Don2 (Don1 Revised)
Contributor
That requires data not in evidence. We don't know anything about this student's qualifications for admission. We don't know how this student has performed in other classes. We don't know anything about this professor's grading practices.No--they serve a very useful purpose. They show that something is wrong with the admissions criteria being used.
Your response assumes the black student earned the poor performance and assumes that the student was less qualified than the average student admitted to Georgetown law. Without any independent evidence, it appears your assumption is bigoted.
If there's a racial pattern to anonymous grades ...
*FULL STOP*
Based on documented claims from university students, class participation is not anonymous and a significant part of the grade.
Loren Pechtel said:... you have a problem with how they got into the class.
Hold on a second. Your premises seem logically inconsistent. On the one hand, you are saying that grades are anonymous which you got from earlier claims in the thread from people who don't know the university. On the other hand, you are saying that someone can formulate a pattern of grades based on race (including talk about individuals being part of the "good ones" or the "bottom") in which case one can infer that grades are not anonymous. How do you reconcile your claim that grades are anonymous with an inference that grades are not anonymous inferred from your other claims? This isn't a question of non-identifying statistics being provided to the professor because she is clearly talking about an individual she is aware of in addition other individuals "really good ones" unless she is not being honest. So how do you reconcile these contradictory things?
