• Welcome to the new Internet Infidels Discussion Board, formerly Talk Freethought.

Leftists Say Blacks Are Not More Violent, Then Why Are African Countries #1-#57 of Murder Rates?

Think about things this way if you live in 'merica. About 47% of persons under twenty-five are are "brown". All things being equal about as many white people will marry brown people as they will white people.

If you fear your kids marrying brown you are too late. Your parents should have thought about that because that's when it became apparent brown were our birthing white here in the states.

In other words you are reacting two generations too late. The die is cast. We are going to be a brown - by brown I mean other than white - nation by 2045.

Oh and it's true that those who make less birth more. As you know most not white persons in the US make less than white persons in the US. So if you want white you need to be sure that incomes are very very good.

Maybe you'll figure out a way to get this forum going back in the '60s when it might have served the purposes you are worrying about now.

So with affirmative action, would it tip the scales of incentives to have mixed race kids?
 
But the ones racist against whites are holding up signs about "LOL! Your grandkids will be brown!" To me, this is blatant racism of wanting whites to die out.

THAT is the disgusting act!

So wait, if your child marries someone brown and has kids, has your family line “died out”?


That’s amazingly hateful, ain’t it?

No.

But if someone in my family said, "I'm marrying a brown woman just so I can have brown grandkids and laugh at whites dying out!," then I would have a problem with that.

Thank goodness no one's ever said that.
 
No.

But if someone in my family said, "I'm marrying a brown woman just so I can have brown grandkids and laugh at whites dying out!," then I would have a problem with that.

Thank goodness no one's ever said that.

No, some anonymous person posted a comment on youtube, therefore all leftist believe it. That's how it works, didn't you know?
 
This is the first verse of the song "Fuck the Police" by the rap group N.W.A. from 1988:

Fuck the police comin' straight from the underground
A young nigga got it bad 'cause I'm brown
And not the other color so police think
They have the authority to kill a minority
Fuck that shit, 'cause I ain't the one
For a punk motherfucker with a badge and a gun
To be beatin' on, and thrown in jail
We can go toe to toe in the middle of a cell
Fuckin' with me 'cause I'm a teenager
With a little bit of gold and a pager
Searchin' my car, lookin' for the product
Thinkin' every nigga is sellin' narcotics
You'd rather see, me in the pen
Than me and Lorenzo rollin' in a Benz-o
Beat a police out of shape
And when I'm finished, bring the yellow tape
To tape off the scene of the slaughter

Still gettin' swoll off bread and water
I don't know if they fags or what
Search a nigga down, and grabbin' his nuts
And on the other hand, without a gun they can't get none
But don't let it be a black and a white one
'Cause they'll slam ya down to the street top
Black police showin' out for the white cop
Ice Cube will swarm
On any motherfucker in a blue uniform

Just 'cause I'm from the CPT
Punk police are afraid of me!
Huh, a young nigga on the warpath
And when I'm finished, it's gonna be a bloodbath
Of cops, dyin' in L.A.

Yo Dre, I got somethin' to say

You read that and you wonder why blacks are so violent. These guys set an example for a whole black generation!

Sorry to quote you again Half-Life but I just wanted to share a relevant video with you that I think is funny & honest. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=B50d7DesBvY

The whole form of this exact rap in this video just feels angry and violent. This is not De La Soul or one of KRS-One's more mellow songs.

But yes, I do realize tgstvyou have to meet people wgere they are. But lots of whites look at rap as a fun way to have an energetic version of musical isometrics and don't let it effect their outlook and behaviour - to use a dated reference sort of like how I used to go absolutlely savagely berserk like Joe Cocker on meth while listening to Led Zeppelin's in My Time of Dying. But for too many blacks this rap is too much of their identity. Fucking sad.

These blacks need a Robert Bly. Hell, a healthy fraction of white subcultures need another Robert Bly again to be able to be masculine without looking like they are ready to engage in a life or death battle.


My opinion is purely anecdotal and does not account for all black people, especially those that successful earned millions &/or opened up schools and fund/participate in programs to improve the black communities.

If there was a Robert Bly version of rap, most black people I know would say, "that's dope" then proceed to drive down the street blasting their usual sex, drug & violence music. They'd be too ashamed to even admit they enjoy music like that. This is not all black people just the ones I know. It's the ole typical cultural rubbish. Their are rappers today that go against the winds but even they have one or two songs at times that I can't get behind but at least they try I guess. For example Joyner Lucas & Locksmith are two black rappers I have the patience to listen to these days. My favorite at this moment is Aesop Rock (not Aesop Rocky). But Aesop Rock is white, his lyrics are too complex & he is seen as an outsider (to the folks I know).

