• Welcome to the new Internet Infidels Discussion Board, formerly Talk Freethought.

How should west respond to potential (likely) Russian invasion of Ukraine?

Utter garbage and ignoring the facts and points.
All these fallacies are yours!

And as usual, wilful ignoring of the posts.
No comments on anything.
 
Hasty Generalization fallacy:
Throwing random word salad "fallacies" fallacy.
You are like these beauty pageants talking
It was not Hasty and it was not Generalization and it was not fallacy
I merely described to you your situation. where you effectively claiming that for the first time in US history US had nothing to do with events when it's clear as day that US had 100% to do with these events. US always take part in all moreless important events. And this was extremely important development which was in reality 100% instigated by Washington scam.
BoJo just literally said that We (the west) are conducting proxy war with Russia. Prior to that he said "I told them (Kiev regime) let's fight Russia"
Before that around 2010, right hand of Saakashvili literally said the the only requirement for getting US grants in Georgia was hating Russia. I repeat, she was a right hand of Saakashvili and that 's what she said.
 
Last edited:
One of the few remaining western journalists destroys western narratives:

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Bartlett in 2014
Eva Karene Bartlett (born 14 June 1977) is an American Canadian activist, journalist, commentator, and blogger who has propagated conspiracy theories in connection to the Syrian civil war,<a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eva_Bartlett#cite_note-:0-1"><span>[</span>1<span>]</span></a><a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eva_Bartlett#cite_note-hspec01-2"><span>[</span>2<span>]</span></a><a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eva_Bartlett#cite_note-Worrall_2016-3"><span>[</span>3<span>]</span></a> most notably the disproven allegation that the White Helmets stage rescues and "recycle" children in its videos.<a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eva_Bartlett#cite_note-:0-1"><span>[</span>1<span>]</span></a><a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eva_Bartlett#cite_note-:2-4"><span>[</span>4<span>]</span></a><a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eva_Bartlett#cite_note-:3-5"><span>[</span>5<span>]</span></a><a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eva_Bartlett#cite_note-:4-6"><span>[</span>6<span>]</span></a>

Bartlett describes herself as an "independent writer and rights activist".<a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eva_Bartlett#cite_note-:2-4"><span>[</span>4<span>]</span></a> She writes commentary pieces for Russian state-controlled RT's website.<a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eva_Bartlett#cite_note-8"><span>[</span>note 1<span>]</span></a><a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eva_Bartlett#cite_note-:1-9"><span>[</span>8<span>]</span></a><a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eva_Bartlett#cite_note-10"><span>[</span>9<span>]</span></a> Critics contend that her advocacy amounts to participation in a disinformation campaign aimed at lessening the responsibility of the Assad regime for the acts of indiscriminate killing during the war, and to promote pro-Kremlin content in relation to the 2022 Russian invasion of Ukraine.<a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eva_Bartlett#cite_note-nbnews-11"><span>[</span>10<span>]</span></a> Her posts on social media have been tagged with the disclaimer that her writings "may be partially or wholly under the editorial control of the Russian government."<a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eva_Bartlett#cite_note-12"><span>[</span>11<span>]</span></a>

Bartlett has been living in Russia since 2019. She has been making videos and posts on social media from Ukraine during the Russian invasion, sometimes with journalists from RT. She often appears as a guest on RT. She has been criticised for spreading Kremlin propaganda and misinformation.<a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eva_Bartlett#cite_note-nbnews-11"><span>[</span>10<span>]</span></a><a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eva_Bartlett#cite_note-CBC_2022-13"><span>[</span>12<span>]</span></a>
 
All these fallacies are yours! And I'm telling my mommy! And my daddy, he's going to beat you up because he's in the SAS and the Navy Seals, and he can beat your dad with one hand behind his back. And anyway, you're a poopy head*.








