Or perhaps you are stupid or inexperienced enough to actually believe what you are saying.
Poe's law requires that you put a "
" after a message to let people know that you aren't entirely serious. Which might have been why I mentioned Poe's law, and put a
at the end of the post. Just maybe.
Religious people almost invariably share the religion of the community in which they are raised - whether or not it is the religion of their parents.
Nationalistic people almost invariably share the nationalism of the community in which they are raised, whether or not it is the nation of their parents. Football fans almost invariably share passion for their favorite clubs. Etc. etc.. is your point that loving certain aspects of the culture of one's youth is natural? Not really sure where you're going with that one.
I care about eliminating oppression and hate- I don't care who is doing it. Hatred must be eliminated everywhere, and sometimes it requires showing someone their actions are duplicitous.
Homosexuals rarely share the sexuality of the community in which they are raised.
Yeah. Bisexuals are the only ones who truly share the sexuality of the whole community in which they were raised. It's impossible to "share the sexuality" of a community without playing both sides (and this goes far further than simple sexuality).
Unless you mean that homosexuals must go against their sexual preferences to have children?
The two are clearly very different in cause. Your assertion that they are equivalent suggests that you are more interested in making a convincing argument than in the quality of the 'facts' on which you rely.
Like I said, being religious is a genetic proclivity, or a choice. Or not. Being an asshole is a genetic proclivity, or choice, or not.
And you really need to figure out exactly what I oppose before you start arguing against what I say, or else you end up promoting hate instead of community.
I oppose hate. Doesn't matter if it's an atheist asshole who hides behind genetics to attack a social group (such as a religion), or a theistic asshole who hides behind a social group to attack a genetic group such as those who have a propensity for homosexual behaviors.
And really, when you see hate, you might as well expose it for what it is so that someone can modify there behaviors.
Even if you have to get someone to attack a strawman you set up in order to show them that their hatred is also bad.
If you do not analyze your own behaviors, and hold yourself to a high standard, you are part of the problem, not part of the solution.
And ultimately, if our behaviors destroy and harm one another, rather than lead towards unity... don't they need to stop?