• Welcome to the Internet Infidels Discussion Board.

2023 House vote for speaker

\
[Ted Lieu with a bag of popcorn]
You know, the Speaker is elected by the whole House. To me, that means that the whole House has the responsibility to find a candidate that can gather a majority behind him. Instead of stuffing their pieholes with popcorn and reveling in Schadenfreude, maybe Dems should reach across the aisle to find some sort of compromise.
The Republicans should reach across the aisle and find some sort of compromise.

Since it's the Republican Party having the problem, it's up to them to sort it out. Instead, McCarthy is bartering away his authority just so he can have the title, and setting up the House of Representatives for an utterly dysfunctional shit show.

Here in Alaska, when intransigent rightwing radicals were actively working to shut down the government rather than compromise on their pet issues, nine Democrats and eight Republicans reached across party lines and formed a bipartisan majority in the state Senate. It's been working out very well for us. They don't agree on everything but they handle their disagreements like responsible adults and work toward solutions.
 
Last edited:
Well it's Donald Trump Day. The day we remember all of what Trump has done to America. And what better way to commemorate the day than to have the party of Donald Trump continue to make history in a way only it can. We look forward to their beating that nail further into the wood knowing full well there is nothing on the other side for it to grab hold of. We look forward to their continued promotion of a man who thrives in promoting himself. We look forward to their continued acquiescence to a bumbling gang of hijackers who have about as few off-ramps now as a Russian dictator. Yes, what better way to commemorate Donald Trump Day than to have a nonfunctioning government. So here's to you Donald Trump and the cancer you represent.
 
\
[Ted Lieu with a bag of popcorn]
You know, the Speaker is elected by the whole House. To me, that means that the whole House has the responsibility to find a candidate that can gather a majority behind him. Instead of stuffing their pieholes with popcorn and reveling in Schadenfreude, maybe Dems should reach across the aisle to find some sort of compromise.
*spit take*

The 20 or so Republicans that are holding the process hostage aren't even taking the process seriously. They don't even have a candidate. But let's yank out the but-whadda-bout the Dems nonsense. Rep. Jeffries is a viable candidate to get behind.

McCarthy is effectively neutering the Speaker's position with his concessions instead of dealing with the Democrats.
 
Relax folks. We should all have seen this coming from a mile away. We all know that the first two words a republican speaks when they're born is "the democrats!".
 
Relax folks. We should all have seen this coming from a mile away. We all know that the first two words a republican speaks when they're born is "the democrats!".
Republicans in 2022: "The Democrats are the problem!"

Republicans in 2023: "The Democrats need to fix our problem!"
 
This opinion piece from The Atlantic is a must-read. Here are some excerpts:

. . .
Ambition and opportunism are common among politicians, but McCarthy took it to new levels. He even sorted Trump’s favorite Starburst candies so that the “Toddler in Chief” could avoid the icky yellows and oranges. (I am not making this up.)
. . .
McCarthy and others have asked what the rebels want—but they do not understand that the rebels have no tangible goals. A significant part of the Republican Party, and especially its base, now lives in a post-policy world. Governing is nothing. The show is everything.
. . .
If you think Lauren Boebert or Matt Gaetz or Andy Biggs are possessed of deep thoughts about any of these issues, you have already made the same mistake that brought McCarthy to this impasse. Gaetz’s big idea in politics is that—according to a Trump aide’s testimony to the House Select Committee on January 6—he should be given a blanket pardon for things he swears he didn’t do. (Gaetz has denied asking for the pardon.) Biggs is the high-minded Cincinnatus who suggested that the January 6 riots could be blamed on the FBI; Boebert ran a gun-themed restaurant back in Colorado and often says things that lead to debates not over policy, but over whether she is the most ignorant person currently sitting in Congress.
. . .
This is the best of all worlds for someone like Jordan, one of the most irresponsible members of Congress, who thinks his job as a legislator is to show up at hearings and Gish gallop the proceedings into chaos. He gets to support McCarthy and look like a team player, and then, no matter what happens, get the job he wants: chair of the House Judiciary Committee, where he likely intends to investigate Hunter Biden and impeach the president.

The Republican rebellion is rooted in a giant inferiority complex: We know we’re not popular, we know a lot of people think we’re jerks, but we’ll show everyone that we can paralyze this country and its institutions using the machinery of government. Democracy, process, lawmaking, and governing? All of that is for saps . . .
 
  • Like
Reactions: jab
\
[Ted Lieu with a bag of popcorn]
You know, the Speaker is elected by the whole House. To me, that means that the whole House has the responsibility to find a candidate that can gather a majority behind him. Instead of stuffing their pieholes with popcorn and reveling in Schadenfreude, maybe Dems should reach across the aisle to find some sort of compromise.
Since you're a proud Biden voter — or pretend to be — what would your advice to the Dems be? Vote or abstain so as to make the hard-core Trump-licker Kevin McCarthy Speaker? The same Kevin who has already conceded enough to the Boebert faction to ensure that the entire term is ineffective chaos, instead of just the first week? Back Byron Donalds so the House gets a black Speaker? Jim Jordan to ensure 2023 and 2024 are about nothing but Hunter's laptop?

