• Welcome to the Internet Infidels Discussion Board.

RussiaGate

Putin is a dictator, there is no question about it, but he is a benevolent dictator, like a Tsar who happens to occasionally murder people or imprison them, such as opposition, gay people, and singers.

FIFY.
So there are no gays in US prisons? I find that hard to believe.
And singers, I fairly certain that most prison inmates can sing.
 
I am glad that people finally agreed that Putin had no plan to install Trump as POTUS.


"People"? Doesn't include Putin himself, who freely admits that he had a plan to install Trump as POTUS...
No, he did not, Left-Wing media mis-translated what he said. And while we at it, Alfa-Bank story was a total fabrication as well. If i was Trump adviser I would have advised to investigate that story.
 
I am glad that people finally agreed that Putin had no plan to install Trump as POTUS. But you are still inventing crazy conspiracy theories about why would russians do what they do. I have explained it many times. Putin is a dictator, there is no question about it, but he is a benevolent dictator, like a Tsar. What he does is merely a reaction to what West or rather US neocons do to to Russia.

Tsars weren't benevolent
Well, it's a matter of degree.
 
Here's a fun tidbit I hadn't seen before (and also just posted in my Russian influence thread):

Why did then-FBI Director James Comey feel he needed to take the Clinton email matter into his own hands and cut out his own bosses, the leaders of the Justice Department?
...
The Washington Post has told the story before, and now the [Justice Department Inspector General Michael Horowitz report on the FBI investigation into Hillary Clinton's email server] confirms it: In March 2016, the FBI got ahold of "highly classified information," according to the report, that "included allegations of partisan bias" or attempts by [then-Attorney General Loretta] Lynch to impede the Clinton email probe.

The FBI looked into the discovery and could not corroborate it, plus Comey told investigators he knew from the first moment that the discovery wasn't true. According to the Post, the material purported to be a Russian intelligence document that discussed an email that was not included.

In that purported email, Lynch supposedly told a Clinton campaign staffer not to worry about the investigation because she would take care of everything.

It also said, according to the new IG report, that Comey was deliberately drawing out the Clinton email investigation to help Republicans. Comey told investigators that he knew it wasn't true and that he didn't believe that Lynch had offered the assurance to the Clinton campaign that the questionable document described.

However, even though Comey never believed the information, it still helped prompt him to decide to box out Lynch and then-Deputy Attorney General Sally Yates, the report says:

"Comey said that he became concerned that the information about Lynch would taint the public's perception of the [Clinton] investigation if it leaked, particularly after DCLeaks and Guccifer 2.0 began releasing hacked emails in mid-June 2016."

Meaning what? Not only did the Russians influence the conduct of American officials with a questionable document — the use of forgeries is a long-standing aspect of active measures — but also the American officials involved here knew the material almost certainly wasn't real. Even so, it still affected Comey's choices, and to the degree it was intended to help disrupt the election, it worked.

So the much touted "Comey effect" was evidently also the direct result of the Russian information warfare machine. As Nate Silver noted:

The impact of Comey’s letter is comparatively easy to quantify, by contrast. At a maximum, it might have shifted the race by 3 or 4 percentage points toward Donald Trump, swinging Michigan, Pennsylvania, Wisconsin and Florida to him, perhaps along with North Carolina and Arizona. At a minimum, its impact might have been only a percentage point or so. Still, because Clinton lost Michigan, Pennsylvania and Wisconsin by less than 1 point, the letter was probably enough to change the outcome of the Electoral College.
 
I am glad that people finally agreed that Putin had no plan to install Trump as POTUS.


"People"? Doesn't include Putin himself, who freely admits that he had a plan to install Trump as POTUS...
No, he did not, Left-Wing media mis-translated what he said. And while we at it, Alfa-Bank story was a total fabrication as well. If i was Trump adviser I would have advised to investigate that story.

Where did you get that from? (my wild guess - a Fox guest). Explain, then, why, when Putin was asked IF he preferred Trump over Clinton, he nodded while he said one or two words that were translated as "yes, I did and do".
I think you may be confused with the bad Trump-to-English translation during that same event when he said he "would see why..." but it was "mistranslated" by "left-wing media" as "wouldn't see why..."
The moral of the story is to continue not believing in your lying, disgusting, eyes.
 
