19% of Republicans Have Favorable View of Kim Jong Un

[Underseer]

Liberals are exactly as bad because they never did anything about Hillary's secret child prostitution ring run out of the basement of that pizza restaurant that doesn't have a basement!

Also, Obama used his secret weather weapon and confiscated all off our guns!!!!!! [/Conservolibertarian]

 

[Elixir]

Recommend you get yourself a street corner and a sign and yell that post at passers-by until you find one that cares.

Not a surprising recommendation.
As the author of the comment challenging the NK system as socialist, please allow me to inform you that I was referencing the broader, accepted general use definition of socialism. I now realize that this ruffles your feathers, since your purpose in using the word in the first place, was to tarnish any form of collectivism by associating it with a brutal dictator's autocratic regime. Then ignore the valid counter to your borderline idiosyncratic definition and declare that you don't care. There's a word for people who do that habitually;
TROLL.
Fail better, dismal.

 

[dismal]

Recommend you get yourself a street corner and a sign and yell that post at passers-by until you find one that cares.

Not a surprising recommendation.
As the author of the comment challenging the NK system as socialist, please allow me to inform you that I was referencing the broader, accepted general use definition of socialism. I now realize that this ruffles your feathers, since your purpose in using the word in the first place, was to tarnish any form of collectivism by associating it with a brutal dictator's autocratic regime. Then ignore the valid counter to your borderline idiosyncratic definition and declare that you don't care. There's a word for people who do that habitually;
TROLL.
Fail better, dismal.

I see no point in arguing with someone who thinks the Merriam-Webster dictionary is not an acceptable source for word definitions.

Good luck with your delusions!

 

[ZiprHead]

I see no point in arguing with someone who thinks the Merriam-Webster dictionary is not an acceptable source for word definitions.

Good luck with your delusions!

That's okay, dismal. It's generally pretty pointless to try to discuss anything with you at all.

 

[Jimmy Higgins]

Recommend you get yourself a street corner and a sign and yell that post at passers-by until you find one that cares.

There are a few people that protest outside a clinic that I wanted to join with a sign reading "ABORTION IS A NOUN!!!"

 

[Elixir]

Recommend you get yourself a street corner and a sign and yell that post at passers-by until you find one that cares.

Not a surprising recommendation.
As the author of the comment challenging the NK system as socialist, please allow me to inform you that I was referencing the broader, accepted general use definition of socialism. I now realize that this ruffles your feathers, since your purpose in using the word in the first place, was to tarnish any form of collectivism by associating it with a brutal dictator's autocratic regime. Then ignore the valid counter to your borderline idiosyncratic definition and declare that you don't care. There's a word for people who do that habitually;
TROLL.
Fail better, dismal.

I see no point in arguing with someone who thinks the Merriam-Webster dictionary is not an acceptable source for word definitions.

Whereas someone who thinks the Oxford dictionaries are not acceptable for English word definitions is "worth arguing with"?
I'd say it's worth arguing with someone who calls North Korea a socialist society, as their delusions are apparently unbounded, and motives for saying so in a "politics" forum are transparently dishonest - they're being a TROLL.

 

[laughing dog]

Good luck with your delusions!

I give up - I am no longer going to try to keep my irony meter functioning.