angelo
Deleted
The so called consensus of scientists on GW/CC and the role of humans in the process. The American Meteorological Society in one of the few relevant organisations to have surveyed their members on the issue.
Other agencies have merely opted for a statement from their board, with no member participation. The result of the AMS survey found that 56% of it's members thought that humans had "some effect- not catastrophic, merely some effect on climate.
The PBL, Netherlands Environmental Assessment Agency conducted a survey in 2015 and found that only 43% of scientists believe in man-made GW/CC.
That's a far cry from the claimed 97% consensus of scientist as claimed by the activists/warmists.
Other agencies have merely opted for a statement from their board, with no member participation. The result of the AMS survey found that 56% of it's members thought that humans had "some effect- not catastrophic, merely some effect on climate.
The PBL, Netherlands Environmental Assessment Agency conducted a survey in 2015 and found that only 43% of scientists believe in man-made GW/CC.
That's a far cry from the claimed 97% consensus of scientist as claimed by the activists/warmists.