Nowadays, I'm just not into the ole enlighten my people nonsense anymore. They are too focused on the "we are treated differently because we are black" thing. What I mean by that is, they don't know (or couldn't imagine) a world where all there are is black people around them. What would it be like? What would you be like? Would you be concerned about being treated differently based on the color of your skin? Do you not know that upon accepting you're being treated differently and changing to counter said treatment; that they've altered you in some way? At this point the usual response is I'm asking them to forget the past or turn a blind eye & that they do what they do because "the man" forces them to do it. So infuriating. If they can just stop and look at how they (we) got here today, they'd see how much of what we are doing now is not us. It may not stop it completely, but I believe it will substantially decrease the violence as well as the glorification of said violence.

This influence is an echo chamber of sorts bouncing back and forth between all communities in America & Half-Life is one of the results (not intended to be an insult). If the black people you've grown to dislike did not exist would you have opened this thread?

That's my poorly written and not well thought out opinion again.
 
No.

But if someone in my family said, "I'm marrying a brown woman just so I can have brown grandkids and laugh at whites dying out!," then I would have a problem with that.

Thank goodness no one's ever said that.
A "brown woman"?

Like a brown car?
i matched my wife's (then fiance's) skin color to paint the figures on the wedding cake, and she turned out to be Werewolf Brown. But she does not celebrate Brown Pride Month. Weird, huh?
 
Goal post change much?!!

Maybe halfie just meant to say "I'm scared of black people" from the outset?

Not even close. There are plenty of intelligent black people.

But, here's the leftist agenda: When they speak of poor whites, leftists call them, "hillbillies, rednecks, hicks, trailer park trash" etc. But, when conservatives call poor blacks "thugs," leftists immdiately yell "YOU RACIST!!!! NOT ALL BLACKS ARE THUGS!!!" This is a true statement. However, we are calling the thugs thugs, not all black people. So, why is it OK for leftists to call poor whites derogatory racist names, but conservatives can't call poor blacks derogatory names?

Leftist double standard.

How often do you hear, "THOSE INBRED REDNECKS VOTED FOR TRUMP!! UNEDUCATED TRAILER TRASH!!!"

But when poor blacks vote for Obama, they don't say, "UNEDUCATED THUGS VOTING FOR OBAMA! DISGUSTING!!!"

It is not OK to call anyone those names. It is derogatory, even when leftists do it.

You have a habit or arguing against people who aren't posting here, and it makes you come off as quite unhinged. You remind of certain left-wing posters who would do the same thing except about right wingers.

But that is ideological possession for you.
 
This thread shows how dangerous males are.

Males are dangerous because they are more violent. This is totally non controversial, and I dont know why you always trot it out as some sort of "gotcha."

To state things more correctly, males are on average more violent than females. Most males, the centers of the distribution, fall well within the bounds of typical females.

However, the most violent people, the tail end of the distribution, the sort of people who would kill someone using their hands, for example, are overwhelmingly male.

The same sort of thing is true of any kind of statement about the differences between demographic groups of people.
 
96% of homicides are committed by men.

Yes. Because men are inherently more violent, for many reasons, mostly biological. Is there some point you are trying to make here? Or are you just in the habit of posting non-controversial statements with no apparent motivation?
 
Nice job of omitting a very important factor--income. (Really, socioeconomic status but that's going to be pretty hard to figure well at that level of detail.) Criminals shoot criminals. Violent criminals are mostly from the bottom of society, a disproportionate number of people at the bottom of society are black.

This is true, although slightly more complicated. It's not just poverty, it's inequality. Inequality breeds violence. Especially among the most aggressive members of society (as Don has pointed out, these are typically male).

And of course, there are cultural factors. People and their behavior are quite complicated, although, you can make appropriate generalisations.
 
The OP of this thread is a disgusting racist screed based on information so inaccurate that it is nearly impossible to think a person could report that much concentrated wrong accidentally and not need a machine to breathe.

It's possible, of course, but hard to imagine.


Blatant racist hate-mongers are revolting and are bad for society.

I already mentioned to take the same number of poor whites and poor blacks in the same income bracket and tell me if the homicide rates are the exact same.

A nice simple fair way to do it, but no one wants to because it wouldn't be good news for leftists.

Plus, when we point out the white genocide taking place in America and Europe, you guys say, "Who cares?" So, we have self-hating whites racist against their own people.

Haha. There is no white genocide going on in Europe, and least of all America (at least in Europe you've had genocides committed against ethnic groups who would normally be classified as white).

Indeed, I am practically certain you cannot find an example of someone both acknowledging that a genocide is being committed against white people, in America or Europe no less, and that furthermore, it doesn't matter.

Claims of a genocide happening against white people (not some white on white genocide between small ethnic groups) in Europe or America is veering off into the realm of insanity.

I presume you mean that there have been major influxes of non-white people into Europe. And what you probably have seen is people claiming that this doesn't constitute genocide.

Because it doesn't.

