• Welcome to the new Internet Infidels Discussion Board, formerly Talk Freethought.

What would count as proof of God

Right you are Fwl. Then it works! :eek:

In the 1980s the UK Ministry of Defence spent a great deal of time and money studying dowsing, which has potentially huge military applications, from extending the capability of forces in arid regions by making it easier to find water, to the detection of mines, IEDs, and other buried ordnance.

At that time, my father was employed by MoD as an explosives expert, and he had copies of the classified report that resulted from these studies, which I had the opportunity to read. I never signed the Official Secrets Act myself, I no longer live in the UK, and it seems reasonable that these reports are largely now declassified under the thirty year rule, so it's probably not unlawful for me to say that these extensive, expensive, and comprehensive trials, using a large number of dowsers in a large number of double-blinded trials (many configured to specifications written in advance by the dowsers themselves) demonstrated conclusively that dowsing is no more effective than guessing.

But dowsing works for Learner and many other people, some of whom apparently do this for a living. Are you suggesting that the scientific study should be believed over the anecdotes of so many people that say otherwise?

(Sorry, couldn't resist).

You just reminded me that for quite some time we've neglected to cut the hearts from sacrificial victims to appease the gods. Interestingly the world hasn't ended. Something is wrong, I must consult the gods on this.
 
But dowsing works for Learner and many other people, some of whom apparently do this for a living. Are you suggesting that the scientific study should be believed over the anecdotes of so many people that say otherwise?

(Sorry, couldn't resist).

You just reminded me that for quite some time we've neglected to cut the hearts from sacrificial victims to appease the gods. Interestingly the world hasn't ended. Something is wrong, I must consult the gods on this.
In an argument i had, i said that i got through surgery fine with no one praying for me. The guy i was arguing with insisted that someone was praying for me. Even if only the church people praying in general for inhabitants of the city.

So, there's probably someone, somewhere, convinced that there are people secretly sacrificing. Maybe one person in ten at the meat processing plant, bent over the assembly line, whispering 'This chicken's gizzard is for you, Thor' or 'This beef tongue is for y'all, Furies.
 
But dowsing works for Learner and many other people, some of whom apparently do this for a living. Are you suggesting that the scientific study should be believed over the anecdotes of so many people that say otherwise?

(Sorry, couldn't resist).

You just reminded me that for quite some time we've neglected to cut the hearts from sacrificial victims to appease the gods. Interestingly the world hasn't ended. Something is wrong, I must consult the gods on this.
In an argument i had, i said that i got through surgery fine with no one praying for me. The guy i was arguing with insisted that someone was praying for me. Even if only the church people praying in general for inhabitants of the city.

So, there's probably someone, somewhere, convinced that there are people secretly sacrificing. Maybe one person in ten at the meat processing plant, bent over the assembly line, whispering 'This chicken's gizzard is for you, Thor' or 'This beef tongue is for y'all, Furies.

There you go. Problem solved. Because the world didn't end when I stopped cutting the hearts from living sacrificial victims it proves that somewhere the gods are being appeased. What could be more obvious? Praise god in his mercy, sparing us all despite our frailty and unworthiness.

I'm selling dousing rods in case anyone is interested. All of my rods have been used to successfully point to water and come with a certificate attesting to same.
 
I have a theory, it is not by coincidence that god is dog spelled backwards. Now what more loving creature is there? At the same time very jealous and if one barks the wrong way very vengeful....so when you get to heaven be prepared to have your face licked....
 
"So, you're telling me you wish to mind control me against my consent?"

"No, that's not what I mean at all, we're praying for you."

"Praying by talking to god?"

"Yes."

"And what do you say to him?"

"To show you how to be a believer."

"To use their infinite knowledge to do something that MAKES me believe, you mean, outside the things I've told you are my standard for belief, the standard of evidence."

"..."

"You realize, that's the very definition of mind control. Against my consent. You have asked your god to rape my very mind."

"..."

"Please never speak to me again, and consider why I have asked you that."
 