Left-Wing media mis-translated what he said.

Poor Barbie... I actually know two people who speak and understand Russian at least as well as you do, and no... "left wing media" did NOT mis-translate him.
Which leads me to believe that there is much about Alpha Bank that bears investigation.
 
Trump Fumes Over Rex Tillerson's Claim That Putin Out-Prepared Him | HuffPost

Donald J. Trump on Twitter: "Rex Tillerson, a man who is “dumb as a rock” and totally ill prepared and ill equipped to be Secretary of State, made up a story (he got fired) that I was out-prepared by Vladimir Putin at a meeting in Hamburg, Germany. I don’t think Putin would agree. Look how the U.S. is doing!"
What provoked this outburst?
Tillerson, whom Trump fired by tweet in March 2018, told lawmakers that Russian President Vladimir Putin was better prepared than Trump for a key meeting in Germany in 2017, The Washington Post reported, citing unnamed committee aides. “We spent a lot of time in the conversation talking about how Putin seized every opportunity to push what he wanted,” a committee aide told the Post. “There was a discrepancy in preparation, and it created an unequal footing.”
He also criticized Jared Kushner for not being willing to learn his way around in foreign affairs.

Trump, a real estate operator and reality TV figure before his election, has in the past shrugged off the importance of preparation, claiming meetings with world leaders are more about “attitude” than anything else.

“I don’t think I have to prepare very much,” Trump said ahead of his first summit with North Korean leader Kim Jong Un last year. “It’s about willingness to get things done. ... It’s a question of whether or not people want it to happen.”
 
No, he did not, Left-Wing media mis-translated what he said. And while we at it, Alfa-Bank story was a total fabrication as well. If i was Trump adviser I would have advised to investigate that story.

Where did you get that from? (my wild guess - a Fox guest).
Dude, I am a native russian speaker.
And, no, not Fox news, ordinary sane news agencies which corrected themselves rather quickly
 
Left-Wing media mis-translated what he said.

Poor Barbie... I actually know two people who speak and understand Russian at least as well as you do, and no... "left wing media" did NOT mis-translate him.
Which leads me to believe that there is much about Alpha Bank that bears investigation.
LOL, sorry dude, I am right and you are wrong, most sane agencies corrected themselves Only brain dead ones kept insisting on this stupidity
 
LOL, sorry dude, I am right and you are wrong

You are quite stupid to expect anyone to believe you over these people, which includes every major news outlet in the country, left, right and center:

Putin says he wanted Trump to win

Politico
The Hill
Business Insider
The Atlantic
Snopes (fact checker)
WaPo
CNN
NBC
Boston.com
ABC
Fox5dc
Bloomberg.com
Newsweek
Huffpo
GQ
NPR
...and many more.

All agree - notice that even fox subsidiaries are in the mix.
Get your head out of your ass, and admit that you are wrong. Repeating a lie, contrary to Tump's SOP, does not make it true.
 
LOL, sorry dude, I am right and you are wrong

You are quite stupid to expect anyone to believe you over these people, which includes every major news outlet in the country, left, right and center:

Putin says he wanted Trump to win

Politico
The Hill
Business Insider
The Atlantic
Snopes (fact checker)
WaPo
CNN
NBC
Boston.com
ABC
Fox5dc
Bloomberg.com
Newsweek
Huffpo
GQ
NPR
...and many more.

All agree - notice that even fox subsidiaries are in the mix.
Get your head out of your ass, and admit that you are wrong. Repeating a lie, contrary to Tump's SOP, does not make it true.
Fuck you and your dishonest bullshit.
That's not what it was about. It was about retarded left-wing talking heads claiming that Putin admitted directing his people to help Trump to win.
 