* I apologise to regular viewers of this thread if my post is a touch over-intellectual and detailed in its citations and reasoning, but I have made some attempt to keep it on the prevailing intellectual level
 
One of the few remaining western journalists destroys western narratives:

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Bartlett in 2014
Eva Karene Bartlett (born 14 June 1977) is an American Canadian activist, journalist, commentator, and blogger who has propagated conspiracy theories in connection to the Syrian civil war,<a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eva_Bartlett#cite_note-:0-1"><span>[</span>1<span>]</span></a><a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eva_Bartlett#cite_note-hspec01-2"><span>[</span>2<span>]</span></a><a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eva_Bartlett#cite_note-Worrall_2016-3"><span>[</span>3<span>]</span></a> most notably the disproven allegation that the White Helmets stage rescues and "recycle" children in its videos.<a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eva_Bartlett#cite_note-:0-1"><span>[</span>1<span>]</span></a><a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eva_Bartlett#cite_note-:2-4"><span>[</span>4<span>]</span></a><a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eva_Bartlett#cite_note-:3-5"><span>[</span>5<span>]</span></a><a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eva_Bartlett#cite_note-:4-6"><span>[</span>6<span>]</span></a>

Bartlett describes herself as an "independent writer and rights activist".<a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eva_Bartlett#cite_note-:2-4"><span>[</span>4<span>]</span></a> She writes commentary pieces for Russian state-controlled RT's website.<a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eva_Bartlett#cite_note-8"><span>[</span>note 1<span>]</span></a><a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eva_Bartlett#cite_note-:1-9"><span>[</span>8<span>]</span></a><a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eva_Bartlett#cite_note-10"><span>[</span>9<span>]</span></a> Critics contend that her advocacy amounts to participation in a disinformation campaign aimed at lessening the responsibility of the Assad regime for the acts of indiscriminate killing during the war, and to promote pro-Kremlin content in relation to the 2022 Russian invasion of Ukraine.<a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eva_Bartlett#cite_note-nbnews-11"><span>[</span>10<span>]</span></a> Her posts on social media have been tagged with the disclaimer that her writings "may be partially or wholly under the editorial control of the Russian government."<a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eva_Bartlett#cite_note-12"><span>[</span>11<span>]</span></a>

Bartlett has been living in Russia since 2019. She has been making videos and posts on social media from Ukraine during the Russian invasion, sometimes with journalists from RT. She often appears as a guest on RT. She has been criticised for spreading Kremlin propaganda and misinformation.<a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eva_Bartlett#cite_note-nbnews-11"><span>[</span>10<span>]</span></a><a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eva_Bartlett#cite_note-CBC_2022-13"><span>[</span>12<span>]</span></a>

You was fast. In your age is dangerous, could trip and hit your empty had or something.
And no, attack on the character does not count as addressing the point.
By the way, everything you imply is false.

But fine, why no character assassination for Jeffrey Sachs? why do you ignore him?
Why do you ignore videos I posted, do you best, assassinate smartphone cameras.

Sorry man, just becasue she exposes US misdeeds everywhere including Syria does not make her automatically wrong.
You need facts, Like the video of BBC taking part in chemical attack staging. That was a fact.
United States funded ISIS in Syria (no, not directly of course) that is the fact.
 
Last edited:
Former Navalny supporter/operative explains how the american meddling works and why is she no longer supports this BS:
 
Last edited:
You know, Barbos, you would get a lot more engagement with your posts if you weren't so fucking lazy with your posting style.

This is IIDB. That is an acrostic. It stands for : Internet Infidels Discussion Board. Did you notice those last two words? They exist because the intended behavior of members is to DISCUSS topics here on the BOARD.

I will have you notice that you are not posing on IILVDG: Internet Infidels Lazy Video Dumping Ground. If you thought that IILVDG is where you were posting then you are making a different and more stupid but more forgivable mistake. But seeing as you now understand where you are, you should consider actually DISCUSSING topics that you want to discuss instead of lazily dropping a video in the thread.