People migrating and human populations mixing doesn't constitute genocide, and it doesn't even mean that white people will no longer exist. That is a patently racist worldview, spread by ethno-nationalists (of all stripes/colors).

Hell, you merely have to look at South and Central America, where this has been occuring for over 500 years, and you will still find plenty of White people.
 
Not even close. There are plenty of intelligent black people.

But, here's the leftist agenda: When they speak of poor whites, leftists call them, "hillbillies, rednecks, hicks, trailer park trash" etc. But, when conservatives call poor blacks "thugs," leftists immdiately yell "YOU RACIST!!!! NOT ALL BLACKS ARE THUGS!!!" This is a true statement. However, we are calling the thugs thugs, not all black people. So, why is it OK for leftists to call poor whites derogatory racist names, but conservatives can't call poor blacks derogatory names?

Leftist double standard.

How often do you hear, "THOSE INBRED REDNECKS VOTED FOR TRUMP!! UNEDUCATED TRAILER TRASH!!!"

But when poor blacks vote for Obama, they don't say, "UNEDUCATED THUGS VOTING FOR OBAMA! DISGUSTING!!!"

The definition of thug (to most folks in America) is "a violent person, especially a criminal". As a black & poor person I have to dispute the use of that term for my own safety. Whats the definition of hillbilly?

Hillbilly is a derogatory term for people from the Appalachian region of the United States. Redneck is a derogatory term for rural, working class white people.

Hillbillies and rednecks historically did not get along great.
 
They are all racist words for whites. Mexicans have "gringo" as a racist term for white people.

Gringo is not a racist term for white people, it is a term specifically for anyone from the USA. You can have a white person from Mexico (of which there are plenty) calling a black person from the USA a gringo. A white person from, say, Germany is not a gringo.

Gringo is actually an old Castillian Spanish term that was used to refer to any foreigner. In Latin America, it is specifically reserved for people from the United States (and maybe Canada?)

It isn't derogatory either. It is the equivalent of calling a person from Costa Rica a "Tico" or a Guatemalan a "chapín".
 
But the ones racist against whites are holding up signs about "LOL! Your grandkids will be brown!" To me, this is blatant racism of wanting whites to die out.

THAT is the disgusting act!

So wait, if your child marries someone brown and has kids, has your family line “died out”?


That’s amazingly hateful, ain’t it?

Yup. The only way that could be is if non-whites are not people.

I guess I commit bestiality in his book.
 
Nice job of omitting a very important factor--income. (Really, socioeconomic status but that's going to be pretty hard to figure well at that level of detail.) Criminals shoot criminals. Violent criminals are mostly from the bottom of society, a disproportionate number of people at the bottom of society are black.

This is true, although slightly more complicated. It's not just poverty, it's inequality. Inequality breeds violence. Especially among the most aggressive members of society (as Don has pointed out, these are typically male).

And of course, there are cultural factors. People and their behavior are quite complicated, although, you can make appropriate generalisations.

It's not that inequality breeds violence, it's that if everyone's poor violence won't get you much of anything. On the other hand, those who have something rarely resort to violence.
 
The whole form of this exact rap in this video just feels angry and violent. This is not De La Soul or one of KRS-One's more mellow songs.

But yes, I do realize tgstvyou have to meet people wgere they are. But lots of whites look at rap as a fun way to have an energetic version of musical isometrics and don't let it effect their outlook and behaviour - to use a dated reference sort of like how I used to go absolutlely savagely berserk like Joe Cocker on meth while listening to Led Zeppelin's in My Time of Dying. But for too many blacks this rap is too much of their identity. Fucking sad.

These blacks need a Robert Bly. Hell, a healthy fraction of white subcultures need another Robert Bly again to be able to be masculine without looking like they are ready to engage in a life or death battle.


My opinion is purely anecdotal and does not account for all black people, especially those that successful earned millions &/or opened up schools and fund/participate in programs to improve the black communities.

If there was a Robert Bly version of rap, most black people I know would say, "that's dope" then proceed to drive down the street blasting their usual sex, drug & violence music. They'd be too ashamed to even admit they enjoy music like that. This is not all black people just the ones I know. It's the ole typical cultural rubbish. Their are rappers today that go against the winds but even they have one or two songs at times that I can't get behind but at least they try I guess. For example Joyner Lucas & Locksmith are two black rappers I have the patience to listen to these days. My favorite at this moment is Aesop Rock (not Aesop Rocky). But Aesop Rock is white, his lyrics are too complex & he is seen as an outsider (to the folks I know).

