ideologyhunter
Contributor
<self-deported.>
Last edited:
Did you misspell “prepardoned” ?They'll weaponize Jesus. The rest will flow as preordained.
The US does not gave the capability of successively carrying out much of Trump’s deportation plans. Nor is he likely to get much of his agenda through Congress unscathed.
Where he can do real damage is with appointments, firings and administrative policy along with some tariff policy.
If he gets some of his way on deportations snd tariffs, goods and services will become more expensive - something people will notice.
They've already removed the filibuster for SC judges. I'm starting to agree that Sotomayor should step down.W-w-whattt???????????? Didn't the Repubs instruct us over and over that the filibuster is a necessary device to insure that the minority party has a voice? I am shocked. Shocked.
For shame!
Feeling surly about the reality of slim (1%!) majority support for a political candidate is no excuse for inaction in the face of evil deeds. That's like throwing your baby in front of train because you are annoyed that it cried. Especially since many of the people most affected by the policies you propose abetting didn't have right to vote in the election you're trying to punish them for.
Is this a popular sentiment? If so, no wonder the Democrats are losing popular support, the faithless cowards! We're not even properly to the battle yet, and you lot are casting about for a pair of unsoiled underpants to make your surrender flag from! Fight, you fools, fight like your rights depend on it. Because they DO.
Maryland will not quietly go along, but we are not large enough or populous enough to defend ourselves. They did that to us in 1861, with federal troops, even though we have now moved to the other side of the aisle.I wish! But so far, there's very little talk of that on the street. Less than last time, even.Maybe California should secede if it gets bad.
And really, that would just be kicking the can down the road. Losing California, the state most opposed to their alliance, would cement Trump/Putin's power within the remaining nation of the US, while also making us all legal targets for mass violence. State secession is illegal under Constitutional law, so if we do in fact try to secede, he can then march in troops to take everything back and ask no apology for doing it.
Most people live in their TVs.Crime is down where we live.
Most people live in their TVs.Crime is down where we live.
Crime is up on TV.
I occasionally see a few minutes of Law and Order, and am invariably horrified by the political and moral axioms on which that fictional universe is founded, and by the realisation that these are being internalised by many fans of the show as "the way reality is".Most people live in their TVs.Crime is down where we live.
Crime is up on TV.
Certainly the number of Law and Orders and CSIs have gone up!
My in-laws won't go out at night and were terrified that we were going out to eat at the Korean restaurant in "that part of town".Most people live in their TVs.Crime is down where we live.
Crime is up on TV.
And no, they don't get out much; Haven't you heard? It's dangerous out there.
An interesting thing I saw on this: People are mismeasuring crime. The police have responded to the 2020 spike by focusing more effort on the big crimes--but the result is minor crimes and general disorder have gone up.Most people live in their TVs.Crime is down where we live.
Crime is up on TV.
And no, they don't get out much; Haven't you heard? It's dangerous out there.
Not just American. Some of her relatives were concerned when we were planning a trip to a part of China that isn't Han. Nothing about the area that suggested trouble.I am trying my best to be nice now, to everybody. Can my being right help them? No?
My in-laws won't go out at night and were terrified that we were going out to eat at the Korean restaurant in "that part of town".Most people live in their TVs.Crime is down where we live.
Crime is up on TV.
And no, they don't get out much; Haven't you heard? It's dangerous out there.
No, they watch Fox News all day.Don’t the people that have fallen for them ever go outside?
Law and Order is fun, but it sure the heck isn't real. Homicide Life on the Streets is much better. Cases that aren't actually solved, cases that take a long time to solve,I occasionally see a few minutes of Law and Order, and am invariably horrified by the political and moral axioms on which that fictional universe is founded, and by the realisation that these are being internalised by many fans of the show as "the way reality is".Most people live in their TVs.Crime is down where we live.
Crime is up on TV.
Certainly the number of Law and Orders and CSIs have gone up!
Perhaps that's why I prefer science fiction, where it is more difficult to forget that the stories presented are entirely the invention of scriptwriters, and do not need to have any connection to real events or persons, living or dead.
There is, allegedly, an up-side. Apparently police are increasingly having their work made easier, by criminals who saw CSI, and thought that gave them real world insights into how to defeat real police forensics.
Is it though?An interesting thing I saw on this: People are mismeasuring crime. The police have responded to the 2020 spike by focusing more effort on the big crimes--but the result is minor crimes and general disorder have gone up.Most people live in their TVs.Crime is down where we live.
Crime is up on TV.
And no, they don't get out much; Haven't you heard? It's dangerous out there.
without any kind of citation so we might consider the facts, who knows?Is it though?An interesting thing I saw on this: People are mismeasuring crime. The police have responded to the 2020 spike by focusing more effort on the big crimes--but the result is minor crimes and general disorder have gone up.Most people live in their TVs.Crime is down where we live.
Crime is up on TV.
And no, they don't get out much; Haven't you heard? It's dangerous out there.
At least she is out there. Good for her!For example, this morning I had a friendly, disagreement about Trump with an 83 year old woman who exercises with my group. She is frail and usually only lasts about 15 minutes of our 45 minute workout.
It isn't. There has definitely been a spike under Biden.I asked her why she thought that and she said that Biden was letting millions of illegals across the border. I told her that about the same number came in when Trump was president. She said that wasn't true.
Coming legally is certainly more difficult than doing it illegally. And legal immigration has limits on numbers of visas granted, so not everybody who wants to come in can. That does not justify illegal immigration. And while many illegals are "very dear people" as individuals, that does not mean we should have de-facto open borders and allow unlimited numbers of people to come in. Numbers matter. Think of your household. You may invite a stranger to Thanksgiving dinner, but that is quite different than 20 of them showing up uninvited. Even if most of them are "very dear people" individually.Then she said they should come here legally and I tried to explain how difficult it was do to that and that I knew some undocumented immigrants and they were very dear people, who worked in Mexican restaurants, and I'd love for people like them to be able to come her legally.
Do you have a citation where NYT claims that there have been as many illegals coming in under Trump as under Biden? Note also that NYT has its own biases of course.She obviously was getting her information from either fox or newsmax. I explained to her that the NYTimes has been around since 1851 and had won more awards for journalism than any other news sources, so I trust the statistics I read there, compared to what I might see on tv news.