Any thoughts at all, Derec? Or was writing "stuffing their pieholes with popcorn" the entire point of your post, with some AI engine adding arbitrary words to turn your bitter phrase into useless but grammatically proper sentences?
 
How can you Yanks stuff up so publicly a simple yes/no vote?

No wonder your presidential results get mired in controversy.
They never were, until the current crop of conservotards decided they didn’t want to honor the results of a free, fair, certified election. Now those same clowns are holding Congress hostage.
I hope this backfires on them spectacularly.
 
\
[Ted Lieu with a bag of popcorn]
You know, the Speaker is elected by the whole House. To me, that means that the whole House has the responsibility to find a candidate that can gather a majority behind him. Instead of stuffing their pieholes with popcorn and reveling in Schadenfreude, maybe Dems should reach across the aisle to find some sort of compromise.
Never interrupt your enemy when he is making a mistake.
 
Take a moment to see what is being talked about inside the conservative bubble regarding McCarthy:

From the article, among the many lies therein:

This gives a partial explanation of why Democrats and Deep State operatives are happy to have McCarthy as speaker.

Yeah, they're so happy, that of the 2,332 votes democrats have placed in the last four days,
every single one of them was for AGAINST the Kevin.

Instead of stuffing their pieholes with popcorn and reveling in Schadenfreude, maybe Dems should reach across the aisle to find some sort of compromise.

Aw gee, you can't expect those Dem meanies to do anything but mock all those great 'Murkins on the right who are working so very hard to fulfill the strong mandate issued to them by the 'Murkin voters. It's not like those shadenfruede-occupied goose-stepping lefties have accomplished anything in the last two years, right? They have the nerve to expect not one or two or three, but SIX dedicated Right Wingers to move toward their commie ideals and vote for Jeffries or some compromise candidate? While they can hold the whole government hostage instead? Dreaming.
It's not those 20 well intended fascist people who want to burn down the House who are to blame. Nor the hundred and something Republican insurrectionists still trying to overturn American democracy to install an orange dictator. No, it's the people who want to continue this 250 year old "democracy" scam who are to blame for all of this, [removed]
 
Last edited by a moderator:
\
[Ted Lieu with a bag of popcorn]
You know, the Speaker is elected by the whole House. To me, that means that the whole House has the responsibility to find a candidate that can gather a majority behind him. Instead of stuffing their pieholes with popcorn and reveling in Schadenfreude, maybe Dems should reach across the aisle to find some sort of compromise.

That's like blaming a battered wife for living with a serial abuser.
 
The Boebert faction is using their duel with "Kiev Kevin" to raise campaign funds.

Another article at the same site informs us that the metal detectors on entrance to the House chamber were removed at the start of the 118th Congress (despite that there were no Members sworn in to give such an order). With Boebert and other Republicans packing heat on the chamber floor, and inviting sociopathic constituents to the Capitol, can we expect some replay of January 6?
 
Take a moment to see what is being talked about inside the conservative bubble regarding McCarthy:

From the article, among the many lies therein:

This gives a partial explanation of why Democrats and Deep State operatives are happy to have McCarthy as speaker.

Yeah, they're so happy, that of the 2,332 votes democrats have placed in the last four days,
every single one of them was for AGAINST the Kevin.
I'd nitpick that and say that Democrats votes were for Jeffries. The small GOP bloc is voting against McCarthy, as there is no actual alternative candidate at the moment. They keep jumping ships.
 
This is a real book

young-guns-9781451607345_lg.jpg
Pew! Pew! Pew!
 
I'm so confused about the seditioners' position on Ukraine; it seems incredibly self-defeating absent present context. Since when has any Republican ever won on the basis of their opposition to war? Usually the Republicans can't even imagine a country they'd be unwiling to "nuke to the stone age" just to make a point, even if they have no idea where it is or who lives there. Hell, I still get plenty of adults in my classes who have no real notion of where Afghanistan is or what languages are spoken there, but damn if they aren't happy to kill whoever inhabits it.

But in our upside down world, for some reason, betraying their nation and supporting an unashamed enemy dictator (who is completely transparent in his views on American democracy and civil liberties - he hates them) this is a winning position for them rather than a disaster.
 
Because why should the US defend Ukraine when that money could be used to help save America from CRT and other windmill-ish boogiemen.

And to be clear, I don't think this is just a seditionist part of the party, unless you are including McCarthy et al. who voted to cancel an election and likely want to turn off money to Ukraine.
 
Back
Top Bottom