Nowadays, I'm just not into the ole enlighten my people nonsense anymore. They are too focused on the "we are treated differently because we are black" thing. What I mean by that is, they don't know (or couldn't imagine) a world where all there are is black people around them. What would it be like? What would you be like? Would you be concerned about being treated differently based on the color of your skin? Do you not know that upon accepting you're being treated differently and changing to counter said treatment; that they've altered you in some way? At this point the usual response is I'm asking them to forget the past or turn a blind eye & that they do what they do because "the man" forces them to do it. So infuriating. If they can just stop and look at how they (we) got here today, they'd see how much of what we are doing now is not us. It may not stop it completely, but I believe it will substantially decrease the violence as well as the glorification of said violence.

This influence is an echo chamber of sorts bouncing back and forth between all communities in America & Half-Life is one of the results (not intended to be an insult). If the black people you've grown to dislike did not exist would you have opened this thread?

That's my poorly written and not well thought out opinion again.

Haven't you heard of Africa? The whole continent is majority black and they are one of the least technologically advanced continents in the world. Who is "the man" holding down blacks in Africa?

Face it, the excuses have been going on for far too long.

It's like the person who constantly fails school and says, "My teahcers hate me!" or they get fired from their job and say "My bosses always hate me!" or women break up with them and it's "all women hate me!" It's always someone else's fault, never their own fault.

Stop having the victim mentality!!!!
 
The whole form of this exact rap in this video just feels angry and violent. This is not De La Soul or one of KRS-One's more mellow songs.

But yes, I do realize tgstvyou have to meet people wgere they are. But lots of whites look at rap as a fun way to have an energetic version of musical isometrics and don't let it effect their outlook and behaviour - to use a dated reference sort of like how I used to go absolutlely savagely berserk like Joe Cocker on meth while listening to Led Zeppelin's in My Time of Dying. But for too many blacks this rap is too much of their identity. Fucking sad.

These blacks need a Robert Bly. Hell, a healthy fraction of white subcultures need another Robert Bly again to be able to be masculine without looking like they are ready to engage in a life or death battle.


My opinion is purely anecdotal and does not account for all black people, especially those that successful earned millions &/or opened up schools and fund/participate in programs to improve the black communities.

If there was a Robert Bly version of rap, most black people I know would say, "that's dope" then proceed to drive down the street blasting their usual sex, drug & violence music. They'd be too ashamed to even admit they enjoy music like that. This is not all black people just the ones I know. It's the ole typical cultural rubbish. Their are rappers today that go against the winds but even they have one or two songs at times that I can't get behind but at least they try I guess. For example Joyner Lucas & Locksmith are two black rappers I have the patience to listen to these days. My favorite at this moment is Aesop Rock (not Aesop Rocky). But Aesop Rock is white, his lyrics are too complex & he is seen as an outsider (to the folks I know).

Nowadays, I'm just not into the ole enlighten my people nonsense anymore. They are too focused on the "we are treated differently because we are black" thing. What I mean by that is, they don't know (or couldn't imagine) a world where all there are is black people around them. What would it be like? What would you be like? Would you be concerned about being treated differently based on the color of your skin? Do you not know that upon accepting you're being treated differently and changing to counter said treatment; that they've altered you in some way? At this point the usual response is I'm asking them to forget the past or turn a blind eye & that they do what they do because "the man" forces them to do it. So infuriating. If they can just stop and look at how they (we) got here today, they'd see how much of what we are doing now is not us. It may not stop it completely, but I believe it will substantially decrease the violence as well as the glorification of said violence.

This influence is an echo chamber of sorts bouncing back and forth between all communities in America & Half-Life is one of the results (not intended to be an insult). If the black people you've grown to dislike did not exist would you have opened this thread?

That's my poorly written and not well thought out opinion again.

Haven't you heard of Africa? The whole continent is majority black and they are one of the least technologically advanced continents in the world. Who is "the man" holding down blacks in Africa?

Face it, the excuses have been going on for far too long.

It's like the person who constantly fails school and says, "My teahcers hate me!" or they get fired from their job and say "My bosses always hate me!" or women break up with them and it's "all women hate me!" It's always someone else's fault, never their own fault.

Stop having the victim mentality!!!!

I don't think you understand what I'm saying so I'm ending our interaction indefinitely. It's entirely possible I'm missing your point as well, so there is no point in us going back and forth any further since we seem to be talking through each other and not to each other.
 
They are all racist words for whites. Mexicans have "gringo" as a racist term for white people.

Gringo is not a racist term for white people, it is a term specifically for anyone from the USA. You can have a white person from Mexico (of which there are plenty) calling a black person from the USA a gringo. A white person from, say, Germany is not a gringo.

Gringo is actually an old Castillian Spanish term that was used to refer to any foreigner. In Latin America, it is specifically reserved for people from the United States (and maybe Canada?)

It isn't derogatory either. It is the equivalent of calling a person from Costa Rica a "Tico" or a Guatemalan a "chapín".

While what you are saying is true regarding the history and definition of the word, it is indeed being used by certain individuals with racist intentions.
 
Back
Top Bottom