• Welcome to the new Internet Infidels Discussion Board, formerly Talk Freethought.

Police Misconduct Catch All Thread

Water can still burn even if cooled below boiling.
Water can burn in a fluorine atmosphere, or in the presence of other highly oxidising reagents such as chlorine trifluoride.

Do not try this at home.

Now, you may be wondering what the point of this obviously irrelevant bit of pedantry is. To which I can only say "you started it".
 
They didn't even need to enter the home. There was absolutely no reason for them to go inside or remain if they felt unwelcome. Both officers should have taken that rebuke in Jesus' name as an invitation to leave. Instead, one of them explicitly admitted he was going to shoot her in the face & closed the gap between them to do precisely that. Then followed up with delaying medical treatment. First-degree murder charges make sense.
There most certainly is a reason to enter if they didn't catch the guy. They need to make sure he's not inside and she's acting under duress.

Well officers neither acted like that was the reason for entering and didn't tell her that was the reason for entering. They didn't even secure the house when they entered. They glanced into one room and didn't even enter the kitchen area or any other room (until after killing her). both officer's seemed comfortable focusing on the car and getting her ID rather than a possible intruder inside the house.
 
After watching the video in slow motion multiple times, she did throw the pot toward the officers.

Edit: In self defense against someone who just threaten to shoot her in the face.
How do you throw something in self defense against a threat rather than against an action?

WTF are you talking about?
 
She did. If you watch the video at the slowest speed, after she said she's sorry and dropped to the ground leaving the pot in the sink, you can see her just under the officer's right arm as he was approaching her, grabbing the pot from the sink and tossing it in the officers direction. She was practically on her knees at that moment she released the pot. I believe she did that in a panic because the officer treated her as if she had the pot even in the moments that she didn't. She was scared.

I've watched it a few times at the slowest speed and it's not clear to me what she did and I don't see the pot, maybe it's the resolution on my monitor or something. It's possible I suppose so I'll defer to your judgement as you have taken the time to review. But I still say the cop is a raging psycho with an itchy trigger finger.
At 28:22 (warning disturbing content) in a panic and fearing for her life, she quickly stood up, grabbed the pot, dropped back down and tossed it, which is how the water ended up all over the floor. You might even see some steam, although that could also be from the gunfire; I'm no expert. The officer will likely use this against her, but it was he who escalated the situation with someone who had a mental health issue. She had literally discussed her medication with the officer before they entered, and she's the one that called 911 for help.


28-22.png
 
She was definitely afraid and in a panic.
That much I will certainly agree with. But people in a panic sometimes do very stupid things.

Yeah, like an officer panicking and escalating from being rebuked in Jesus' name to threatening to shoot someone in the face & immediately drawing his weapon.
 
It was merciful of the brave peace officer to fire a third shot at her head. In many of the incidents we see when U.S. cops encounter a black person, the black victim is left to bleed out -- often while his girlfriend is screaming for ambulance but not allowed to use her cell-phone to call 911 -- but isn't bleeding out a gruesome way to die?

Less understandable is the action of the other cop, who asked for an ambulance. Since they would need to fill out OIS-63 forms whether she lived or died, wouldn't letting her bleed out be most expeditious even without the fatal shot?
 
Is it possible that the guy was so dumb he didn't know what the word "rebuke" meant? I'm not making excuses because there were many opportunities for a different outcome by both officers and I am just trying to understand his very irrational and bizarre action of threatening her after she spoke calmly of her desire to criticize him. She had a pot of water near the sink because of his actions and she criticized him "I rebuke you in the name of Jesus." There's no other word in that phrase that he might not know the meaning of except rebuke. He then screams, "You better fucking not or I'll shoot you in the fucking face," meaning he interpreted her words, character, and actions in sum as a physical threat....unless you think he misheard her or just wanted to kill her.

At that point the other officer could have calmed him down or even yelled at him to stop. He could of course also regained his senses... or de-escalated the situation he created. He chose to only use his gun when he could have easily dodged his imagined enemy or used other non-lethal means to do whatever to get himself out of the situation he irrationally imaged he was in. "What else could we do?" That's denialism that comes from mental trauma of knowing you fucked up but your brain tries to make excuses. Speaking of the water, "Hey look, it came right to our feet, too." What next, is he going to say something about how she could have attacked him with the oven mitts?

This video should make one wonder how prevalent this kind of shit was before we got a small taste of transparency from required body cam videos. Prior to that, there were always stories about victims, and those who supported the victims were viewed as radical crazy people. But of course there are still many people who continue to make excuses even when they see murder right in front of them...
 
Last edited:
Despite both the sheriff and the state's attorney finding the officer's actions unjustifiable, some still question the victim's conduct. I wonder why.
 
Back
Top Bottom