I disagree. Many of these people have spent years working alongside our troops, often putting their lives and the lives of their families in danger from Taliban reprisals. And they have done this because they identify with our cultural and social values, especially with regard to personal freedoms.
For those for whom this applies - great! I am not saying let no Afghans in. I am saying, be cognizant of the fact that vast majority of Afghans are Islamists and vet accordingly. I.e. more strictly then we did with Somalis, so that now areas with heavy Somali populations are also hotbeds for Islamic terrorist recruitment.
I also think it is naïve to think all - or even most - of these workers did so out of any ideological support for US. I would say most did it for money.
I think they have more than met any reasonable standard one may conceptualize for vetting them. Here in the US we don't judge people for their thoughts and beliefs, we judge them by their actions. The US is not in any danger of being overrun by fundamentalist Muslims; our constitution is strong and will withstand whatever challenges a tiny minority of radicalized immigrants might come up with.
US may be not in any danger yet, but Muslim population is rapidly and exponentially growing due to both immigration and high birth rates. And Afghans have very high birth rates, just like the Somalis. It is not rare to find Somali families with more than 10 kids in Minnesota!
As history shows, the most immediate threat to our democracy comes from homegrown radicalized Christian nationalists, who not so long ago tried to violently overthrow our democratically elected government by invading Congress. It is important that we keep our priorities straight and not give in to baseless xenophobic rhetoric.
BS. The January 6th riot is the most overblown thing in US politics today. It pales in comparison with the months long violent rioting and occupations in many US cities last year.
Impressive! You are able to predict the growth rate of Muslim immigrants who become radicalized jihadi's simply by looking at unsourced, short-term growth rate numbers for Muslims in Europe, and extrapolate this data to multiple future generations of their descendants who are raised in a western culture.
These Islamists do not really raise their kids in a "western culture". They basically live in parallel societies and do not interact much with the kafirs.
You should nominate yourself for the Noble Prize. Have you done that yet?
Not familiar with that one.
Hiring sex workers is illegal in most states, a felony or a misdemeanor depending on circumstances.
The impetus for making sex work illegal is a philosophy shared with Islamism - desire to control what other people do with their lives and their bodies.
That is contrary to the American ideal of personal liberty. So I am embodying what America is about better than the Christian, Islamist and Feminist illiberals and authoritarians.
Believing in the Muslim god is NOT a crime; in fact, it is a constitutionally protected right. Can you tell the difference?
Believing in a god is one thing. Believing that Shariah Law should be the law of the land is quite another. Can you tell the difference?
You took an oath to abide by the laws of this land when you because a naturalized citizen, assuming you are a citizen. And here you are, breaking the law and describing your exploits on the internet.
It is no different than gay people having sex pre-Lawrence. Laws like that are really un-American!
I will take a law abiding Muslim who has fought for democracy in Afghanistan alongside US troops over a whiney, criminal non-Muslim any day of the week.
Spoken like a good dhimmi! So I guess having consensual sex is bad because some busybody politicians say it's bad but supporting a theocracy is great because to your knowledge they never hired adult female hookers (although they may have slept with underage "dancing boys", which I guess is ok to you because we can't criticize Muslims?)