Conservative hero issued fatwah

[Underseer]

https://www.pluralist.com/posts/127...-armed-for-life-or-death-battle-with-liberals

Jihad! Jihad for Trump!

Protect the Chosen One from that treason investigation! Fatwah on the liberals!!!!!! [/Conservolibertarian]

Since all white people are terrorists, shouldn't we issue a travel ban on countries known to contain white people? Just to protect ourselves from terrorism, of course.

 

[laughing dog]

Really, James Woods? I thought he was dead.

 

[Jimmy Higgins]

The enemy said to speak out, which means vis-a-vis e plurbius unim and stuff, ergo... they are calling for violence.

Therefore, arm up, lock and load. Lets murder liberals! They started it!

 

[Elixir]

We are a resilient force because liberals in America have gone off the rails. They have become rude, violent, profane, and disgusting. And we are simply not going to take it anymore.

Yeah, what a ripoff - everyone knows that Rethuglicans used to have a monopoly on rude, violent, profane, and disgusting.
Definitely something worth defending with blood and money.... especially money.

 

[Patooka]

Now that a United States Congresswoman has called for harassment against Republicans and the inevitable violence that will come of it, I urge all of you to a) get armed, and b) vote. Your life literally depends on it.

"This is just the first salvo in a fight to elect people across the nation who will bring common sense to Washington. Please go to sarahpac.com and join me in the fight."

James, you're about a decade behind the times, buddy.

 

[Random Person]

It used to be considered bigoted to not allow certain kinds of people to eat at a restaurant.

 

[Underseer]

Sorry for the typo in the subject. That should be "issued."

When I enter text through swiping, sometimes weird things happen.

We watch this same thing over and over with radical Muslims. The ideologues make calls for violence, and they word it in a way that leaves them plausible deniability when one of their followers inevitably goes through with exactly what they said.

Radical Muslims get offended when you try to connect acts of violence to calls for violence, and conservolibertarians are no different.

Because that's how terrorists are and that's how terrorism works.

 

[Random Person]

Sorry for the typo in the subject. That should be "issued."

When I enter text through swiping, sometimes weird things happen.

We watch this same thing over and over with radical Muslims. The ideologues make calls for violence, and they word it in a way that leaves them plausible deniability when one of their followers inevitably goes through with exactly what they said.

Radical Muslims get offended when you try to connect acts of violence to calls for violence, and conservolibertarians are no different.

Because that's how terrorists are and that's how terrorism works.

You don't think Maxine was calling for violence?

 

[Arctish]

You don't think Maxine was calling for violence?

“Let’s make sure we show up wherever we have to show up. And if you see anybody from that Cabinet in a restaurant, in a department store, at a gasoline station, you get out and you create a crowd. And you push back on them. And you tell them they’re not welcome anymore, anywhere.” - Rep. Maxine Waters

Do you think she meant physically push back on their persons, or verbally push back on their policies?

 

[Angry Floof]

Any time someone rightfully shames a right wing authoritarian follower for their stunted, inhumane ideology and policies, they can reliably be counted on to make up bullshit threats of violence where there weren't any.

 

[Don2 (Don1 Revised)]

Any time someone rightfully shames a right wing authoritarian follower for their stunted, inhumane ideology and policies, they can reliably be counted on to make up bullshit threats of violence where there weren't any.

Yup, they did the same thing to MLK Jr.

 

[zorq]

It used to be considered bigoted to not allow certain kinds of people to eat at a restaurant.

It has always been understood that customers are required to maintain certain levels of decency to be served in most establishments.

 

[Keith&Co.]

It used to be considered bigoted to not allow certain kinds of people to eat at a restaurant.

It has always been understood that customers are required to maintain certain levels of decency to be served in most establishments.

And is SHS a person, or a kind of person?

 

[Angry Floof]

It used to be considered bigoted to not allow certain kinds of people to eat at a restaurant.