LOL, sorry dude, I am right and you are wrong

You are quite stupid to expect anyone to believe you over these people, which includes every major news outlet in the country, left, right and center:

Putin says he wanted Trump to win

Politico
The Hill
Business Insider
The Atlantic
Snopes (fact checker)
WaPo
CNN
NBC
Boston.com
ABC
Fox5dc
Bloomberg.com
Newsweek
Huffpo
GQ
NPR
...and many more.

All agree - notice that even fox subsidiaries are in the mix.
Get your head out of your ass, and admit that you are wrong. Repeating a lie, contrary to Tump's SOP, does not make it true.
Fuck you and your dishonest bullshit.
That's not what it was about. It was about retarded left-wing talking heads claiming that Putin admitted directing his people to help Trump to win.

So it happened. He just didn't admit to it, eh?
 
Fuck you and your dishonest bullshit.
That's not what it was about. It was about retarded left-wing talking heads claiming that Putin admitted directing his people to help Trump to win.

So it happened. He just didn't admit to it, eh?
You are good. Should apply for a job at MSNBC

As should you, because it doesn't really matter whether or not Putin openly admitted any such thing. It is established fact that he did direct his people to help Trump win.
 
You are good. Should apply for a job at MSNBC

As should you, because it doesn't really matter whether or not Putin openly admitted any such thing. It is established fact that he did direct his people to help Trump win.

Apparently it did matter to left-wing talking heads.

Because their job is to report the news. Having Putin confirm--or even appear to confirm--that he specifically wanted Trump to win is obviously news, particularly at a point when Trump kept denying that there was any interference at all by Russia.
 
Fuck you and your dishonest bullshit.

Oooh. Struck a nerve, I see.
You are asking everyone here to believe that Pootey doesn't direct people to do what they can to get him what he wants.
You must be some REALLY special kind of stupid, barbie. Fuck you and your toddler-level propaganda attempts.

Apparently it did matter to left-wing talking heads.

... and the right-wing talking heads, and the centrist talking heads, and everyone else except BARBIE! :hysterical:

Putin says he wanted Trump to win

Politico
The Hill
Business Insider
The Atlantic
Snopes (fact checker)
WaPo
CNN
NBC
Boston.com
ABC
Fox5dc
Bloomberg.com
Newsweek
Huffpo
GQ
NPR
...and many more.

You need to go back to IRA and take some more propagandizing lessons - you aren't even up to level=FAIL.
 
It really isn't worth pursuing barbos on this, because all Putin clearly admitted to in Helsinki was that he wanted Trump to win because of his pro-Russia stance. AFAICT, he did not admit that he directed his people to help elect Trump. The problem is that a reporter asked him in English:

"...did you want President Trump to win the election and did you direct any of your people to officials to help him do that?"

However, Putin inserted his earpiece at the start of the question and was listening to a Russian translation of the question. It would have been stupid for him to answer affirmatively to the second part of that question, so it is hard to believe that he was addressing it. Rather, he really appeared to respond only to the first part--whether he just wanted Trump to win. He did not begin to respond until the reporter finished talking, but notice that his reply was immediate, not delayed. If he were responding to the second half of the question, then there would have been a delay for him to hear the Russian translation. Putin does understand English perfectly well, but he is careful to use a translator in situations where there could be consequences in what he says. To me, the most plausible interpretation of that event was that he heard the first part of the sentence in Russian while the second part was being spoken in English by the reporter in the audience. He then responded immediately to what he heard in Russian, not English. What he said in Russian was "ДА Я ХОТЕЛ ЧТО БЫ ОН (ВЫИГРАЛ)...", which is literally "YES I WANTED HIM TO (WIN)..." I put parentheses around the part where the voice-over in English started to obscure his Russian reply, and I have not been able to find the Russian transcript of what he continued to say.

Anyway, listen for yourself, and decide whether you agree with my perception:

[YOUTUBE]1O1piTvGt_A[/YOUTUBE]
 
Apparently it did matter to left-wing talking heads.

Because their job is to report the news. Having Putin confirm--or even appear to confirm--that he specifically wanted Trump to win is obviously news, particularly at a point when Trump kept denying that there was any interference at all by Russia.

These stupid shitheads reported something that did not actually happen.
 
Back
Top Bottom