If someone believes that your current state of mind is produced by demonic temptation, isn't it mind control either way really?
 
I have a theory, it is not by coincidence that god is dog spelled backwards. Now what more loving creature is there? At the same time very jealous and if one barks the wrong way very vengeful....so when you get to heaven be prepared to have your face licked....

Yeah!

Also, if we were fleas on the back of a dog, we wouldn't see the dog!


:rimshot:
 
lol and if we used other languages for dog. Spelled backwards in those languages, both man and fleas will be at a loss.

:D
 
  • Like
Reactions: WAB
Christianity is and always has been about controlling minds, insillingpower, and building power.

I grew up in RCC schools but it did not take.

At high school graduation we were supposed to kiss the ring of the bishop, some of us did not. The idea of calling a priest father is about a power relationship.

It is not just the Vatican. The Southern Baptist Convention is notorius for power internal power politucs.

Billy Gram built a financial empire and built political power. His son a few years back resigned as head of a Chrtian college under allegations of mishandling funds. All the Christian scandals of the 80s and 90s, all about money and power.

The pope is the ultimate religious power trip. In RCC theology on moral hisses he is second only to god on Earth. In the 90s and beyond the RCC has threatened Catholic politicians with excommunication or loss of escarpments if they did not vote like the pope wants.

There are the blind followers immersed in religious ecstasy, and there is the leadership who profit from it. It is disgusting at times watching the predatory Christians on TV shows. If anything is evil, they certainly are.

Gd is as real as the people make it.
 
I have a theory, it is not by coincidence that god is dog spelled backwards. Now what more loving creature is there? At the same time very jealous and if one barks the wrong way very vengeful....so when you get to heaven be prepared to have your face licked....

But dogma complicates things. It implies that the correct teaching is that god is a mother dog. Or an old hillbilly woman who raises blue tick hounds. Possible scenarios:
(a) God does turn out to be a giant pregnant mother dog with swollen nipples. Attendant angels are up there, patiently explaining to Jerry Falwell that, to gain his full heavenly endowments, he has to suck beagle boob with all the other dead & faithful. (Obviously, they've been telling him this for 15 years.)
(b) God is just a lazy, contented old bitch, well past her breeding years, and happy just to mingle with dead folks.
(c) God is that angry hillbilly woman with the hounds, guarding her porch with a shotgun, and completely unapproachable.
Any good pastor should be able to preach and justify any of these versions.
 
Or, "What would count as proof that there is an invisible dog in the room with you?" We don't even have to give the dog any of those super magic powers. It's just a dog and it's invisible. That's all.

So what would count as proof that it is there?
 
To simplify things - If you don't have to give your dog superpowers... can we just say your dog is visible instead?
 
For the ancient Hebrew writers was the word god taken to be a reflection of the human male, or were human males a reflection of god?
 
For the ancient Hebrew writers was the word god taken to be a reflection of the human male, or were human males a reflection of god?

I suspect that they wanted everyone else to think that ancient Hebrew writers were a reflection of God.

Blessed are the meek is propaganda - everyone except us should be meek, 'cos you guys have a lot more to be meek about than we do, with not being properly God-like, and all.
 
To simplify things - If you don't have to give your dog superpowers... can we just say your dog is visible instead?
But how does that help us determine whether an invisible dog has fleas? Would the fleas be invisible too?

Before we get to those things we have to know if the dog is in the room. What would count as proof?
 
To simplify things - If you don't have to give your dog superpowers... can we just say your dog is visible instead?
You...want to prove a people?
I mean, in the context of PROOF OF GOD(s) you want it stipulated that this skybeast has no superpowers.

So... Howard? You want to discuss proof of Howard?
 
To simplify things - If you don't have to give your dog superpowers... can we just say your dog is visible instead?
You...want to prove a people?
I mean, in the context of PROOF OF GOD(s) you want it stipulated that this skybeast has no superpowers.

So... Howard? You want to discuss proof of Howard?

Let's not overlook Barney the invisible man-sized rabbit. There was a movie about him so Barney must be real.
 
Back
Top Bottom