The New Intelligent Design <id> and Its Powerful Correct Scientific Explanations

[Hermit]

The New Intelligent Design <id> and Its Powerful Correct Scientific Explanations

LOL

Intelligent design (ID) is a pseudoscientific argument for the existence of God, presented by its proponents as "an evidence-based scientific theory about life's origins".[1][2][3][4][5] Proponents claim that "certain features of the universe and of living things are best explained by an intelligent cause, not an undirected process such as natural selection."[6] ID is a form of creationism that lacks empirical support and offers no testable or tenable hypotheses, and is therefore not science.[7][8][9] The leading proponents of ID are associated with the Discovery Institute, a Christian, politically conservative think tank based in the United States.[n 1]

Although the phrase intelligent design had featured previously in theological discussions of the argument from design,[10] its first publication in its present use as an alternative term for creationism was in Of Pandas and People,[11][12] a 1989 creationist textbook intended for high school biology classes. The term was substituted into drafts of the book, directly replacing references to creation science and creationism, after the 1987 Supreme Court's Edwards v. Aguillard decision barred the teaching of creation science in public schools on constitutional grounds.[13] From the mid-1990s, the intelligent design movement (IDM), supported by the Discovery Institute,[14] advocated inclusion of intelligent design in public school biology curricula.[7] This led to the 2005 Kitzmiller v. Dover Area School District trial, which found that intelligent design was not science, that it "cannot uncouple itself from its creationist, and thus religious, antecedents," and that the public school district's promotion of it therefore violated the Establishment Clause of the First Amendment to the United States Constitution.[15]

(Link)

Oh sorry, I had been contacting Meyer and Behe and Hugh Ross, and Ken Ham and Hovind etc to support me since I am not a member of the old ID that is being supported by the DI. Sorry, you must know the differences... You must know the scientific opponent that you are facing now, or be sorry later. If it happens that you directly contact them, tell them about me... It will help the whole scientific world.

Your assertions are repackaged creationism. To quote from the link you provided in the opening post:

One of the most bizarre and controversial conclusions from Charles Darwin and supporters of the Theory of Evolution (ToE) was that the change (in all species
or all living organisms) is un-intentional, uncontrolled, non-intelligence and unguided

This is the position of all creationists, including the ones who renamed 'creationism' 'intelligent design'.

 

[Keith&Co.]

Hi, evolution is simply a change with time (it is funny, change is automatically associated with time, obviously, right?),

Yeah, but what would change look like without time?

 

[bilby]

The optimum strategy for the game of pigeon chess turns out to match exactly with the optimum strategy for global thermonuclear war.

In the words of one of the leading NORAD strategists of the 1980s:

"A strange game. The only winning move is not to play" - Joshua

 

[Keith&Co.]

The optimum strategy for the game of pigeon chess turns out to match exactly with the optimum strategy for global thermonuclear war.

I dunno 'bout that. Not sure how you'd spatchcock an REB.

Edit to add: we need a 'i got that reference' like button.

 

[steve_bank]

The woo woo choo choo is now boarding, destination oblivion.

Woo is quite comforting depending on the person, their lot in life, their state of knowledge and which end of the woo money flow they're on.

Hagendaz icecream is comforting during dark lonely nights. Pizza too.

 

[fromderinside]

The optimum strategy for the game of pigeon chess turns out to match exactly with the optimum strategy for global thermonuclear war.

I dunno 'bout that. Not sure how you'd spatchcock an REB.

Edit to add: we need a 'i got that reference' like button.

Both "Attach files" and "Insert quotes" seem adequate

To wit: https://2.bp.blogspot.com/_2zjCQzXw458/TA2MbfeJNfI/AAAAAAAACp4/f2aWW5SDsEQ/s1600/IMG_1679.JPG

 Wargames

 

[MrIntelligentDesign]

Thank you, guys. For probably two weeks or more, I will never be able to answer all of your posts to me. I will be submitting to Nature Journal a science article titled, "Scientific Falsification of the Theory of Evolution (ToE) and Its Replacement". If Nature rejected me, the article will end up in Zenodo, and I will be sharing you again the link... if you want. But in break time, I will be probably reading all your comments. Guys, I am very serious in science for I think I am right.

 

[excreationist]

Thank you, guys. For probably two weeks or more, I will never be able to answer all of your posts to me

Hi could you answer this from post #21?

