The opposite general tendency I mean. Whatever your underlying nuanced positions (and I am sure you have them because I don’t think of you as a bad person, far from it) you choose to focus, in your postings at least, almost exclusively on attacking and criticising the ‘other side’. That is not imo a balanced approach, and imo not the best way.
I agree it isn't "balanced", but I don't know that an individual expressing "balanced" views is a virtue (i refer here to expressing views, what you actively choose to engage in, not whether your views are internally 'balanced'.)
For example, I think I've quite a reputation on this board (fairly, I would say) as an anti-feminist. I also have a reputation as a "misogynist", though no proof or evidence is ever furnished for the latter accusation.
Being an anti-feminist does not mean I think every view expressed by a feminist is false (although I think the basic premise of feminism and tenets of feminism is indeed false). But feminism certainly has political, social, and cultural power in the marketplace of ideas, and this marketplace could do with expression of countervailing ideas.
If somebody devoted a great deal of their resources into charity work for HIV research, nobody (nobody sane) would scream that there are more important diseases that kill more people that they should focus on (like heart disease and cancer and type 2 diabetes). Yet, on this board and in general, it seems to me, people make that kind of accusation freely and maliciously all the time.