I find it incredible that you think humans are irrational, yet Cornell's policy decision are somehow immune from the charge of 'irrationality'. Were they made by robots?Assuming rationality, knowledge and no external costs to others, you'd have a point. Since none of that is true, your claim is wrong.
So, the fact people are required to drive on a particular side of the road does not benefit them? Sorry, your position is incredibly ignorant.
The benefits to society of forcing everybody to drive on a particular side outweigh the cost to somebody who has some strange desire to drive on the opposite side.
More libertarian nonsense. Vaccinations protect the person and others which exercise does not. Nor is your assumption about measuring benefits vs costs valid.
The assumption that I know better than you what my thoughts and feelings are?
Here's a clue: I do.
I don't know about authoritarian leftists, but I do know that people can disagree about the costs. For example, libertarians typically do not account for possible external costs on others which is why they make the argument that vaccinations should not be compelled.
I haven't written anywhere that vaccinations should or should not be compelled.
By definition, if you are literally unable to choose something, your choice is not limited in any meaningful sense. The fact I cannot choose to get an abortion does not mean my choice is limited in any meaningful sense. The fact I cannot choose to have a venison put on my pizza where I live because it is not offered does not mean my choice is limited in any meaningful sense
What bizarre linguistic gymnastics you need to make. Let's say your pizza joint offers venison to BIPOC customers but not white customers. Are you saying you don't have reduced choice compared to BIPOC customers?
I do not support it, I think there should only be exemptions for medical reasons. I simply think your argument is an example of reactionary hysteria.
I lean against Cornell forcing vaccinations on its students in order to get or continue their educations. My work goes out of its way to host flu vaccinations each autumn/winter season which it pays for. But it doesn't monitor the employees that sign up or don't, and it doesn't make contingent continued employment on getting a shot.
But if Cornell are going to force vaccination on students, it should not discriminate by race in its granting of exemptions, and if it will allow exemptions based on 'religious' objections, then it ought allow exemptions based on any other 'reason'.