bilby
Fair dinkum thinkum
- Joined
- Mar 6, 2007
- Messages
- 40,077
- Gender
- He/Him
- Basic Beliefs
- Strong Atheist
Newsom is all over the place. The lockdown is actually quite half assed and the criteria for opening up more is so stupid it matches his intelligence.
That's something pretty damn cool about the Swedish prime minister. He's a working class welder, who climbed the old fashioned way. He's not eloquent. Did not get blessed with good, looks. He's not well educated. Everything about his background suggests that he should be insecure about reaching the top in society. Yet, he's the ballsiest political leader in the world right now. At least when it comes to Corona. His stance right from the start was to let scientists decide what we do, and just shut the fuck up. Yet, maintain the trust and support of the people. For somebody like him, that is incrediblly brave. Imagine Donald Trump admitting that he doesn't know what to do. It just wouldn't happen. Instead he flails around like a lion in a cage and pouts, makes shit up. Go go Sweden
Letting the scientists decide is the worst thing to do, just look at the state of the UK and what happened after listening to Neil Ferguson. Scientists and experts provide input to policy makers but they absolutely should not be allowed to make decisions but I doubt that is what actually happened. Sounds like the prime minister of Sweden is more pragmatic than some of the corrupt and power hungry bureaucrats that run California.
The only alternative to "scientists and experts" is "people who haven't got a fucking clue".
That it has become fashionable in some circles to say "I am fed up with these elites lording it over us; We should put the idiots in charge!" is frankly as astonishing as it is terrifying.

The solution to experts who make mistakes (and everyone makes mistakes - experts just make fewer and/or smaller ones) is to have MORE experts, with better understanding and more reliance on the science. Any given expert is also human, and subject to bias, error and emotion. But a consensus of experts is rarely badly wrong - and even when it is, it's literally impossible by definition for us to assess what part of their understanding is wrong, or what corrective actions are needed. Because to do so you need expertise - which you despise.