DrZoidberg
Contributor
We can't be sure but I think my experiences give me a hunch that there is an intelligent force and I think a simulation is the most likely reason to explain this. (rather than the Christian explanation for God that he has existed forever)
I hope you realize that hunches are not going to convince anybody on a forum dedicated to skepticism and rational inquiry? You will have to do better than that to get traction here. Or you are just wasting your (and everybody else's) time.
No that is mainly based on post #88 and other experiences. And I never talk about proof of God... in fact I quoted in the OP:From there he makes the logical leap that that proves that God exists.
"When you [God] do things right, people won't be sure you've done anything at all"
See also post #91.
Which is argument from ignorance. If God existing and not existing has the same outcome, why bother with believing in God? What are you adding to the explanation by introducing the God concept?
The scientific world is full of very technical and specific terms for things we thought were important but we've stopped using, because they explain nothing. They're not adding to our understanding of the world. They just make explaining things more complicated.
You can remove God or an intelligent designer from your description of the world, and it would make no difference. So why keep God?