti]

And that's acceptable behavior where you're from?

Hannity wasn't the one doing the fraud. The houses were in foreclosure and the banks conducted an auction. (Happens all the time.) Someone unrelated to Hannity's company schemed with others to keep the auction prices low. That someone then sold the houses to Hannity's outfit at a stark markup. If you're intent is to smear someone you don't like with fraudulent activity, at least get your facts straight.

Lol as if you have any room to speak of facts.

Wut? I read the article before posting. You didn't.

 

[LordKiran]

Lol as if you have any room to speak of facts.

Wut? I read the article before posting. You didn't.

I was responding to someone else's comment that made claims, I was responding to those claims specifically that what "He" had done was rig the bidding. You have such a hate-boner for me that you'll use any opportunity to try and show me up, kinda pathetic really that you feel the need to compare yourself to me in that way.

- - - Updated - - -

And that's acceptable behavior where you're from?

The behavior is not acceptable, which is why the guy involved rightly got jail time and fines.

Good.

 

[Trausti]

I was responding to someone else's comment that made claims, I was responding to those claims specifically that what "He" had done was rig the bidding. You have such a hate-boner for me that you'll use any opportunity to try and show me up, kinda pathetic really that you feel the need to compare yourself to me in that way.

Don't flatter yourself. This is an anonymous internet forum. Don't take it too seriously.

 

[LordKiran]

I was responding to someone else's comment that made claims, I was responding to those claims specifically that what "He" had done was rig the bidding. You have such a hate-boner for me that you'll use any opportunity to try and show me up, kinda pathetic really that you feel the need to compare yourself to me in that way.

Don't flatter yourself. This is an anonymous internet forum. Don't take it too seriously.

I know, you shouldn't take it so seriously, settle down Trausti.

 

[Derec]

https://amp.theguardian.com/media/2...property-dealer-jeff-brock-fraud-foreclosures

That's ok, though. None of those who lost their homes were from the economic elite, so they deserved to lose their homes. If they didn't want to be ripped off, they would have decided to be rich.

Try actually reading the article.

The foreclosures were not fraudulent!

What he was doing was rigging the bidding. The people legitimately lost their homes, but Georgia is a recourse state which means his actions lead to greater debt for the people than otherwise would have happened.

And that's acceptable behavior where you're from?

Who says it's acceptable?
The guy was prosecuted and pled guilty.

 

[LordKiran]

And that's acceptable behavior where you're from?

Who says it's acceptable?
The guy was prosecuted and pled guilty.

Nobody did. I had asked a question because the way I had read his comment I thought he was making it seem that way.

 

[Loren Pechtel]

https://amp.theguardian.com/media/2...property-dealer-jeff-brock-fraud-foreclosures

That's ok, though. None of those who lost their homes were from the economic elite, so they deserved to lose their homes. If they didn't want to be ripped off, they would have decided to be rich.

Try actually reading the article.

The foreclosures were not fraudulent!

What he was doing was rigging the bidding. The people legitimately lost their homes, but Georgia is a recourse state which means his actions lead to greater debt for the people than otherwise would have happened.

And that's acceptable behavior where you're from?

Huh? Of course it's wrong. I'm just saying that the thread title is wrong.

 

[LordKiran]

And that's acceptable behavior where you're from?

Huh? Of course it's wrong. I'm just saying that the thread title is wrong.

Yeah thats fair, I had misunderstood you at first, apologies.

 

[Derec]

Nobody did.

Well technically Under did in his OP...

I had asked a question because the way I had read his comment I thought he was making it seem that way.

Glad you two resolved it.

 

[Emily Lake]

https://amp.theguardian.com/media/2...property-dealer-jeff-brock-fraud-foreclosures

That's ok, though. None of those who lost their homes were from the economic elite, so they deserved to lose their homes. If they didn't want to be ripped off, they would have decided to be rich.

I'm just curious... do you ever post anything outside of the video game thread that is NOT dramatically hyperbolic? Seriously my friend, if you were a female, someone would accuse you of being hysterical.