Do you believe that there have been millions of years of animals eating animals, etc, before people sinned?

 

[excreationist]

Well this seems like the foundation of his new Intelligent Design theory:

 

[Worldtraveller]

Your a civil engineer? Huh, weird that you seem to conflate word salad philosophy/theology for science...the fellow engineers I know wouldn't mix those up.

The New Intelligent Design <id> and Its Powerful Correct Scientific Explanations

How will you answer this scientific question in science or religion?

I see lots of words, and not much of anything regarding scientific presentation...but did only read just short of 2 pages, then scanned...

Interestingly, both of the engineers I've met that were creationists were civils.

Also, we had double check everything they did.

 

[T.G.G. Moogly]

Thank you, guys. For probably two weeks or more, I will never be able to answer all of your posts to me. I will be submitting to Nature Journal a science article titled, "Scientific Falsification of the Theory of Evolution (ToE) and Its Replacement". If Nature rejected me, the article will end up in Zenodo, and I will be sharing you again the link... if you want. But in break time, I will be probably reading all your comments. Guys, I am very serious in science for I think I am right.

I've come to the conclusion that you are pulling our leg. The broken english, awkward syntax. Maybe English just isn't your first language or maybe you are attempting to appear as a bot. But thanks for the laugh.

 

[funinspace]

Thank you, guys. For probably two weeks or more, I will never be able to answer all of your posts to me. I will be submitting to Nature Journal a science article titled, "Scientific Falsification of the Theory of Evolution (ToE) and Its Replacement". If Nature rejected me, the article will end up in Zenodo, and I will be sharing you again the link... if you want. But in break time, I will be probably reading all your comments. Guys, I am very serious in science for I think I am right.

I've come to the conclusion that you are pulling our leg. The broken english, awkward syntax. Maybe English just isn't your first language or maybe you are attempting to appear as a bot. But thanks for the laugh.

He's pretty easy to find on the wild wild web, and seems to be a real guy promoting a variant of ID, and by the bios out there was born in the Philippines.

 

[pood]

The optimum strategy for the game of pigeon chess turns out to match exactly with the optimum strategy for global thermonuclear war.

In the words of one of the leading NORAD strategists of the 1980s:

"A strange game. The only winning move is not to play" - Joshua

I was going to say, “you guys know you are playing chess with a pigeon, right?” But then this …

 

[pood]

Thank you, guys. For probably two weeks or more, I will never be able to answer all of your posts to me. I will be submitting to Nature Journal a science article titled, "Scientific Falsification of the Theory of Evolution (ToE) and Its Replacement". If Nature rejected me …

Pretty good bet, that.

 

[Jarhyn]

Thank you, guys. For probably two weeks or more, I will never be able to answer all of your posts to me. I will be submitting to Nature Journal a science article titled, "Scientific Falsification of the Theory of Evolution (ToE) and Its Replacement". If Nature rejected me, the article will end up in Zenodo, and I will be sharing you again the link... if you want. But in break time, I will be probably reading all your comments. Guys, I am very serious in science for I think I am right.

I've come to the conclusion that you are pulling our leg. The broken english, awkward syntax. Maybe English just isn't your first language or maybe you are attempting to appear as a bot. But thanks for the laugh.

He's pretty easy to find on the wild wild web, and seems to be a real guy promoting a variant of ID, and by the bios out there was born in the Philippines.

... Isn't that one pervy child molesting wanna be cult leader crank from the Philippines? What is his name...

@Keith&Co. I know for a fact you know who I'm talking about; I would remember if not for the fact that I personally quit the FSTDT list; subjecting myself to that raw firehose of filth was not doing me favors.

Not to mention that I think this guy's absence from the FSTDT list is a shame, assuming he's still absent from it?

 

[Keith&Co.]

Thank you, guys. For probably two weeks or more, I will never be able to answer all of your posts to me. I will be submitting to Nature Journal a science article titled, "Scientific Falsification of the Theory of Evolution (ToE) and Its Replacement". If Nature rejected me, the article will end up in Zenodo, and I will be sharing you again the link... if you want. But in break time, I will be probably reading all your comments. Guys, I am very serious in science for I think I am right.