For example, (because I understand how dense and stubborn you can be) instead of the post you just made above, you could write:

Imaginary-Non-lazy-Barbos said:
Hey you nazi guys, I just watched a cool vid from someone who can explain exactly how American meddling works. Because I am imaginary and not fucking lazy I am going to explain and discuss what they said in the video and then I will add some of my own thoughts and Ideas.

The first thing to know is that....
And when tis happens, Americans always do ....
And it is so totally impossible for anyone to just say "no" to this meddling because....
And this meddling is so mild, milktoast, legal, and common in the international community, that the only possible reaction is for a completely uninvolved 3rd country (like Russia) to send column after column of fucking murderous death squads to kill, murder, rape and pillage everyone in that country until the entire cultural identity is seared from history.
Isn't that wild?
Thanks for discussing this with me you nazi guys. Let me know what you think.

So now you have an easy template to help you use a Discussion Board. You are welcome.
 
Where is the evidence of WMD in Ira..... I mean North Korean troops in Ukraine or Russia?
American government scum talks about it as if it is the fact.
And since when US got a veto on presence of anybody in Russia?
Who the fuck do you think you are? World Government?
How about you assholes take the hell out of Europe because it sure as hell looks like an escalation to us.
Вы блядь охуели!
 
Last edited:
So US neocons are deciding whether or not to annul presidential elections in Romania, becasue their candidate lost.
So much for democracy. Yanukovich must be having a chuckle about it.
Meanwhile Nuland paid puppets continue maidan in Tbilisi.
I think Georgian government will be able handle these assholes, they have to, for the sake of their country.
 
Last edited:
One of the few remaining western journalists destroys western narratives:

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Bartlett in 2014
Eva Karene Bartlett (born 14 June 1977) is an American Canadian activist, journalist, commentator, and blogger who has propagated conspiracy theories in connection to the Syrian civil war,<a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eva_Bartlett#cite_note-:0-1"><span>[</span>1<span>]</span></a><a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eva_Bartlett#cite_note-hspec01-2"><span>[</span>2<span>]</span></a><a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eva_Bartlett#cite_note-Worrall_2016-3"><span>[</span>3<span>]</span></a> most notably the disproven allegation that the White Helmets stage rescues and "recycle" children in its videos.<a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eva_Bartlett#cite_note-:0-1"><span>[</span>1<span>]</span></a><a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eva_Bartlett#cite_note-:2-4"><span>[</span>4<span>]</span></a><a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eva_Bartlett#cite_note-:3-5"><span>[</span>5<span>]</span></a><a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eva_Bartlett#cite_note-:4-6"><span>[</span>6<span>]</span></a>

Bartlett describes herself as an "independent writer and rights activist".<a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eva_Bartlett#cite_note-:2-4"><span>[</span>4<span>]</span></a> She writes commentary pieces for Russian state-controlled RT's website.<a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eva_Bartlett#cite_note-8"><span>[</span>note 1<span>]</span></a><a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eva_Bartlett#cite_note-:1-9"><span>[</span>8<span>]</span></a><a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eva_Bartlett#cite_note-10"><span>[</span>9<span>]</span></a> Critics contend that her advocacy amounts to participation in a disinformation campaign aimed at lessening the responsibility of the Assad regime for the acts of indiscriminate killing during the war, and to promote pro-Kremlin content in relation to the 2022 Russian invasion of Ukraine.<a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eva_Bartlett#cite_note-nbnews-11"><span>[</span>10<span>]</span></a> Her posts on social media have been tagged with the disclaimer that her writings "may be partially or wholly under the editorial control of the Russian government."<a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eva_Bartlett#cite_note-12"><span>[</span>11<span>]</span></a>

Bartlett has been living in Russia since 2019. She has been making videos and posts on social media from Ukraine during the Russian invasion, sometimes with journalists from RT. She often appears as a guest on RT. She has been criticised for spreading Kremlin propaganda and misinformation.<a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eva_Bartlett#cite_note-nbnews-11"><span>[</span>10<span>]</span></a><a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eva_Bartlett#cite_note-CBC_2022-13"><span>[</span>12<span>]</span></a>

You was fast. In your age is dangerous, could trip and hit your empty had or something.

