jab
Veteran Member
I think dragging out by the hair is way too harsh when the two bouncers could have carried her out to the street and dropped her there. However, comparing this situation to cops beating/shooting people is also moronic.
My point in making that comparison is the idea that overreaction and the habit of overreacting and making excuses for overeacting will not result, in my opinion, in a steady unchanging line of how far is “too far.” It will result in escalation.
To me it is a similar thought process that I see when criminals excuse their own behavior (harming people they think deserve it) based on things like prison as retribution rather than rehabilitation (harming people because we think they deserve it). The criminal is not right to do this, but they do indeed look a this to justify their worse behavior.
This is a situation where someone at the very least forced someone else to remove them from a space. We can question all we want as to the bouncer's choice of how they accomplished it, but that the accomplishment was better than having it not accomplished and the timeliness was also quite necessary.
As I have pointed out to others, I will not pity her her experiences. She earned what happened by making an unethical situation exist and failing to resolve it herself by just putting on a damn mask.
The point of contention here is whether the bouncer ought also get in trouble for "taking things too far". Quite possibly he ought. But this has nothing to do with her. She is merely the vehicle by which the bouncer's alleged bad behavior was enabled by, from my perspective.
She can go baww her butthurt over being hair dragged along with every other concern troll who want to smear businesses defending themselves nonlethally against lethal threats to their patrons.
If she had had more than her hair pulled, I would quite possibly care quite a lot more. But as it stands, this is purely transient damage arising from personal intractability.
the bouncer was a she, I think, not a he.