The people who have a problem with Israels actions don't seem to be able to come up with any kind of alternative realistic plan that will disarm Hamas for good.
The bombing and invasion did not disarm Hamas for good, but it did kill tens of thousands of Palestinian civilians. Is that the realistic part of that plan?
If you can't get what you want you'll have to settle for what you can get. Politics is the art of the possible. Its not an excercise in utopianism
So, you are saying that since Israel could not get the disarmament of Hamas they settled for killing thousands of civilians? That’s a political victory?
No, he's saying that the disarming of Hamas for good is a required goal in order for anyone who disagrees with him to be taken seriously, but that he expects to be taken seriously himself, despite falling short of that goal.
There's one rule for his policies, and another rule for anyone with the temerity to challenge those policies.
It's a very effective way for him to ignore the deep flaws in his position.
You can't come up with a realistic plan, so you should be ignored. He can't come up with a realistic plan, so he should be congratulated on his pragmatism and compromise.