I've come to the conclusion that you are pulling our leg. The broken english, awkward syntax. Maybe English just isn't your first language or maybe you are attempting to appear as a bot. But thanks for the laugh.

He's pretty easy to find on the wild wild web, and seems to be a real guy promoting a variant of ID, and by the bios out there was born in the Philippines.

... Isn't that one pervy child molesting wanna be cult leader crank from the Philippines? What is his name...

@Keith&Co. I know for a fact you know who I'm talking about; I would remember if not for the fact that I personally quit the FSTDT list; subjecting myself to that raw firehose of filth was not doing me favors.

Not to mention that I think this guy's absence from the FSTDT list is a shame, assuming he's still absent from it?

Are you talking about David Stewart? He's on Guam.

 

[steve_bank]

Thank you, guys. For probably two weeks or more, I will never be able to answer all of your posts to me. I will be submitting to Nature Journal a science article titled, "Scientific Falsification of the Theory of Evolution (ToE) and Its Replacement". If Nature rejected me, the article will end up in Zenodo, and I will be sharing you again the link... if you want. But in break time, I will be probably reading all your comments. Guys, I am very serious in science for I think I am right.

What are your scientific credentials, and are you just prodding us to give you something to put in an article?

The 10 Commandments prohibit lying.

 

[Jarhyn]

Thank you, guys. For probably two weeks or more, I will never be able to answer all of your posts to me. I will be submitting to Nature Journal a science article titled, "Scientific Falsification of the Theory of Evolution (ToE) and Its Replacement". If Nature rejected me, the article will end up in Zenodo, and I will be sharing you again the link... if you want. But in break time, I will be probably reading all your comments. Guys, I am very serious in science for I think I am right.

I've come to the conclusion that you are pulling our leg. The broken english, awkward syntax. Maybe English just isn't your first language or maybe you are attempting to appear as a bot. But thanks for the laugh.

He's pretty easy to find on the wild wild web, and seems to be a real guy promoting a variant of ID, and by the bios out there was born in the Philippines.

... Isn't that one pervy child molesting wanna be cult leader crank from the Philippines? What is his name...

@Keith&Co. I know for a fact you know who I'm talking about; I would remember if not for the fact that I personally quit the FSTDT list; subjecting myself to that raw firehose of filth was not doing me favors.

Not to mention that I think this guy's absence from the FSTDT list is a shame, assuming he's still absent from it?

Are you talking about David Stewart? He's on Guam.

Oh yeah, that's right... I'm a dummy! My bad!

 

[blastula]

"STUPID!" That is the normal reaction of many people and scientists when they read and hear the topic of Intelligent Design. I cannot blame them. Because of this necessity and curiosity, I discovered intelligence in science and really define and categorize "STUPID" to "non-STUPID" (actually a synonym of other words) and wrote science article for free, to support my claims. I cannot copy and paste the whole article for discussion, but I can give you link FREE and discuss here.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The New Intelligent Design <id> and Its Powerful Correct Scientific Explanations

How will you answer this scientific question in science or religion? “How can you differentiate a created X to an un-created X”? Will you answer, “The created X is complex or irreducibly complex and the un-created X is simple or reducibly complex?”. Or in Biology, a difference or dividing line between an intentionally made biological cell to non-intentional? Will you answer, “intentional is information-coded while the non-intentional is no-information code,”? Or in Cosmology, an intelligently designed Universe to non-intelligently designed Universe?

The New Intelligent Design and Its Powerful Correct Scientific Explanations

All scientific explanations regarding origins, causes and effects, forensic-like studies, and the differences between two opposites or two extremes, as being used in all fields in science such as Biology, Astronomy, Cosmology, Psychology, etc., and all topics that require a complete scientific...

doi.org

The nicest I can say in response is this is as good as any other intelligent design argument I've seen.

 

[steve_bank]

Your a civil engineer? Huh, weird that you seem to conflate word salad philosophy/theology for science...the fellow engineers I know wouldn't mix those up.

The New Intelligent Design <id> and Its Powerful Correct Scientific Explanations

How will you answer this scientific question in science or religion?

I see lots of words, and not much of anything regarding scientific presentation...but did only read just short of 2 pages, then scanned...

Interestingly, both of the engineers I've met that were creationists were civils.

Also, we had double check everything they did.

I worked with good engineers who were creationists. They compartmentalized faith and physics.