Drinking and typing again?

And no, attack on the character does not count as addressing the point.
By the way, everything you imply is false.
I implied nothing. I provided proof that she is nothing more than a Russian apologist.

But fine, why no character assassination for Jeffrey Sachs? why do you ignore him?
Why do you ignore videos I posted, do you best, assassinate smartphone cameras.
Most of the videos you post are people no one has ever heard of and we have no reason to believe they aren't paid shills for Russia.

Sorry man, just becasue she exposes US misdeeds everywhere including Syria does not make her automatically wrong.
You need facts, Like the video of BBC taking part in chemical attack staging. That was a fact.
United States funded ISIS in Syria (no, not directly of course) that is the fact.
:words:
 
What’s happening in Georgia, and why are thousands protesting? More than 200 were arrested and dozens injured during protests after Georgia’s ruling party said it would suspend talks to join the European Union.

Tens of thousands of protesters in Georgia have overtaken the capital city’s historic Rustaveli Avenue in recent days, waving the national flag, tossing fireworks and clashing with police in tense demonstrations against the ruling party’s decision to suspend talks to join the European Union.

The decision, seen by the opposition as yet another sign of the ruling party cowing to Russian influence, comes months after the Georgian Parliament passed a “foreign agent law” that critics say mirrors a Russian law used to suppress independent journalism and watchdog groups as well as target dissidents.
Not all is happiness and fairydust in Russiaville.
 
Why Ukraine is resisting so hard:

1) From the start Russia intended some genocide:


2) And the reality of the occupation:


Ukraine knows what you did last time and knows you intend to destroy them this time around. Their backs are to the wall, of course they fight.
According to ukro-nazi terroritsts.
I mean Budanov? Seriously? Seriously?
Do you even have a brain?
What's next citing Ben Laden or Hitler as a trusted source?
I agree the first one isn't the most solid thing but I doubt they would go to the press without having shown western sources the alleged documents.
 
Buyers of Russian weapons have now seen them in action. Who the hell would want to buy an S-400 when it can't even defend itself?
Turkey, India, China all want S-400. Turkey are extremely happy with it. it's way better than US crap called Patriot.
This conflict has shown that.
And speaking of S-400, just today, Regime in Washington gave up on S-400 in Turkey.
They realized that Turkey would rather leave NATO than give S-400 up.

You are talking absolute bullshit!
Remember, you're comparing modern S-400s to pretty old Patriots. US weapons are tricky that way--we retain names over a wide range of evolution. A 2020-era Sidewinder is nothing like a 1970-era Sidewinder but both are still "Sidewinder". And everybody overhypes missiles, reporting ideal performance conditions vs real world performance.

And I would be surprised if any realistic comparison is actually available to the public. Washington isn't going to want to admit what it knows about the performance of the S-400, Moscow isn't going to want to admit what they know about the performance of the Patriot. Thus anybody who knows is in a position they can't talk about it.
 

Do the computer nerds in Russia know how to trim a message-board quote down to a dozen paragraphs or two? Instead of -- I dunno -- trying to set a new record for longest multi-quote?
Yeah, feels like it's time for a war on quotes. To keyboards! To keyboards!
 
Buyers of Russian weapons have now seen them in action. Who the hell would want to buy an S-400 when it can't even defend itself?
Seven days later...
Well, well, well.
ISW said:
Bloomberg reported on December 3 that senior Indian officials stated that India has sharply reduced its defense equipment orders from Russia and instead started purchasing defense equipment from Western suppliers.
...
One unnamed senior Indian official reportedly stated that Russian-made weapons are often cheaper than Western weapons but need frequent repairs, which increases their long-term costs.
I guess reused components soldered on to circuit boards by hungover Russians with shaky hands does not make for a very reliable weapon system. When you press the "Fire" button and the damn thing bursts into flames, you know you're not getting your money's worth.
 
Back
Top Bottom