It has always been understood that customers are required to maintain certain levels of decency to be served in most establishments.

And is SHS a person, or a kind of person?

Nazi sympathizer is now a protected class.

 

[Underseer]

Sorry for the typo in the subject. That should be "issued."

When I enter text through swiping, sometimes weird things happen.

We watch this same thing over and over with radical Muslims. The ideologues make calls for violence, and they word it in a way that leaves them plausible deniability when one of their followers inevitably goes through with exactly what they said.

Radical Muslims get offended when you try to connect acts of violence to calls for violence, and conservolibertarians are no different.

Because that's how terrorists are and that's how terrorism works.

You don't think Maxine was calling for violence?

There has been a large increase in the number of acts of violence by conservatives since Trump started calling for violence during his campaign.

You can make similar claims, but only by citing conservative sources, the same kinds of sources that claimed "no go zones" are a thing.

I'm sorry, I know that as a conservative you have been trained to reflexively use "both sides" arguments to try and make Nazis seem less bad, but even if they were just as bad, it's still a tu quoque fallacy. Someone else being wrong doesn't make you right.

And they very much aren't just as bad.

Your argument fails on multiple levels.

- - - Updated - - -

And is SHS a person, or a kind of person?

Nazi sympathizer is now a protected class.

Oh yes. Nazis are persecuted.

Sure, we have built toddler concentration camps, but Nazis are being criticized! In public! In front of other people!

What's worse? A dirty worthless brown child being torn from her parents and kept in a kennel, or a noble superior white person being criticized?

 

[ZiprHead]

Yes, look at all these superior genes.

 

[Loren Pechtel]

Sorry for the typo in the subject. That should be "issued."

When I enter text through swiping, sometimes weird things happen.

We watch this same thing over and over with radical Muslims. The ideologues make calls for violence, and they word it in a way that leaves them plausible deniability when one of their followers inevitably goes through with exactly what they said.

Radical Muslims get offended when you try to connect acts of violence to calls for violence, and conservolibertarians are no different.

Because that's how terrorists are and that's how terrorism works.

You don't think Maxine was calling for violence?

I don't think so--I think she was calling for social pressure, not violence. Make them unwelcome.

 

[Random Person]

Sorry for the typo in the subject. That should be "issued."

When I enter text through swiping, sometimes weird things happen.

We watch this same thing over and over with radical Muslims. The ideologues make calls for violence, and they word it in a way that leaves them plausible deniability when one of their followers inevitably goes through with exactly what they said.

Radical Muslims get offended when you try to connect acts of violence to calls for violence, and conservolibertarians are no different.

Because that's how terrorists are and that's how terrorism works.

You don't think Maxine was calling for violence?

I don't think so--I think she was calling for social pressure, not violence. Make them unwelcome.

So the targeted person does what when they want to buy gas for the car? A group surrounds them and tells them to leave. Just keep pumping gas?

 

[Angry Floof]

I don't think so--I think she was calling for social pressure, not violence. Make them unwelcome.

So the targeted person does what when they want to buy gas for the car? A group surrounds them and tells them to leave. Just keep pumping gas?

They can stay or leave as they choose. Not bloody likely anyone's going to actually hurt them or even touch them, just shame them and make them face the disapproval of Americans.

 

[zorq]

I don't think so--I think she was calling for social pressure, not violence. Make them unwelcome.

So the targeted person does what when they want to buy gas for the car? A group surrounds them and tells them to leave. Just keep pumping gas?

Sure, but hopefully, the targeted person also has a bad day. Hopefully they and are forced to think about how many people are upset with the choices they have made in their lives to support lies and corruption. And hopefully, they decide to make better choices in the future.

And hopefully other people thinking about making similar shitty choices think twice lest they be exposed to similar public derision.

And then hopefully the world becomes a slightly better place with fewer people doing shitty things like choosing to lie shamelessly to the public about important public policies and events, or choosing greed and exploitation over service and fairness, etc.